Home Full text Evaluation of Oocyte Quality in Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Antagonist Protocol Followed by Frozen Embryo Transfer

Evaluation of Oocyte Quality in Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Antagonist Protocol Followed by Frozen Embryo Transfer

by admin

Department of Reproductive Medicine, ARC International Fertility and Research Centre, Egmore, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence Dr. C. Oviya, MBBS, MS (O&G), Department of Reproductive Medicine, ARC International Fertility and Research Centre, Egmore, Chennai-600003, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
Received: 23 May 2022; Revised:03 July 2022; Accepted: 28 August 2022..
Copyright ©2022 Phcog.Net
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Published in: J Young Pharm 2022; 14(4): 412;Published online: October 2022 DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2022.14.83

ABSTRACT

Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a highly prevalent hormonal disorder noted among 5-8 percent of women in the age group of 15-40 years. Genetics, diet and lifestyle play a crucial role in modulating PCOS by managing a healthy weight and abdominal circumference. In treatment procedure GnRH antagonist protocol was used as a preferred mode of stimulation to reduce the side effects of GnRH agonist procedure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the oocyte quality under controlled ovarian stimulation along with antagonist regimen, ensued by the transfer of frozen embryos. Materials and Methods: This research is retrospective and analytical. The data was analysed utilizing 100 PCOS and 100 non PCOS subjects. From the retrieved data, base line characteristics, quality of oocyte, M2 conversion rate, blastocyst formation rate, clinical viable pregnancy rate was noted. Antagonist protocol followed by frozen embryo transfer was assessed between PCOS and Non-PCOS women. Results: The M2 conversion rate was significantly higher in the Non PCOS group while the need for double antag was significantly more in the PCOS group. No variation was observed in the rate of fertilization, cleavage rate, blastocyst conversion rate and frozen embryo rate between PCOS and non PCOS group. Conclusion: Antagonist protocol would be a better protocol option for PCOS women helping in reducing the risk of OHSS without compromising on quality of embryo, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate.

Keywords: PCOS, Infertility, OHSS, Antagonist protocol, Oocyte Quaity, Frozen embryo Transfer

INTRODUCTION

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is a commonly prevalent hormonal disorder observed in 5-8 % women in the age group of 15-45 years. PCOS has been linked to chronic anovulatory cycles.1 At every level of the reproductive system, several factors have been identified as contributing to the pathophysiology of anovulation in PCOS. Diet, lifestyle, and genetics all have a significant impact on PCOS. There is a higher likelihood of having PCOS if a close family member already has the condition.2 When exposed to blood sugar levels, the fats and protein from food can become advanced glycation end products. When exposed to blood sugar, the diet can produce advanced glycation end products. Foods that are low on the glycemic index such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains and milk contain relatively few advanced glycations end products, even after cooking all of which modulate PCOS.3 Obesity is known to accentuate the PCOS problem. Consequently, maintaining a healthy weight, in particular regulating the circumference of abdomen, is vital for PCOS therapy.4 PCOS patients as well as patients with infertility problems choose assisted reproductive techniques like controlled ovarian stimulation and frozen embryo transfer. Following controlled ovarian stimulation by follic lestimulating hormone, the exposure of ovaries to human chorionic gonadotropin or luteinizing hormone in many instances lead to Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS).5 There are no specific tests and no specific symptoms for OHSS. Meta-analysis data indicated a lower risk of OHSS in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles using Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist compared to cycles using GnRH agonist as part of the treatment protocol.6 PCOS is one of the major risk factors for development of OHSS and thus this sub-group of women can be targeted for mono follicular ovulation. GnRH agonist protocol is linked with enhanced risk of OHSS in PCOS patients, therefore GnRH Antagonist protocol is used as a preferred mode of stimulation.7 Studies from multiple centres have revealed that women who have frozen embryo transfers experience much more live births than those who receive fresh embryo transfers.8 Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the quality of oocyte, M2 conversion rates, blastocyst formation rates, clinical viable pregnancy rates in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle and Antagonist protocol followed by frozen embryo transfer in PCOS and non-PCOS women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

This retrospective analytical study reviewed the results of 209 patients who had undergone ICSI treatment from January 2020 – December 2021 in ARC branches (Avadi, Perambur, Egmore, Perungudi and Saveetha). As this was a retrospective study, patient’s participation in the analysis was not required. After getting the IEC approval of ARC International research and fertility center, Chennai, patient data collection was initiated.

The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with PCOS as per the Criteria of Rotterdam9 Non-PCOS women with AFC > 8 having tubal factor or male factor infertility served as controls. The women with history of continuous inflammation of the reproductive system like chronic endometriosis, endometritis, adenomyosis, presence of fluid, other ovarian pathology / surgery, structural deformity, low ovarian reserve, recurrent implantation failure, husband age >45 years were excluded from the study. 200 patient’s data fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 100 were allocated to the PCOS and non PCOS group individually.

Study Procedure

The patient’s basic information, like maternal age, height, body mass index (BMI), weight, period of infertility, causes of infertility, preconditions, and prior IVF attempts and pregnancies, as well as number of oocytes retrieved, rate of M2 conversion, and fertilisation rate, were collected from the patient’s database file after receiving ethical committee approval for the study. Patients’ data was categorized based on Rotterdam criteria as PCOS as study participants (n=100) and Non-PCOS women with AFC >8 with tubal factor or male factor infertility as control participants (n=100). All the participants had undergone controlled ovarian stimulation with antagonist protocol triggered by GnRH, followed by oocyte retrieval and oocyte insemination. Oocyte quality and embryo grading was noted followed by freeze all strategy after which frozen embryo transfer was done. Oocyte retrieval was done 35 hrs after the trigger and the count of oocytes retrieved, count of M2, blastocyst formation rates were analyzed using vaginal ultrasound guidance under light anaesthesia. Frozen embryo transfer was done. The value of beta Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) on day 15 and the evidence of heart rate in first scan was noticed.

Ovarian stimulation with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone was carried out on the second or third day of the menstrual cycle. According to the ovarian response doses were altered. During the ovarian stimulation the goal was to form a minimum of 3 mature follicles having a diameter of 17 mm or more. Once this was achieved, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and other medications were discontinued, and a single injection of HCG was given to mature the eggs to allow fertilization. HCG is administered 3 hr before the scheduled egg retrieval such to allow adequate maturation of eggs. HCG was used for triggering of ovulation following Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). In a single dose of 5000 -10000IU, Urinary HCG has proved an excellent substitute for the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge.10

The timing of the egg retrieval was based on the initiation of endogenous LH surge. Approximately 4-6 h after follicular aspiration by ICSI, oocytes were inseminated depending on the quality of the sperm. Embryo scoring was done based on the morphologic criteria. After 3 to 6 days of culture, high quality embryos were taken for freezing process and stored. The frozen embryo transfer was done after the endometrial thickness reaching >7mm and the supplement of progesterone was started.1113

Follow up was done consequently and HCG level was done on 15th day and heart rate was monitored in the first scan.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were presented with frequency and proportion whereas continuous variables were presented with mean and standard deviation. The statistical significance of the cross tabulation between categorical variables was examined using the chi square test. Independent t-test was used to compare continuous variables between two groups. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using RStudio version 1.2.1093.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the PCOS(n=100) and non-PCOS (n=100) was analysed. There were nil significant differences found in the age, husband age, history of previous pregnancy, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus. Whereas significantly enhanced weight and BMI was observed in the PCOS compared to the non-PCOS group (Table 1).

The type and period of infertility showed no variation when PCOS was compared with non-PCOS women (Table 2). The rate of fertilization and cleavage, blastocyst conversion rate, frozen embryo rate in PCOS was like the non-PCOS subjects. Whereas significantly increased M2 conversion rate was noted in the non-PCOS subjects compared to PCOS (Table 3). The clinical pregnancy and clinical viable rate of pregnancy for the PCOS and Non-PCOS groups were found to be similar (Table 2). The need for two or more antag injection was more in the PCOS when compared to non PCO group (Table 2). The embryo quality was assessed in both the PCOS and Non-PCOS group. Majority of the embryos was found to be of good quality in both PCOS (86%) and non-PCOS (89%) while14% and 11% were of average quality in PCOS and Non PCOS group respectively. 14% of the embryos were found to be of average quality with 86% good quality in PCOS and 11% average quality with 89% good quality in non PCOS.

Baseline characteristics PCOS (n=100) Non-PCOS (n=100) P-value
Age (Mean ± SD) 28.73±3.71 28.34±3.68 0.456
Weight (Mean ± SD) 68.41±9.63 65.57±9.91 0.041
BMI (Mean ± SD) 28.89±4.96 27.07±4.31 0.006
Husband age (Mean ± SD) 33.02±4.42 33.06±4.48 0.949
Previous pregnancies Yes 14(14.0%) 9(9.0%) 0.268
No 86(86.0%) 91(91.0%)
Hypothyroidism Yes 29(29.0%) 19(19.0%) 0.098
No 71(71.0%) 81(81.0%)
Diabetes Mellitus Yes 3(3.0%) 1(1.0%) 0.614
No 97(97.0%) 99(99.0%)
Table 1.
Comparison of baseline characteristics between PCOS and non-PCOS group
Variables PCOS (n=100) Non-PCOS (n=100) P-value
Infertility variables
Type of infertility Primary 86(86.0%) 90(90.0%) 0.384
Secondary 14(14.0%) 10(10.0%)
Period of infertility <5 years 48(48.0%) 49(49.0%) 0.411
5 to 10 years 38(38.0%) 31(31.0%)
>10 years 14(14.0%) 20(20.0%)
Clinical Pregnancy
Clinical Pregnancy Yes 56(56.0%) 53(53.0%) 0.670
No 44(44.0%) 47(47.0%)
Clinical viable pregnancy Yes 47(47.0%) 49(49.0%) 0.777
No 53(53.0%) 51(51.0%)
Antag Injection
Need for double antag Yes 40(40.0%) 2(2.0%) <0.001*
No 60(60.0%) 98(98.0%)
Antag injection <5 25(25.0%) 86(86.0%) <0.001*
>5 75(75.0%) 14(14.0%)
*.
Comparison between PCOS and non-PCOS group
Variables PCOS (n=100) Non-PCOS (n=100) P-value
M2 conversion rate in % (Mean ± SD) 62.74±17.24 72.01±17.61 <0.001
Fertilization rate in % (Mean ± SD) 83.46±15.86 84.02±13.99 0.791
Cleavage rate in % (Mean ± SD) 74.29±20.14 70.46±19.43 0.173
Blastocyst conversion rate in % (Mean ± SD) 49.51±19.36 51.47±17.15 0.449
Frozen embryo rate in % (Mean ± SD) 39.37±16.26 43.30±15.95 0.086
Table 3.
Comparison of M2 conversion rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, blastocyst conversion rate and frozen embryo rate between PCOS and non-PCOS grou

DISCUSSION

The pathophysiology of PCOS is multifactorial involving endocrine, metabolic, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Compared to normal ovulating women PCOS women have enhanced levels of serum LH, reduced or normal FSH and elevated LH to FSH ratios.

In the current study PCOS patients were categorized as cases while normal responders with male infertility or tubal factor associated infertility were categorized as controls. While enhanced weight and BMI was observed in the PCOS group compared to the non PCOS group, no difference was noted in the mean age and in proportion of hypothyroidism and DM in both groups. A positive correlation was observed between body mass index and the total dose needed in PCOS group which was found to be high. Our observation was in agreement with prior studies that showed that in more than fifty percentages of PCOS women were associated with higher BMI than average population.14 Oocyte maturation and ovarian steroidogenesis was impaired in obese women which was already altered in PCOS women. Obesity also increases insulin level and cause changes in adipokines level which in turn impact oocyte developmental competence. Thus, obesity is linked to reduction in the quality of oocyte q and reduced fertilization rates which could account for the changes observed.15

There was no risk of OHSS observed in PCOS as well as non PCOS group. Meta-analysis findings demonstrated a lower risk of OHSS in in-vitro fertilization cycles using GnRH antagonist while compared to cycles using gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist as part of the treatment protocol for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation. Thus, when compared to agonist protocol, GnRH antagonist trigger protocol was effective in preventing OHSS.16 The differential action of GnRH antagonist at both pituitary and ovarian receptors could be responsible for reduced risk of OHSS.17

The total quantity of oocytes retrieved was more in the PCOS group. Similar observation was made by Dor et al. who noted a profound increase in oocytes retrieved per cycle in PCOS when compared with tubal factor infertility group, but lower fertilization rates were noted in their study unlike ours where no difference in fertilization rate was observed among the two groups. Additionally, no variation was observed between the PCOS and non-PCOS groups in terms of fertilization rate, blastocyst formation rate, or number of useable embryos. Also, no variations were noted in the clinical viable pregnancy rate among PCOS and non PCOS group. These findings were reflected by Roshan et al. who showed that the quality of oocytes, the quantity and quality of embryos showed no significant variation among PCOS and non PCOS patients. The antagonist protocol was known to help in the reduction of OHSS incidence rates without compromising pregnancy outcomes.18 Fernandez et al. showed that oocyte quantity obtained from PCOS women were higher, but no change was observed in the number of high-quality oocytes obtained.19 According to Nikbakht et al. finding’s there was a statistically significant difference in the quantity of oocytes extracted, but our study’s results demonstrate that there was no significant difference in the quantity and quality of embryos.20

In a case control, retrospective study while comparing PCOS and Non PCOS women, though the quantity of oocytes in PCOS patients were significantly more, no changes were noted in the quality of oocytes.20 In a prospective cohort study done among PCOS patients in comparison with controls with male factor infertility, no difference was noted in the oocyte quality, embryo, and pregnancy rates between PCOS patients and control subjects.21 In comparison with the non-PCOS group the M2 conversion rate was reduced in the PCOS group even though the oocyte retrieval was higher with no change in viable pregnancy. Esinler et al. showed that number of good grade embryos were increased in PCOS group in comparison to the control.22

The capacity of an oocyte to successfully go through meiosis, fertilise, and form an embryo along with fruitful pregnancy is known as oocyte competence. According to recent research, the follicular microenvironment’s dysfunction, and a different synchronisation among the cumulus cells of the growing follicle and the oocyte may both affect oocyte competence.23,24 In various retrospective studies it has been found that a similar rate of oocytes in the metaphase stage was observed in the PCOS and control group while the number of embryos were higher in PCOS group. The high quality of embryo was maintained in both the groups.22,25,26 A meta-analysis by Heijnen et al. states the same results.27 The salient findings between PCOS and Non-PCOS Group after OHSS was increase in egg production and decreased M2 conversion. All other factors like blastocyst formation, pregnancy etc were the same between PCOS and Non-PCOS group. In PCOS patients as there is a follicular growth disturbance with modification in follicular microenvironment, detrimental effects on oocyte quality may be observed. The oocyte competency and pregnancy rates appear to be compromised by the confluence of a metabolic condition and PCOM. To enable a better understanding of the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the oocyte competence according to each phenotype of PCOS, prospective studies with internationally accepted diagnostic criteria are required.

CONCLUSION

In our study we found that oocytes retrieved from PCOS group was significantly more in number when compared to non-PCOS group as it was said in previous studies but M2 conversion rate is almost same in both groups. Fertilisation rate, clevage rate, blastocyst conversion rate was same in both groups. The percentage of top-quality embryos also remained the same. However, because of a greater number of oocyte retrieval PCOS patient had more set of backup embryos when compared to non PCOS group. Regarding clinical pregnancy rate it was same in both groups. As observed in previous studies the total dosage needed during the period of stimulation is higher in obese patients compared to patients with normal BMI. In our study compared to controls PCOS patients are found to have high BMI. It can be concluded that antagonist protocol would be the better protocol for PCOS women in reducing the risk of OHSS without compromising embryo quality or fertilisation rate or clinical pregnancy rate.

Cite this article

Oviya C, Mahalakshmi S, Devi S, Senthil P. Evaluation of Oocyte Quality in PCOS Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Antagonist Protocol Followed by Frozen Embryo Transfer. J Young Pharm. 2022;14(4):412-5.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO, et al. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2745-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  2. Azziz R, Kashar-Miller MD. Family history as a risk factor for the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2000;13(Suppl 5):1303-6. [PubMed] | [Google Scholar]
  3. Uribarri J, Cai W, Pyzik R. Suppression of native defense mechanisms, SIRT1 and PPARγ, by dietary glycoxidants precedes disease in adult humans; relevance to lifestyle-engendered chronic diseases. Amino Acids. 2014;46(2):301-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  4. Patel S. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), an inflammatory, systemic, lifestyle endocrinopathy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;182:27-36. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar P, Sait SF, Sharma A, Kumar M. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(2):70-5. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M. Gonadotrophin- releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3(3):CD001750 Google Scholar [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  7. Forman RG, Frydman R, Egan D, Ross C, Barlow DH. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone for fertilization: A European series and a proposal for prevention. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(3):502-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523-33. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  9. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41-7. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  10. Nakano R, Mizuno T, Kotsuji F. Triggering of ovulation after infusion of synthetic lutenizing hormone releasing factor (LRF). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1973;52(3):2659-72. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  11. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B. Implantation in assisted reproduction: a look at endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(5):530-8. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen–thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2316-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen R, Chen S, Liu M, He H, Xu H, Liu H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS overweight/obese patients after controlled ovarian stimulation with the GnRH antagonist protocol and frozen embryo transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):36 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  14. Cano F, García-Velasco JA, Millet A, Remohí J, Simón C, Pellicer A, et al. Oocyte quality in polycystic ovaries revisited: Identification of a particular subgroup of women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(5):254-61. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  15. Purcell SH, Moley KH. The impact of obesity on egg quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(6):517-24. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  16. De Ziegler DD, Streuli I, Gayet V, Frydman N, Bajouh O, Chapron C, et al. Retrieving oocytes from small non-stimulated follicles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): maturation (IVM) is not indicated in the new GnRH antagonist era. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):290-3. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  17. Fábregues F, Balasch J, Ginès P, Manau D, Jiménez W, Arroyo V, et al. Ascites and liver test abnormalities during severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(4):994-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  18. Copperman AB, Benadiva C. Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: A review of the literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:20 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernandez H. Oocyte and embryo quality in polycystic ovary syndrome. Array. Array;Array(11):Array-Array. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  20. Nikbakht R, Mohammadjafari R, Rajabalipour M, Moghadam MT. Evaluation of oocyte quality in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing ART cycles. Fertil Res Pract. 2021;7(1):2 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  21. Afiat M, Khadem N, Nayeri E, Jalali R, Akhlaghi S, Akhgari E, et al. Comparison of oocyte and embryo quality in women with polycys tic ovary syndrome and the control group candidate for fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2021;9(3):1-7. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  22. Esinler I, Bayar U, Bozdag G, Yarali H. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome or isolated polycystic ovaries. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):932-7. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  23. Kenigsberg S, Bentov Y, Chalifa-Caspi V, Potashnik G, Ofir R, Birk OS, et al. Gene expression microarray profiles of cumulus cells in lean and overweight-obese polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(2):89-103. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  24. Kwon H, Choi DH, Bae JH, Kim JH, Kim YS. mRNA expression pattern of insulin-like growth factor components of granulosa cells and cumulus cells in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome according to oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2417-20. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  25. Ludwig M, Finas DF, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, Ortmann O. Oocyte quality and treatment outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(2):354-8. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  26. Sahu B, Ozturk O, Ranierri M, Serhal P. Comparison of oocyte quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in women with isolated polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovarian syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277(3):239-44. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  27. Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Laven JS, Macklon NS, Fauser BC, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(1):13-21. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]