Home J Young Pharm. Vol 17/Issue 1/2025 Assessment of the Level of Satisfaction with Online Teaching and Learning among Faculty and Students at Selected Health Sciences College, Puducherry

Assessment of the Level of Satisfaction with Online Teaching and Learning among Faculty and Students at Selected Health Sciences College, Puducherry

by [email protected]

1Department of Child Health Nursing, Kasturba Gandhi Nursing College, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), SBV Campus, Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, INDIA

2Department of Child Health Nursing, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), SBV Campus, Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence: Dr. Sumathy Ponnambalam Vice-Principal, Kasturba Gandhi Nursing College, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), SBV Campus, Pillaiyarkuppam-607402, Puducherry, INDIA. Email: [email protected]
June 26, 2024; July 22, 2024; August 20, 2024.
Copyright ©2025 Phcog.Net
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Citation

Published in: Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2025; 17(1): 86-88. Published online: 18 January 2025DOI: 10.5530/jyp.20251338

ABSTRACT

Background

The COVID 19 pandemic lock down forced educational institutions to shut down and amid this is the new reality-online teaching learning that emerged as a potent tool to support the crisis. However, medical instructors and students face a number of difficulties when they have a transition from traditional learning to fully online instruction. Hence the study was intended with the aim of assessing the level of satisfaction with online teaching and learning.

Methodology

Quantitative research approach and a descriptive research design was adopted for the study. A total of 380 Health Science students and 27 Faculty members participated in the study. Online Course Satisfaction Survey (OCSS) tool was used to assess the satisfaction of the students and online instructor satisfaction survey tool was used to assess the satisfaction of the faculty members.

Results

The response rate was 100% for students and 77% for faculty members. The results revealed that majority of the students 345(90.8%) were highly satisfied with online teaching, as there was a clear delivery of content and offered flexibility, whereas among the faculty members 78% were moderately satisfied with online teaching, as they had technical issues, took longer time for preparation etc.,

Conclusion

During COVID-19, online teaching and learning has proven to be a useful and practical method for curriculum delivery.

Keywords: COVID 19, Faculty satisfaction, Online teaching learning, Student satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted educational processes all over the world. It had also affected the medical schools, where the question of maintaining academic continuity was a great challenge.1 Because of this, a large number of academic institutions all over the world have been making an effort to implement cutting-edge technology as the main mode of delivering online instruction is online learning by utilizing online platforms such as Zoom, Google Classroom and Google Docs, among many others.2

However, health care instructors and students face a number of difficulties when they have a transition from traditional learning to fully online instruction.3 In order to operate the programme effectively, it is crucial to comprehend learners’ contentment with online learning.4

Online learning is bringing about pedagogical changes in the way we teach and learn. As a substitute for top-down lectures and passive learners, educators are using an interactive, team-based approach where students and teachers jointly design the learning process. From being the “sage on the stage” to being “the guide on the side,” the Instructor’s position is evolving.5

It should not come as a surprise to researchers that describing the components of satisfaction has grown considerably more dynamic and difficult. The construct has a variety of aspects, most of which get more academic as a course goes on. Given that they have begun providing online training to their students, university faculty members are eager to discover how to enhance learning outcomes through online instruction.6

However, students have more discretion over the course content and schedule to suit their own learning needs and level of freedom.7

However, this unexpected and rapid shift has raised concerns about the caliber of instruction, students’ academic achievement and student happiness because there is a lack of knowledge or guidance on the best online teaching practices for teachers.8

A wide range of factors, such as feedback, flexibility, workload, technology support, instructor pedagogical skills and student participation in online conversations, are considered when defining satisfaction with online learning. Student interactions with teachers, other students and the course material all have a big impact on how satisfied they are. As a result, learning experience happiness rises with many Students satisfaction with the learning process increases when additional forms of interactivity are introduced into the learning environment. When they engage in organized extracurricular activities on top of their academic schedule, students are happier. The informal contacts between teachers and students are equally important to the learning process.

Here in this study, the researcher was interested in evaluating the level of satisfaction of both faculty members and students who were involved in the online teaching and learning.

METHODOLOGY

The study design was a descriptive cross sectional research design that was conducted among Health Sciences faculty members and students. A total of 27 faculty members and 380 students participated in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee (Ref No. KGNC/ IHEC/2023/002). Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants.

Online Course Satisfaction Survey (OCSS)9 was used to assess the satisfaction of the students where a 5 Point Likert scale, that ranged from strongly agree to strongly disagree was used.9 It consisted of various subscales namely Instructor, technology, setup, interaction, outcomes and overall satisfaction items. The reliability of the tool was r=0.91 which was tested by test re test method. Online instructor satisfaction survey10 was used to assess the satisfaction of the faculty by using 5 Point Likert scale, that ranged from strongly agree to strongly disagree. It consisted of various subscales namely Students, Instructor, Institutions and overall satisfaction. The reliability of the tool was 0.85.

The satisfaction scales for both faculty members and students were mailed to the participants through Google forms. The forms were filled by the participants and returned by mail. 380 students filled up the forms and submitted them and out of 35 faculty members, 27 faculty members responded.

Statistical Analysis

The data was analyzed by using SPSS software version 20. Descriptive statistics-percentage, mean and standard deviation was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Out of 380 students, 1[0.3%] had less satisfaction 34 [8.9%] were moderately satisfied and 345[90.8%] were highly satisfied with online learning (Table 1). Majority of the students 214[56.7%] agreed that in online learning, there was a clear delivery of content by the instructor. Majority of students 202 [53.2%] agreed that the assignments were clearly communicated by the instructor in online learning. And majority of students 200 [53%] felt that online discussion were interactive and effective. Most of the students 200 [53%] agreed that they were satisfied with online session. Students expressed satisfaction with online learning as compared to in-person sessions, with 176 [46.7%] agreeing to it.

Level of Satisfaction Frequency (N=380) Percentage
Low 1 0.3%
Moderate 34 8.9%
High 345 90.8%
Table 1:
Frequency of Satisfaction of students in Online Learning.

Regarding the level of satisfaction among faculty members with relation to online teaching, 78% of them expressed moderate satisfaction while only 7% expressed high satisfaction (Figure 1).

Figure 1:
Overall satisfaction of the Faculty towards Online teaching and learning.

A majority of the faculty members 16(55.2%) firmly agreed that the absence of in-person interactions with students was a result of online instruction. The majority of faculty members 8[27.6%] strongly agreed that motivating students in online learning is more difficult than in traditional teaching. The majority of faculty members 11(93.9%) strongly agreed that technological issues made online instruction frustrating. Nine faculty members (37.9%) concurred that preparing for an online course on a weekly basis required more time than for an in-person course.

DISCUSSION

Evaluating professor and student happiness was the primary goal of the study. According to the results of the current survey, vast majority of students expressed great satisfaction with online instruction. This study suggests that because online learners are typically thought to be self-motivated, they inevitably grow more content with their education.1113

The study findings are supported by a similar study, where the students were satisfied with the communication and flexibility afforded during online learning.14

In terms of faculty satisfaction, the majority of the faculty members were only moderately satisfied mainly due to the technical difficulties, longer duration for preparation and motivating the students through online was challenging. This is consistent with a similar study where the areas of dissatisfaction expressed by faculty was due to heavy workload, technical problems and longer preparation time.15,16

CONCLUSION

Online learning has shown to be an effective and practical way to provide curriculum during COVID-19. Online learning ability to offer effective communication and flexibility has been connected to rising student satisfaction. On the other hand, technical support and the excitement of the students increased the level of faculty satisfaction with online instruction. The challenges cited by faculty were increased effort, lengthier preparation times and technical issues.

Cite this article:

Ponnambalam S, Prakash SNS. Assessment of the Level of Satisfaction with Online Teaching and Learning among Faculty and Students at Selected Health Sciences College, Puducherry. J Young Pharm. 2025;17(1):86-8.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to acknowledge Ms. Aarthi G, Ms. Aarthi K, Mr. Adaikalairenish S, Mr. Anbukarasi R, Mr. Arul Kumar K, Ms. Aruna N for the compilation of data and analysis.

References

  1. Kaur N, Dwivedi D, Arora J, Gandhi A. Study of the effectiveness of e-learning to conventional teaching in medical undergraduates amid COVID-19 pandemic. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2020;10(7):563-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine. 2021;100(7) [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawadi S, Giri RA, Simkhada P. Impact of COVID-19 on the Education Sector in Nepal: Challenges and Coping Strategies. Online Submission. 2020 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hurtubise L, Hall E, Sheridan L, Han H. The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2015;2 JMECD-S23895 [Google Scholar]
  5. Shahzad A, Hassan R, Aremu AY, Hussain A, Lodhi RN. Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality& quantity. 2021;55:805-26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shahzad Hassan R, Aremu AV. Hussain effects of COVID 19 IN E LEARNING on higher education institutions. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coman C, Ţîru LG, Meseşan-Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10367 [Google Scholar]
  8. Armstrong-Mensah E, Ramsey-White K, Yankey B, Self-Brown S. COVID-19 and distance learning: Effects on Georgia State University school of public health students. Frontiers in public health. 2020:547 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolliger DU, Halupa C. Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Educ. 2012;33(1):81-98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolliger DU, Inan FA, Wasilik O. Development and validation of the online instructor satisfaction measure (OISM). J Educ Technol Soc. 2014;17(2):183-95. [Google Scholar]
  11. Clarke A. E-Learning Skills. 2004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eom SB, Ashill N. The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decis Sci J Innov Educ. 2016;14:185-215. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang C-H, Shannon DM, Ross ME. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Educ. 2013;34:302-23. [Google Scholar]
  14. Elshami W, Taha MH, Abuzaid M, Saravanan C, Al Kawas S, Abdalla ME, et al. Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1920090 [Google Scholar]
  15. Al-Zahrani AM. Faculty satisfaction with online teaching in Saudi Arabia’s higher education institutions. Int J Instructional Technol Distance Learning. 2015;12(4):17-28. [Google Scholar]
  16. Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Masa’deh R. Evaluating E-learning systems success: an empirical study. Array. 2020;102:67-86. [Google Scholar]