ABSTRACT
Drug interactions represent a significant challenge in modern medicine, as the concomitant use of multiple medications is prevalent in-patient care. Understanding the mechanisms behind drug interactions, accurately assessing their occurrence and adopting effective management strategies are critical to optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing adverse events. This research paper provides a comprehensive review of drug interactions, focusing on their underlying mechanisms, methods for assessment and the implementation of management strategies in clinical practice.
INTRODUCTION
The co-organization of numerous prescriptions, known as polypharmacy, has become progressively normal in current clinical practice.1 This pattern is driven by the developing pervasiveness of ongoing illnesses, a maturing populace and progressions in clinical science prompting the improvement of a wide exhibit of remedial specialists. Be that as it may, with the utilization of various medications, the potential for drug cooperation additionally rises fundamentally. It is prompting either upgraded or reduced restorative impacts or an expanded chance of unfavorable responses. Grasping the basic instruments of these communications, surveying their event and taking on suitable administration techniques are fundamental for protected and successful patient consideration.
Drug connections can have significant clinical ramifications, influencing treatment results and patient security. Drug connections can either improve or lessen the helpful adequacy of prescriptions. A few connections can prompt expanded viability, taking into consideration lower measurements or further developed treatment results. On the other hand, certain cooperation’s might reduce drug adequacy, prompting therapy disappointment or sub-standard control of ailments. Drug communications can expand the gamble of unfriendly responses, including incidental effects, harmfulness and unfavorably susceptible responses. Such responses can result from pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic cooperation’s, which might have extreme ramifications for the patient’s well-being. Unnoticed medication associations can prompt treatment disappointment or insufficient infection of the executives.2 This can bring about persistent non-adherence to therapy regimens and worsening of ailments. Drug cooperation’s, it is clinical intercessions, hospitalizations, or longer treatment lengths to address the results of unfavorable communications. The incidence of drug- drug interaction amongst Indian populations varies from 8.3% to 60%. Broad utilization of meds and the potential for drug cooperation’s present general well-being concerns, requiring the requirement for medical services suppliers to be careful in perceiving and overseeing such connections.
This is exhaustively inspecting the system’s basic medication cooperation’s, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic connections, to improve the comprehension of how medications can associate with each other.3 it investigates the elements affecting the event of medication communications, like polypharmacy, hereditary varieties, age-related changes and sickness states, among others. They assess the different strategies and devices accessible for the evaluation of medication communications, both in preclinical and clinical settings and to feature their assets and impediments. We need to research the clinical ramifications of medication connections, including unfriendly impacts, diminished treatment adequacy and the effect on persistent consistence and medical care costs. It will distinguish and talk about the best administration methodologies for drug connections, including aversion and anticipation, helpful medication checking, patient schooling and interdisciplinary cooperation. The current contextual analyses show genuine instances of medication communications and their administration in clinical practice. We examine on the likely future bearings in the field of medication collaborations, including customized medication, pharmacogenomics and the coordination of cutting-edge innovations, for example, man-made brainpower and AI.
Mechanisms of Drug Interactions
These collaborations can prompt changes in the plasma focus and bioavailability of the impacted medication, at last affecting its remedial impacts and likely unfavorable responses. Retention collaborations happen when one medication influences the rate or degree of ingestion of one more medication from the site of the organization into the fundamental flow. This can occur through different components, like modifying gastrointestinal motility, gastric pH, or the action of medication carriers in the stomach wall. Example: The attendant utilization of acid neutralizers with specific anti-microbials, similar to antibiotic medications, can lessen their retention by chelating with the metal particles in the stomach settling agents. Conveyance communications include changes in the volume of circulation or the limiting of medication to plasma proteins or tissues. Drug removal from plasma protein-restricting destinations can build the free (unbound) convergence of the impacted medication, possibly prompting upgraded pharmacological impacts or harmfulness.4
Digestion cooperation’s happen when one medication influences the biotransformation of another medication, basically in the liver by compounds like Cytochrome P450 (CYP) chemicals. Cooperation’s can include catalyst restraint or enlistment, prompting modifications in the digestion and leeway of the impacted medication. Example: Co-organization of the energizer fluoxetine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor) with codeine (a prodrug used by CYP2D6 to its dynamic structure, morphine) can bring about diminished pain-relieving impacts because of diminished codeine change to morphine.
Disposal communications include changes in the renal or hepatic leeway of medications. These communications can prompt modified drug half-life and possibly influence drug amassing or restorative adequacy. Example: The corresponding utilization of probenecid, a medication used to treat gout, can lessen the renal freedom of penicillin anti-microbial, prompting delayed anti-toxin openness and working on restorative results. Pharmacodynamic cooperation’s happens when two medications with comparable or contradicting impacts associate at the receptor or target site, bringing about changes in the pharmacological reaction.5 Receptor communications happen when drugs with comparable or various instruments of activity tie to something very similar or related receptors. This can prompt added substance, synergistic, or opposing impacts. Example: The blend of beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for hypertension treatment can deliver an added substance resulting in decreasing circulatory strain by following up on various pathways associated with pulse guidelines.
Pharmacodynamic communications can likewise include drugs that influence chemical action, prompting the regulation of natural cycles. Example: Acetaminophen and liquor are both utilized by a similar liver protein and the co-organization of liquor can expand the development of harmful metabolites of acetaminophen, prompting liver harm. Particle channel collaborations include drugs that influence particle channels, which assume an urgent part in the age and engendering of activity possibilities in edgy cells like neurons and muscle cells. Example: Quinidine, an antiarrhythmic prescription that blocks potassium channels, can prompt an expanded gamble of serious arrhythmias when utilized in blend with different medications that likewise influence heart particle channels.6 Carrier communications happen when medications repress or instigate drug carriers, influencing different medications. Example: The stimulant sertraline restrains the P-glycoprotein carrier, which can prompt expanded centralizations of specific medications that are substrates of this carrier, possibly causing drug harmfulness. Understanding both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic communications is essential for anticipating and overseeing potential medication cooperation’s to guarantee protected and powerful drug treatment. Medical care experts should be watchful in recognizing and dealing with these associations to limit the frameworks. Pharmacokinetic interactions of drug interaction are depicted in Figure 1.
Factors Influencing Drug Interactions
Polypharmacy alludes to the utilization of various prescriptions at the same time to oversee at least one ailment in a solitary patient. This training is predominant, particularly in more established grown-ups and patients with complicated or ongoing ailments. The potential for drug associations increments altogether with polypharmacy because of the more noteworthy probability of medications interfacing with one another, prompting changed pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Outcomes of polypharmacy-related drug collaborations might incorporate decreased treatment adequacy, expanded hazard of unfriendly medication responses, prescription non-adherence and higher medical care costs. Medical care suppliers ought to painstakingly survey a patient’s prescription routine, taking into account the potential for drug connections and expect to work on the therapy plan at whatever point conceivable while guaranteeing ideal helpful results.7 Hereditary varieties among people can essentially affect drug digestion and reaction, prompting interindividual changeability in drug cooperation’s. Certain hereditary polymorphisms can influence the action of medication processing catalysts (e.g., CYP450 compounds) and medication carriers, prompting changed drug focuses and reactions.
Age-related physiological changes can impact drug connections. More seasoned grown-ups, for instance, may encounter changes in liver and kidney capability, prompting modified drug digestion and end. Age-related changes in body organization and diminished hepatic blood stream can influence drug dissemination too. Moreover, geriatric patients might have comorbidities requiring different prescriptions, further expanding the potential for drug collaborations.8 Infection states can change drug digestion and reaction, adding to medicate connections. For instance, patients with liver or kidney brokenness might encounter changes in drug freedom, prompting expanded drug fixations and expected poisonousness. It is ailments and change prescription regimens likewise, taking into account potential medication collaborations and their effect on illness the board.
Food can collaborate with meds, influencing their ingestion, circulation, digestion, or end. Certain food varieties can adjust gastric pH, collaborate with drug carriers, or hinder drug-processing proteins, prompting changes in drug bioavailability and adequacy. For instance, drinking grapefruit juice can hinder CYP3A4, a vital protein liable for utilizing different medications. This hindrance can prompt expanded drug levels in the body, possibly causing unfriendly impacts or diminishing medication viability. Medical care suppliers ought to instruct patients about food-drug collaborations and give direction on fitting timing and organization of meds concerning feasts to limit their effect.
Spice drug collaborations happen when natural enhancements or plant items interface with endorsed prescriptions. Home grown items can contain dynamic mixtures that can impede drug digestion or cooperate with drug targets, prompting changed drug impacts. A few home-grown enhancements might instigate drug-utilizing chemicals, possibly decreasing medication levels and compromising treatment viability.9 Then again, certain spices can repress drug-processing catalysts, prompting expanded drug focuses and likely poisonousness. Patients ought to illuminate their medical services suppliers about any home grown supplements they are taking to evaluate the gamble of spice drug collaborations and change prescription regimens on a case-by-case basis to guarantee patient wellbeing and therapy viability. Medical services experts ought to remain informed about expected connections between normally utilized spices and drugs to give fitting direction to patients. Pharmacodynamic Interactions of Drug Interactions are depicted in Figure 2.
Assessment of Drug Interactions
Prior to assessing drug associations in human subjects, preclinical examinations are directed to recognize potential communications involving in vitro and in vivo models. Preclinical evaluation gives significant starter information to direct clinical examinations and helps in recognizing drugs with a high gamble of connections right off the bat in the medication improvement process. In vitro examinations include tests directed externally a living creature, normally utilizing detached cells, tissues, or compound frameworks.10 These investigations are valuable for surveying drug collaborations at the sub-atomic level, for example, catalyst restraint or enactment, drug transport and receptor cooperation. Scientists can utilize human cell lines or tissues communicating drug-using chemicals or carriers to explore likely cooperation. In vitro examinations give unthinking experiences into the idea of medication collaborations and assist in relating to tranquilizing competitors with a high potential for connections.
In vivo creature studies are directed involving live creatures to survey drug connections in a more mind-boggling natural setting. These examinations are particularly useful while concentrating on drug connections including physiological cycles not effortlessly duplicated in vitro models. Creature studies can assess drug collaborations’ pharmacokinetic viewpoints, including assimilation, circulation, digestion and end. They can likewise survey pharmacodynamic associations by estimating the joined impacts of two medications on unambiguous targets or physiological reactions. After preclinical appraisal, clinical examinations are directed in human subjects to additionally explore and approve potential medication collaborations saw in preclinical models. Clinical evaluation assumes an imperative part in grasping this present reality ramification of medication connections and their effect on quiet results.
Pharmacokinetic concentrates on center around the quantitative examination of medication fixations in natural examples after some time. These examinations mean to survey changes in drug digestion and disposal brought about by attendant medication organization. Normal pharmacokinetic studies incorporate medication drug association preliminaries, where one medication’s pharmacokinetics is assessed in the presence and nonappearance of another medication. These investigations give experiences into what medications interface and how they mean for one another’s assimilation, digestion and discharge. Pharmacodynamic studies investigate the joined impacts of at least two medications on unambiguous pharmacological targets or physiological reactions. These examinations intend to evaluate how medications communicate at the cell and tissue levels to create noticed clinical outcomes.
Pharmacodynamic studies might include evaluating changes in biomarkers, physiological boundaries, or clinical results when medications are controlled together. These examinations help in grasping the possible synergistic or hostile impacts of medication mixes. Case reports and observational examinations assume a critical part in distinguishing and grasping medication connections in certifiable clinical settings. Medical care experts report unforeseen medication collaborations and unfriendly occasions in individual patients, giving significant data to additional examination. Observational investigations including enormous patient populaces can recognize relationship between drug blends and unfavorable results, assisting with identifying already obscure connections. These examinations are especially important for uncommon or unforeseen cooperation that may not be caught in controlled clinical preliminaries. Drug communication data sets arrange and unite data from preclinical and clinical examinations, case reports and different sources to furnish medical services experts with far reaching and effectively available data about potential medication connections. These data sets sort drug cooperation in light of their systems, seriousness and supporting proof. Medical services suppliers can counsel these data sets to distinguish likely communications and arrive at informed conclusions about prescription regimens, particularly in patients getting different medications simultaneously. Factors of Drug Interactions are depiced in Figure 3.
Management Strategies for Drug Interactions
Evasion and counteraction methodologies intend to limit the gamble of medication connections via cautiously thinking about the selection of prescriptions and their doses, particularly when patients are recommended various medications all the while. They are a few meds and potential gamble factors for drug cooperation prior to recommending new prescriptions. Reasonable medication determination includes picking drugs with lower potential for associations while conceivable, taking into account factors like the medication’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.11 For instance, choosing drugs with various metabolic pathways or utilizing drugs with a wide helpful record can diminish the probability of huge medication communications. At times, drug cooperation can be overseen by changing the measurements of one or both communicating drugs. Portion change guarantees that helpful medication focuses are kept up with while limiting the potential for unfriendly impacts. Portion changes can be founded on variables like the patient’s age, renal or hepatic capability, hereditary profile and co-regulated prescriptions.
Whenever the situation allows, medical services suppliers can consider endorsing elective meds that don’t communicate with a patient’s ongoing drugs. Subbing drugs with comparative remedial impacts however unique metabolic pathways or receptor targets can assist with keeping away from possible connections. Helpful options ought to be painstakingly assessed for adequacy, well-being and patient-explicit variables prior to rolling out any improvements in the treatment plan. Restorative medication checking includes estimating drug fixations in a patient’s blood to guarantee that medication levels stay inside the remedial reach. TDM is especially helpful for drugs with a tight restorative file, where little changes in drug focuses can fundamentally affect viability and security. Ordinary TDM can assist with distinguishing drug collaborations early and guide portion acclimations to upgrade treatment results while limiting the gamble of antagonistic occasions. Patient training and directing assume an essential part in forestalling and overseeing drug collaborations. Medical care suppliers ought to instruct patients about the significance of uncovering all prescriptions, including non-prescription medications, enhancements and natural items, to their medical services group. Patients ought to be educated about potential medication collaborations and encouraged to report any new or strange side effects immediately.12 Enabling patients with information about their drugs and potential associations can further develop medicine adherence and patient well-being. Open correspondence among medical care colleagues guarantees that appropriate data about meds and potential collaborations is shared, considering thorough and facilitated patient consideration.
The use of drug interaction software and tools can aid healthcare professionals in identifying potential drug interactions efficiently. These tools analyze medication regimens and flag possible interactions, providing real-time alerts and recommendations. Drug interaction databases, as mentioned earlier, are valuable resources that can be integrated into Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems or pharmacy management software. These tools support informed decision-making and enhance related to drug interactions.
Clinical Implications of Drug Interactions
Drug communications can prompt unfavorable impacts and expanded hazard of poisonousness. At the point when at least two medications collaborate, their consolidated consequences for the body can be flighty, possibly prompting extreme or perilous responses. Antagonistic impacts might incorporate gastrointestinal unsettling influences, hypersensitive responses, cardiovascular occasions, focal sensory system aggravations, or organ harmfulness.13 For instance, joining specific antidepressants with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) can bring about serotonin disorder, a possibly perilous condition described by disturbance, hyperthermia and autonomic flimsiness. Forestalling and overseeing drug cooperation’s is urgent to limit the gamble of unfriendly impacts and guarantee patient well-being. Drug Interactions on Management Strategies are depicted in Figure 4.
Drug cooperation’s can decrease the viability of a medication, delivering it less compelling in treating the expected ailment. Communications might prompt changed drug digestion or diminished drug focuses at the objective site, coming about in sub-standard remedial impacts. For example, joining stomach-settling agents with specific anti-microbials can diminish the anti-toxins assimilation, prompting diminished adequacy in treating bacterial contaminations. Diminished treatment adequacy can bring about deferred side effect alleviation, treatment disappointment, or the requirement for higher medication doses, expanding the gamble of unfavorable impacts. Complex medicine regimens because of medication cooperation’s can prompt rebelliousness, where patients battle to stick to the recommended treatment plan. The weight of taking different prescriptions with explicit timing and measurement prerequisites might overpower patients, prompting skipped portions or conflicting use. Rebelliousness can bring about treatment disappointment, as a lack of medication openness may not accomplish the ideal remedial impact. Furthermore, resistance can fuel ailments, prompting the movement of illnesses and expanding medical care use. Tending to sedate collaborations and working on taking drug regimens can work on persistent adherence and treatment results.14 The presence of medication collaborations can prompt expanded medical services expenses and use. Antagonistic medication occasions coming about because of connections might require extra clinical intercessions, hospitalizations, or crisis division visits. Failures in treatment because of diminished drug viability can prompt delayed illness in the executives and expanded medical services visits, adding to the financial weight on the two patients and medical services frameworks. Forestalling and overseeing drug communications can diminish pointless medical care usage; upgrade therapy productivity and lower medical services costs.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Result 1
Foundation: Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant generally endorsed to forestall blood cluster development.15 It works by restraining vitamin K-subordinate thickening variables. Anti-toxins, like specific cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, can slow down warfarin’s digestion, prompting possibly risky collaborations.
Patient Profile: Mr. Smith, a 70-year-old male with a background marked by atrial fibrillation, is on a steady portion of warfarin to forestall stroke. He fosters a urinary parcel disease and is recommended ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone anti-infection.
Drug Connection System: Ciprofloxacin represses the cytochrome P450 catalyst CYP2C9, liable for warfarin digestion. This hindrance brings about diminished warfarin freedom, prompting an expanded gamble of dying.
Clinical Result: Mr. Smith’s global standardized proportion (INR), a proportion of warfarin’s anticoagulant impact, rises fundamentally subsequent to beginning ciprofloxacin. He encounters indications of dying, for example, simple swelling and draining gums. His warfarin portion is changed and he is firmly observed to successfully deal with the medication collaboration.
The executives Procedure: In patients on warfarin, medical services suppliers ought to consider elective anti-infection agents that don’t impede warfarin digestion. Assuming that there is no reasonable other option, close checking of the patient’s INR and suitable warfarin portion changes are fundamental to forestall draining difficulties. Risk factors and Drug related risk factors are depicted in Figure 5 and 6 respectively.
Result 2
Foundation
Specific Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are ordinarily used to treat sadness and nervousness problems, while Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) are more established antidepressants utilized in specific cases. Joining SSRIs with MAOIs can prompt a perilous connection known as serotonin disorder.
Patient Profile
Ms. Johnson, a 45-year-old female with a background marked by significant burdensome issue, has been taking fluoxetine, a SSRI, for quite some time. Because of insufficient side effect control, her specialist chooses to add phenelzine, a MAOI, to her treatment routine.
Drug Cooperation Component
The two SSRIs and MAOIs increment serotonin levels in the cerebrum through various systems. At the point when taken together, unnecessary serotonin aggregation can prompt serotonin disorder, portrayed by side effects, for example, tumult, disarray, fast pulse and muscle inflexibility.
Clinical Result
Not long after beginning phenelzine, Ms. Johnson creates serotonin condition. She encounters serious unsettling, disarray and quakes and is confessed to the emergency clinic for guaranteed treatment.
The board Procedure
Joining SSRIs and MAOIs is contraindicated because of the gamble of serotonin condition. Prior to exchanging or adding antidepressants, a waste of time of something like fourteen days is prescribed to permit the end of one medication prior to beginning the other. This approach limits the gamble of the serotonin condition.
Result 3
Foundation: Statins, it is prompting an expanded centralization of the medication in the body.
Patient Profile
Mr. Lee, a 60-year-old male with hypercholesterolemia, is endorsed atorvastatin, a statin, to deal with his cholesterol levels. He polishes off grapefruit squeeze day to day for its medical advantages.
Drug Connection Component
Grapefruit juice represses the CYP3A4 catalyst in the stomach wall and liver, lessening the digestion of atorvastatin. This prompts higher medication levels in the circulatory system, expanding the gamble of unfavorable impacts, for example, muscle torment and liver harmfulness.
Clinical Result
Mr. Lee encounters muscle agony and shortcomings soon after beginning atorvastatin. His medical care supplier finds the grapefruit juice utilization and distinguishes the medication collaboration as the reason for the side effects.
The board Procedure
Patients on statins ought to be encouraged to try not to polish off grapefruit or grapefruit juice. On the other hand, patients can change to statins that are not essentially impacted by grapefruit juice digestion. Medical services suppliers should ask about dietary propensities and supplement use to recognize likely collaborations and guarantee safe prescription administration. It concentrates on feature the significance of perceiving and overseeing drug collaborations in clinical practice. Figuring out the components of cooperation’s, recognizing high-risk drug blends and embracing fitting administration procedures are fundamental for enhancing patient security and restorative results. Medical services suppliers ought to remain refreshed with the most recent data on drug communications and proactively teach patients about the dangers related to specific medication mixes or dietary elements.
Future Directions and Emerging Technologies
Through pharmacogenomic testing, medical services suppliers can recognize hereditary varieties that influence drug digestion, adequacy and security. This data empowers them to choose the most suitable prescriptions and doses for every patient, limiting the gamble of medication associations and unfriendly responses. Customized medication and pharmacogenomics can possibly upset drug treatment, upgrading treatment results, lessening antagonistic occasions and further developing patient adherence.16 As how we might interpret hereditary qualities and medication cooperation’s propels, customized medication is probably going to turn into a necessary piece of routine clinical practice.
Nanotechnology has prepared for inventive medication conveyance frameworks that can further develop drug explicitness, bioavailability and diminish the gamble of medication collaborations. Nanoparticles, liposomes and other nanoscale transporters empower designated drug conveyance to explicit cells or tissues, improving restorative viability and limiting askew impacts. By embodying drugs inside nanocarriers, medical care suppliers can accomplish controlled discharge, which can assist with keeping up with steady medication levels and decrease the probability of medication associations. Additionally, nanotechnology offers the chance of co-conveying numerous medications inside a similar transporter, considering mix treatments with diminished drug collaboration potential. The advancement of nanotechnology-based drug conveyance frameworks can possibly upgrade the administration of medication cooperation’s and work on tolerant results by offering more exact and customized drug treatments. Besides, simulated intelligence-controlled choice emotionally supportive networks can give ongoing alarms to medical care suppliers while recommending prescriptions, hailing potential medication associations and proposing elective therapy choices. The combination of man-made intelligence and AI in medical services holds the commitment of upgrading drug security, streamlining therapy regimens and decreasing the event of medication connections, at last prompting worked on tolerant consideration.
CONCLUSION
Drug interactions are complex and multifactorial and their proper understanding is crucial in modern healthcare. This research paper sheds light on the mechanisms underlying drug interactions, explores various assessment methods and provides insights into the implementation of effective management strategies. By acknowledging and addressing drug interactions proactively, healthcare providers can enhance patient safety, optimize treatment outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Further advancements in personalized medicine and emerging technologies will likely contribute to even more precise management of drug interactions in the future.
Cite this article:
Rakshith UR, Nair SP, Ranganath AH, Halagali P. Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Assessment and Management Strategies. J Young Pharm. 2024;16(3):447-55.
ABBREVIATIONS
CYP | Cytochrome P450 |
---|---|
TDM | Therapeutic drug monitoring |
EHR | Electronic health record |
MAOIs | Monoamine oxidase inhibitors |
SSRIs | Specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors. |
References
- Butkiewicz M, Restrepo NA, Haines JL, Crawford DC. DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION PROFILES OF MEDICATION REGIMENS EXTRACTED FROM A DE-IDENTIFIED ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEM. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings [Internet]. 2016;2016:33 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5001747/ [Google Scholar]
- Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med [Internet]. 2018;24(5):541-50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/296 86425/
[Google Scholar] - Molins EAG, Jusko WJ. Assessment of Three-Drug Combination Pharmacodynamic Interactions in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. AAPS J [Internet]. 2018;20(5) Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29951754/
[Google Scholar] - Yadav R, Bulitta JB, Wang J, Nation RL, Landersdorfer CB. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model-Based Optimized Combination Regimens against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Murine Thigh Infection Model by Using Humanized Dosing Schemes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2017;61(12) Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5700304/ [Google Scholar]
- Rieger TR, Allen RJ, Bystricky L, Chen Y, Colopy GW, Cui Y, et al. Improving the generation and selection of virtual populations in quantitative systems pharmacology models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol [Internet]. 2018;139:15-22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29902482/
[Google Scholar] - Yang X, Pfuma Fletcher E, Huang SM, Zineh I, Madabushi R. Regulatory Efforts to Facilitate Evaluation and Clinical Management of Drug-Drug Interaction Risks. Clin Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2021;109(1):42-6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32721040/
[Google Scholar] - Mathialagan S, Feng B, Rodrigues AD, Varma MVS. Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Renal OCT2/MATE Transporters: Clinical Risk Assessment May Require Endogenous Biomarker-Informed Approach. Clin Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2021;110(4):855-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33186483/
[Google Scholar] - Chu X, Liao M, Shen H, Yoshida K, Zur AA, Arya V, et al. Clinical Probes and Endogenous Biomarkers as Substrates for Transporter Drug-Drug Interaction Evaluation: Perspectives From the International Transporter Consortium. Clin Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2018;104(5):836-64. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30 347454/
[Google Scholar] - Ahmad A, Ogungbenro K, Kunze A, Jacobs F, Snoeys J, Rostami-Hodjegan A, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to support qualification of pyridoxic acid as endogenous biomarker of OAT1/3 renal transporters. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol [Internet]. 2021;10(5):467-77. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33704919/
[Google Scholar] - Willemin ME, Van Der Made TK, Pijpers I, Dillen L, Kunze A, Jonkers S, et al. Clinical Investigation on Endogenous Biomarkers to Predict Strong OAT-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions. Clin Pharmacokinet [Internet]. 2021;60(9):1187-99. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33840062/
[Google Scholar] - Vourvahis M, Byon W, Chang C, Le V, Diehl A, Graham D, et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Abrocitinib on Drug Transporters by Integrated Use of Probe Drugs and Endogenous Biomarkers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;112(3):665-75. [Google Scholar]
- King PK, Stump TA, Walkama AM, Ash BM, Bowling SM. Management of Phenobarbital and Apixaban Interaction in Recurrent Cardioembolic Stroke. Ann Pharmacother [Internet]. 2018;52(6):605-6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29457494/
[Google Scholar] - Albers LJ. The Top 100 Drug Interactions: A Guide to Patient Management, 2003 Edition. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2004;38(2):355 [Google Scholar]
- Williamson B, Riley RJ. Hepatic transporter drug-drug interactions: an evaluation of approaches and methodologies. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol [Internet]. 2017;13(12):1237-50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29121476/
[Google Scholar] - Koepsell H. Update on drug-drug interaction at organic cation transporters: mechanisms, clinical impact and proposal for advanced in vitro testing. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021;17(6):635-53. [Google Scholar]
- Smith MC, Ashdown HF, Sheppard JP, Butler CC, Bankhead C. Statin prescription in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and risk of exacerbations: a retrospective cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021;11(12) Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34876426/
[Google Scholar]