ABSTRACT
Background
Simarouba glauca belonging to the Simaroubaceae family and rich in quassinoids was traditionally used to treat cancer. Our aim is to quantify quassinoid in its leaf’s bioactive extract and perform in vitro screening to assess its potential against breast cancer.
Materials and Methods:
The ultrasonic assisted extraction was used to prepare chloroform, methanol and aqueous leaf extracts of Simarouba glauca, phytochemical and spectral characterizations were performed. The quassinoid enriched methanol fraction was subjected to an in vitro anti-proliferative assay against MDA-MB 231 breast adenocarcinoma cell line.
Results
The fingerprint analysis indicated that glaucarubinone was isolated from methanol fraction 4 of Simarouba glauca leaf with an Rf value of 0.22, closer to the standard Rf (0.24). Liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis indicated that the isolated glaucarubinone peak was observed at m/z 496.33 g/mol [M+H]. In vitro cytotoxicity assay results showed that all three extracts were proved cytotoxic in nature, with IC50 values of 123.05 μg/mL, 117.81 μg/ mL and 155.06 μg/mL respectively on the breast adenocarcinoma cell line.
Conclusion
This study concluded that glaucarubinone quassinoid is present in the methanol fraction. Further, it possessed anti-cancer potential against MDA-MB 231 breast adenocarcinoma cell line.
INTRODUCTION
Breast cancer is the second most prevalent type of cancer in women.1 The compromised immune system brought in by radiation and surgery, together with its high expense, contributes to the growing cancer burden worldwide.2 One strategy to decrease the incidence of cancer globally is to find a greater availability of innovative anticancer phytomolecules that can be combined with chemotherapy. Because evidence-based, safe and effective are thought to be useful in treating and preventing a wide range of illnesses.3,4
The Simarouba glauca leaf is a member of the Simaroubaceae family, also referred to as “Laxmitaru,” “Paradise tree,” or dysentery bark.5 The leaf decoction of SG has been claimed to anticancer, antimalarial, antiviral, antibacterial and anthelmintic properties in traditional medicine.6 Quassinoids of SG include dehydroglaucarubinone, glaucarubine, glaucarubolone, glaucarubinone,benzoquinone, holacanthone, melianone, canthin, simaroubidin, simarolide, simarubin, simarubolide, sitosterol and tirucalla.7 Quassinoids are triterpene lactones used in folk medicine for their pharmacological properties and seem to be well documented.8 Anticancer studies on the crude leaf decoction of SG have been recorded but have not been proven scientifically. Furthermore, in folk practice, the aqueous leaf decoction of SG has to be prepared daily, which leads to non-compliance.
The current research has been focused on the isolation of a novel lead phytochemical, ‘Quassinoid’ in the extract of Simarouba glauca leaf and evaluating the anticancer potential of the isolated extract using an in vitro assay against the MDA-MB 231 breast adenocarcinoma cell line.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All chemicals used for this research were of analytical grade from Pure Chemicals, Loba Chemicals and Merck; Standard Quassinoid-Glaucarubinone was from (NCI) Frederick, 21702, United States. MTT (Himedia), all cell culture reagents and disposable dishes were purchased from Thermo Scientific, Olympus and Tarson’s India Limited respectively. MDA MB-231 cell lines were purchased from NCCS in Pune. FTIR, UV-Spectrophotometer (1650 PC Shimadzu, Japan), UPLC (Waters, USA), Acetonitrile and CDCl3 (Sigma Aldrich), NMR spectrometer (BRUKER 400MHz), Superfit Vacuum Rotary Evaporator, HPTLC (Camag, Muttenz, Switzerland), Digital Ultra Bath Sonicator (Labman Scientific).
Collection and Authentication of Simarouba glauca leaves
Fresh leaves of Simarouba glauca were collected from the herbal garden maintained and voucher specimens were stored by PSG College of Pharmacy, PSGIMSR and Hospital Campus, Coimbatore, India. Plant were identified and authenticated (BSI/ SRC/5/23/2021/Tech./3L8) by plant taxonomist Dr. M. U. Sharief, Botanical Survey of India (BSI), TNAU Campus, Coimbatore, Collected SG leaves were washed with tap water to remove the dust and adhering debris before being shade dried and pulverized into coarse powder for the extraction process.
Extract Preparation
Simarouba glauca leaf extracts (chloroform, methanol and aqueous) were produced using a Digital ultra-bath sonicator and temperature controller (Frequency 40 kHz) at 30°C with a power of 60-100W. To maximize the extraction efficiency, the defatted SG leaf marc was extracted using 250 mL of solvents employing fine ultra-wave contact duration of about 40 min. The prepared SG leaf extracts were concentrated using a rotary evaporator and calculate the percentage yield of the SG leaf extracts.9
Qualitative Phytochemical analysis
The acquired SG leaf extracts performed phytochemical analysis to identify the following phytocompounds such as proteins, alkaloids, glycosides, sterols, terpenoids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, volatile oils and mucilage.10
In vitro anti-proliferative study
The MDA MB-231 cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) high glucose medium. The culture was carried out in a CO2 incubator at 37°C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere and 18-20% O2. SG leaf extracts were assessed for their in vitro antiproliferative potentials using the MTT assay.11 20,000 cells per well were seeded into 96-well plates. Different doses of SG leaf extracts were added (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/mL) and 1 μM/mL of Doxorubicin was used as standard. The plate was incubated for 24 hr at 37°C. After the incubation period, the plates were filled with 0.5 mg/mL MTT reagent. To protect the plate from light, they are covered with aluminium foil and incubated for 3 hr. Then, 100 μL DMSO solution was added to enhance solubility and read the absorbance at 570 nm. Table 1 and Figure 1 provide % cell viability data analysis along with IC50 value of the respective SG leaf extracts.
Culture condition | % Cell viability Chloroform | % Cell viability Methanol | % Cell viability Aqueous |
---|---|---|---|
Untreated | 100±0.09 | 100±0.03 | 100±0.03 |
Dox-1 uM | 54.19±0.02 | 44.92±0.02 | 44.92±0.02 |
12.5 μg | 97.13±0.01 | 91.09±0.02 | 93.38±0.02 |
25 μg | 82.03±0.02 | 81.24±0.01 | 86.35±0.01 |
50 μg | 66.23±0.03 | 69.88±0.01 | 79.89±0.01 |
100 μg | 53.68±0.03 | 54.35±0.08 | 67.74±0.02 |
200 μg | 41.58±0.01 | 23.19±0.03 | 36.37±0.03 |
IC50Conc (μg/mL) | 123.05 | 117.81 | 155.06 |
The IC50 value was calculated using a linear regression equation.
Where,
Y=50, M and C values are taken from the viability.
Chromatographic analysis
Preparative Thin Layer Chromatography
The prepared SG leaf extracts were analyzed using TLC.12 Preparative TLC analysis was done to isolate the quassinoid. The TLC plates were made manually and activated. Then, the bioactive extract of SG leaf was dissolved in methanol and applied to the activated plates for separation of quassinoid. A chromatogram was developed using n-hexane: ethyl acetate (2:8) as a mobile phase. Then the separated chromatograms were marked with 10 distinct colour bands under daylight, at 254 nm and 366 nm using a UV lamp.13 It was scraped off dissolved in methanol and filtered. After the eluent was evaporated, the calculated yield was assigned the following names as Fr1 (220 mg), Fr2 (140 mg), Fr3 (90 mg), Fr4 (190 mg), Fr5 (110 mg), Fr6 (14 mg), Fr7 (19 mg), Fr8 (43 mg), Fr9 (20 mg) and Fr10 (32 mg). The fractions were then stored in eppendorf tubes. Using the HPTLC fingerprint technique, the amount of quassinoid present in bioactive fractions of SG leaf was estimated and displayed in Figure 2.
High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography
SG leaf fractions were subjected to quantification using the HPTLC method. The mobile phase used was n-hexane: ethyl acetate (2:8)14 and standard quassinoid concentrations of 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 μL of (Glaucarubinone). Fingerprint profiles were obtained by scanning the tracks at a wavelength of 254 nm. Table 2 and Figure 2 display 3D overlay, standard and fraction 4 chromatograms with Rf values. The amount of quassinoid in the bioactive fraction (Fr4) of SG leaf, or the QEAF (Quassinoid Enriched Active Fraction), was calculated using a calibration curve with standard quassinoid (GB).
Sl. No. | Particulars | Reports (R f value) |
---|---|---|
Solvent system: n-Hexane – Ethyl acetate (2:8) | ||
1 | Rf value of Standard Quassinoid (Glaucarubinone) | 0.24 |
2 | Fraction 1 (Fr1) | – |
3 | Fraction 2 (Fr2) | 0.05, 0.12 |
4 | Fraction 3 (Fr3) | 0.12, 0.52 |
5 | Fraction 4 (Fr4) | 0.15, 0.22, 0.80 |
6 | Fraction 5 (Fr5) and Fraction 6 (Fr6) | – |
7 | Fraction 7 (Fr7) | 0.05, 0.12, 0.67 |
8 | Fraction 8 (Fr8) | 0.05, 0.34, 0.36, 0.67 |
9 | Fraction 9 (Fr9) | 0.67, 0.78 |
10 | Fraction 10 (Fr10) | 0.13, 0.25, 0.79 |
The values are mean± SD (n=3).
Spectral Characterization
The isolated quassinoid in QEAF of SG leaf was measured for UV absorption spectra at 250 nm. FT-IR analysis was performed and significant functional groups were characterized as illustrated in Table 3. LC-MS phytochemical profiling of isolated quassinoids in QEAF of SG leaf was performed. The compound was identified using the BEH C18 column. The gradient elution was done with solvent A: 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B: acetonitrile. The solvents ratio (A: B) was varied from 0-1 min (A: 98% and B: 2%), 1-6 min (A: 50% and B: 50%), 12-16 min (A: 5% and B: 95%) and 17-20 min (A: 98% and B: 2%). The sample injection volume (QEAF) was set to 5 μL, with a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The m/z was measured at 496 g/mol [M+H],15,16 and shown in Figure 3 and Table 4.13C and 1H NMR analysis of isolated quassinoid in QEAF of SG leaf was predicted by BRUKER 400MHz using CDCl3 as solvent.17,18 The 13C and 1H NMR peaks of the isolated quassinoid in the bioactive fraction of SG leaf are shown in Figure 4.
Wave number (cm-1) | Functional group | Wave number (cm-1) | Functional group |
---|---|---|---|
3371.68 | N-H Stretching | 1284.63 | C-O Stretching |
2933.83 | C-H Stretching | 1232.55 | C-O Stretching |
2730.33 | C=C Stretching | 1210.37 | C-O Stretching |
2340.7 | O=C=O Stretching | 1072.46 | C-O Stretching |
1702.24 | C=O Stretching | 1044.49 | CO-O-CO Stretching |
1612.54 | C=C Stretching | 818.81 | C=C Stretching |
1510.31 | C=C Stretching | 642.32 | C-Br Stretching |
1448.59 | C=C Stretching | 608.56 | C-Br Stretching |
1361.79 | C-H Bending | 551.66 | C-I Stretching |
Time | Flow | %A | %B | Retention Time | Measured mass (m/z) of isolated quassinoids in QEAF of SG leaf | Exact mass (m/z) of known quassinoid (Glaucarubinone) with Molecular formula | Other Fragmented peaks (m/z) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial | 0.200 | 98.0 | 2.0 | 12.113 min | 496.3326 | 494.5 g/mol (495) C25H34O10 | 104.1260, 184.0909, 330.3490, 497.3362 |
1.00 | 0.200 | 98.0 | 2.0 | ||||
6.00 | 0.200 | 50.0 | 50.0 | ||||
12.00 | 0.200 | 5.0 | 95.0 | 12.315 min | 496.3326 | 494.5 g/mol (495) C25H34O10 | 313.2817, 421.2737, 465.2990 |
16.00 | 0.200 | 5.0 | 95.0 | ||||
17.00 | 0.200 | 98.0 | 2.0 | ||||
20.00 | 0.200 | 98.0 | 2.0 |
RESULTS
Authentication and Preparation of leaf extracts of Simarouba glauca
Simarouba glauca is an evergreen flowering tree belongs to the Simaroubaceae family. The current investigations used with SG leaves were collected from the PSGCP Herbal Garden, India. It was acknowledged and authenticated (No.BSI/SRC/5/23/2021/Tech./328) from plant taxonomist Dr. M. U. SHARIEF, Botanical Survey of India (BSI), TNAU Campus. The percentage yields of Simarouba glauca leaf extracts (chloroform, methanol and aqueous) obtained from UAE (Ultrasonic assisted extraction) method. In this study highest percentage (%) w/w yield was obtained from aqueous SG leaf (23.08%) when compared to other two extracts chloroform (9.18%) and methanol (15.84%) respectively.
Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis
The prepared SG leaf extracts were subjected to phytochemical analysis and they showed the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, glycosides, saponins, terpenoids, tannins, steroids and proteins. However, alkaloids, terpenoids and steroids were absent from the aqueous SG leaf extract. Saponins and carbohydrates were absent from the chloroform and methanol SG leaf extracts.
In vitro anti-proliferative assay
In vitro cytotoxicity assay of Simarouba glauca leaf extracts was done using MTT assay and the results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. All were effectively cytotoxic with significant IC50 values of 123.05 μg/mL, 117.81 μg/mL and 155.06 μg/mL on MDA-MB 231 respectively. The results suggested that methanol SG leaf extract proved to possess effective cytotoxic potentials on MDA MB 231 cells with an IC50 value of 117.81 ug/mL. Chloroform and aqueous SG leaf extracts were observed to have moderate cytotoxic potentials. Hence, the valuable bioactive extract was found to be methanol SG leaf extract. Hence, it was purified and isolated through the preparative TLC method.
Chromatography analysis
The quantification of quassinoid content in 10 distinct fractions of the bioactive SG leaf extract was achieved via the HPTLC fingerprint technique. The mobile phase, hexane-ethyl acetate (2:8), was chosen based on the TLC study. Afterward, the quassinoid chemical compound found in the bioactive SG leaf extract was isolated using a preparative TLC study. The calibration curve was generated in HPTLC using different concentrations of standard quassinoid (GB) and to determine the amount of quassinoid (12.573 μg) present in the SG leaf fraction (Fr4). The results of this technique demonstrate that the separated quassinoids in fraction 4 of the bioactive extract’s SG leaf had an Rf value of 0.22, which is comparable to the Rf value of 0.24 found for standard quassinoids. The standard and the bioactive fraction 4 chromatograms with Rf values and 3D overlay are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2.
Spectral Characterization
The UV absorption spectrum (λmax) of isolated Quassinoid in Enriched Active Fraction 4 (QEAF) of SG leaf was seen at 250 nm. FT-IR analysis was employed to analyze the functional groups of the isolated quassinoid in QEAF. Table 3 shown the outcome of the IR functional groups interpretations of bioactive SG leaf fraction 4.
The Mass spectra of the isolated quassinoid peak were observed at m/z 496.33 g/mol [M+H], as well as other fragmented peaks (m/z) were also measured with a retention period of 12.113 min and their m/z values were annotated in positive mode and shown in Figure 3 and Table 4. This study compares the measured mass value m/z, 496 of the isolated quassinoid found in the QEAF of SG leaf to the precise mass value of a known quassinoid (Glaucarubinone) 495 g/mol.
13C and 1H NMR spectra of isolated quassinoid in QEAF of Simarouba glauca leaf was predicated by BRUKER 400MHz using CDCl3 as solvent. The respective peaks associated with quassinoids (Glaucarubinone) present in the QEAF of SG leaf are recorded in Figure 4. Chemical shift (ppm) values of 13C and 1H NMR are as follows:13C NMR (δ ppm): 7.5 (1C, s),10.0 (1C,s), 14.7 (1C,s), 23.0 (1C, s), 24.8 (1C, s), 25.46 (1C, s),31.3 (1C,s), 32.9 (1C,s), 41.6 (1C, s), 44.4 (1C, s), 45.2 (1C, s),45.5 (1C,s), 47.4 (1C,s), 70.0 (1C, s), 71.1 (1C, s), 75.0 (1C, s),76.7 (1C,s), 79.1 (1C, s), 82.9 (1C, s), 108.8 (1C, s), 124.3 (1C, s), 164.5 (1C, s), 166.7 (1C, s), 176.3 (1C, s), 195.9 (1C, s).1H NMR (δ ppm): 0.96 (3H, t), 1.11 (3H, d), 1.20 (3H, s), 1.44 (3H,s), 2.39 (3H, s), 2.02 (4H, m), 2.30 (1H, m), 2.75 (1H, s), 2.97 (2H, m), 3.57 (1H, d), 3.70 (1H, q), 3.96 (1H, q), 4.09 (1H, s), 4.64 (1H, t), 5.23-5.63 (1H, d), 6.15 (1H, m), 7.87 (1H, s).
DISCUSSION
Current research has shown that a powerful phytochemical-rich fraction derived from natural sources is effective against cancer.19 Plant-based anticancer drug discovery stands as a golden mark and gained popularity in the present scenario.20 In addition to this new finding, other studies have shown that treating many tumours with single therapy leads to the development of drug resistance and the failure of the treatments.21 Therefore, there is a growing need for phytomedicine made from natural materials because these phytomolecules are thought to be safer, more cost-effective, effective and supported by evidence for the prevention and treatment of a variety of illnesses.22,23Simarouba glauca is known as the “tree of the solace of cancer,” as the traditional medicinal practitioners employed the leaf decoction to treat the first and second stages of cancer, while the quality of life significantly seems to improve in patients with third and fourth stages of many forms of cancer. It also reduces the negative effects of chemotherapy, minimizes appetite loss and guarantees a speedy recovery without causing adverse effects.24
Early cancer screening performed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 1976 indicated that an alcohol extract of Simarouba root has toxic effects against leukemic cancer cells at very low concentration (less than 20 μg/mL).25 The presence of quassinoids in the Simaroubaceae family is a class of bitter compounds with several biological properties including anticancer activity.26 More research on crude Simarouba glauca leaf decoction has been done and the literature review reveals that the crude methanolic SG leaf extract possesses significant anticancer potentials.27–30 The overall observation of this study, the initial process starts with the collection and authentication of Simarouba glauca (SG) leaves. Then, Chloroform, methanol and aqueous extracts of Simarouba glauca leaves were prepared by the eco-friendly ultrasonic extraction method. In this study, the highest percentage (%) w/w yield was obtained from aqueous SG leaf (23.08%) when compared to the other two extracts, chloroform (9.18%) and methanol (15.84%) respectively. The prepared SG leaf extracts were subjected to phytochemical analysis and they showed the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, glycosides, saponins, terpenoids, tannins, steroids and proteins.
In vitro, an anti-proliferative assay of Simarouba glauca leaf extracts (chloroform, methanol and aqueous) was done using the MTT method. All three SG leaf extracts were effectively cytotoxic with significant IC50 values of 123.05 μg/mL, 117.81 μg/mL and 155.06 μg/mL on Human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB 231) respectively. The results suggested that methanol SG leaf extract proved to possess effective anti-breast cancer potentials on MDA MB 231 cells with an IC50 value of 117.81 ug/mL compared to other SG leaf extracts (chloroform and aqueous). Furthermore, a qualitative TLC study was carried out using different solvent systems such as n-hexane: ethyl acetate (2:8), chloroform: methanol (3:7), chloroform: methanol (5:5) and chloroform: methanol (7:3). The best solvent was chosen for further chromatography studies both preparative TLC and HPTLC. In these techniques, hexane-ethyl acetate (2:8) was used as a mobile phase to isolate and estimate the quantity of quassinoid from 10 different fractions of the bioactive SG leaf extract. The outcome of this approach proves that the amount of quassinoid in fraction 4 of the Simarouba glauca leaf of the bioactive extract was determined and the Rf value of bioactive Fr4 was found to be 0.22 which is close to the 0.24 Rf value of the standard quassinoid. The UV absorption spectrum (λmax) of isolated Quassinoid Enriched Active Fraction 4 (QEAF) of SG leaf was seen at 250 nm. The FT-IR spectra, 13C and 1H NMR spectral characterization were done for structure elucidation. In LC-MS, the spectrum of the isolated quassinoid peak was observed at m/z 496.33 g/mol [M+H]. This study compares the measured mass value m/z, 496 g/mol of the isolated quassinoid found in the QEAF of SG leaf to the precise mass value of a known quassinoid (Glaucarubinone) which is m/z 495 g/mol.
CONCLUSION
At the outset, this particular research was undertaken based on the earlier reports and the inspiration to overcome hurdles in folk practice and scientific evidence to prove the standardized systematic study has not been done till date. Hence, the extraction process needed a change over from conventional to an eco-friendly greener manner using the modern ultrasonic assisted approach of extract preparation by avoiding excess usage of solvents in a much lesser time and for increased percentage yield was followed as the prime process. The current research has proved scientifically that the novel quassinoid, glaucarubinone from Simarouba glauca leaf has been identified through the HPTLC fingerprint technique also to evaluate the anti-proliferative potentials of novel glaucarubinone quassinoid; present in the active fraction of Simarouba glauca leaf is very much complementing. Futuristic studies will be concentrated on proving the underlying mechanism so that the process may be fruitful for the management and treatment of breast cancer.
Cite this article:
Subburaj V, Umaa K, Sankar V. Phyto-chemicals and Spectral Characterization of Novel Glaucarubinone Quassinoid from Simarouba glaucaLeaves: In vitro Anti-proliferative Potential against Breast Adenocarcinoma Cell line. J Young Pharm. 2025;17(1):89-96.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to the Principal and Management of PSG College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu for providing the facilities and other research assistance towards the completion of this research work. The authors are thankful to Dr. John A. Beutler, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Chemotherapeutics Repository, Molecular Targets Laboratory, Frederick, USA, for providing Glaucarubinone. The authors are also thankful to The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University for the support given during the PhD research process.
ABBREVIATIONS
SG | Simarouba glauca |
---|---|
MTT | 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)- 2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide |
MDA-MB 231 | M.D. Anderson and Metastasis Breast cancer |
TLC | Thin Layer Chromatography |
Prep TLC | Preparative Thin Layer Chromatography |
IC50 | Inhibitory concentration 50 |
HPTLC | High Performance Thin layer chromatography |
FT-IR | Fourier transmission infrared spectra |
UV | Ultra Violet |
LC-MS | Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry |
13C and 1H NMR | Carbon 13 and proton Nuclear magnetic resonance |
DMEM | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium |
DMSO | Dimethyl sulfoxide |
UPLC | Ultra-performance liquid chromatography |
CDCl3 | Deuterated chloroform |
PSGCP | PSG College of Pharmacy |
BSI | Botanical Survey of India |
TNAU | Tamil Nadu Agricultural University |
Rf | Retention factor |
NCCS | National Centre for Cell Science |
CO2 | Carbon dioxide 2 |
Fr | Fraction |
GB | Glaucarubinone |
TOF MS ES+ | Positive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry |
QEAF | Quassinoids Enriched Active Fraction |
UAE | Ultrasonic Assisted Extraction |
H | Hydrogen |
ppm | Parts per Million |
NCI | National Cancer Institute |
TCN | Tricaproin |
References
- Sobhani N, D’Angelo A, Pittacolo M, Roviello G, Miccoli A, Corona SP, et al. Updates on the CDK4/6 inhibitory strategy and combinations in breast cancer. Cells. 2019;2019:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Yue GG, Wong LS, Leung HW, Gao S, Tsang JY, Lin ZX, et al. Evaluation of the safety profiles of estrogenic Chinese herbal medicines in breast cancer. Phytomedicine. 2019;2019:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Jose A, Kannan E, Vijaya Kumar PR, Madhunapantula SV. Therapeutic potential of phytochemicals isolated from DC for inhibiting cancers: a review. Syst Rev Pharm. 2018;2018:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Gunasekaran T, Haile T, Nigusse T, Dhanaraju MD. Nanotechnology: an effective tool for enhancing bioavailability and bioactivity of phytomedicine. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(Suppl 1) 201420 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Armour RP. Investigations on DC. in El Salvador. Econ Bot. 1959;1959:19 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Dony EC, Mamatha GS, Srivastava M. Therapeutic potential of in treatment of Oral diseases. Res J Pharm Technol. 2023;2023:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Sameer S, Sudhakar M. Molecular docking and ADME analysis for Anti – HIV1 potential of quassinoids from . Pharm Clin Res. 2020;2020:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Fiaschetti G, Grotzer MA, Shalaby T, Castelletti D, Arcaro A. Quassinoids: from traditional drugs to new cancer therapeutics. Curr Med Chem. 2011;2011:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Tatke P, Rajan M. Comparison of conventional and novel extraction techniques for the extraction of scopoletin from . Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2014;2014:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kokate CK. Practical pharmacognosy. 2005:10-7. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Karuppaiah A, Siram K, Selvaraj D, Ramasamy M, Babu D, Sankar V, et al. Synergistic and enhanced anticancer effect of a facile surface modified non-cytotoxic silver nanoparticle conjugated with gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer cells. Mater Today Commun. 2020;2020:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods. 1973:148 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Sherma J. Fried B (Chapter 2). Preparative thin layer chromatography. In: Journal of chromatography library. 1987;1987:19 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kholiya F, Bhatt N, Rathod MR, Meena R, Prasad K. Fundamental studies on the feasibility of deep eutectic solvents for the selective partition of glaucarubinone present in the roots of . J Sep Sci. 2015;2015:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Gogoi J, Nakhuru KS, Policegoudra RS, Chattopadhyay P, Rai AK, Veer V, et al. Isolation and characterization of bioactive components from L radix. J Trad Complement Med. 2016;2016:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Khalaf HA, Abbas IS, Tawfeeq AA, Mahdi MF. Determination, isolation and identification of aucubin and verbascoside in the leaves of Iraqi L. using different detecting methods. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018:74-80. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Polonsky J, Varon Z, Jacquemin H, Pettit GR. The isolation and structure of 13, 18 dehydroglaucarubinone, a new antineoplastic quassinoids from . Experientia. 1978;1978:19 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Waterman PG, Ampofo SA. Cytotoxic quassinoids from stem bark: isolation and high-field NMR. Planta Med. 1984;1984:19 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Jose A, Kannan E, Madhunapantula SV. Anti-proliferative potential of phytochemical fractions isolated from DC Leaf. Heliyon. 2020;6(4) [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Das AP, Agarwal SM. Recent advances in the area of plant-based anti-cancer drug discovery using computational approaches. Mol Divers. 2024;2024:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Khan SU, Fatima K, Aisha S, Malik F. Unveiling the mechanisms and challenges of cancer drug resistance. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;2024:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nasim N, Sandeep IS, Mohanty S. Plant-derived natural products for drug discovery: current approaches and prospects. Nucleus (Calcutta). 2022;2022:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- . Plant-derived natural products as leads for Drug Discovery. Plant-derived natural products. 2009:547-67. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Shyamsundar J. Bangalore: University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics. 1970 [[cited Mar 18 2024]]. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uasbcp/43624.html. Array.
- Mahesh CD, Padyanna S, Manjunath JS. Array. J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2021;2021:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Vikas B, Akhil BS, Suja SR, Sujathan K. An Exploration of Phytochemicals from Simaroubaceae. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;2017:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Puranik SI, Ghagane SC, Nerli RB, Jalalpure SS, Hiremath MB. Evaluation of antioxidant and anticancer activity of leaf extracts on T-24 Bladder Cancer Cell Line. Pharmacogn J. 2017;2017:20 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Jose A, Chaitanya MV, Kannan E, Madhunapantula SV. Tricaproin isolated from inhibits the growth of human colorectal carcinoma cell lines by targeting class-1 histone deacetylases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;2018:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Prajapati C, Reddy N, Bhatt M. Evaluation of anticancer activity using leaf extract of on leukemic cancer cell lines. Int J Bot Stud. 2018;2018:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Mathew SE, Ramavarma SK, Babu TD, Kuzhivelil BT, Raghavamenon AC. Preliminary assessment on phytochemical composition, cytotoxic and antitumor efficacy of DC leaf methanolic extract. Annals Phytomed Int J. 2019;8(2) [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]