Home Full text Potential Food Interactions of Antibiotics and Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Database Research Study

Potential Food Interactions of Antibiotics and Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Database Research Study

by admin

1Research Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur (JNTUA), Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

2Department of Pharmacy Practice, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (RIPER) Autonomous, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence Dr. Pradeep Battula, Research Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur, Ananthapuramu-515002, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
Received: 25 April 2022; Revised: 29 June 2022; Accepted: 23 August 2022.
Copyright ©2022 Phcog.Net
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Published in: J Young Pharm 2022; 14(4): 420;Published online: October 2022 DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2022.14.85

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The present study describes about the Antibiotic-Food Interactions (AFI) and development of Antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Materials and Methods: The Micromedex medication database was used to find and identify potential antibiotic interactions. Micromedex is a trustworthy drug database that used to research medications, interactions, diseases, and dose estimations. Results: As a result, a total of 68 AFIs were obtained, including major, moderate, and Minor AFIs among them. AMR-causing interactions were found in 34 of the 68 AFIs (50%). Only 3 (4.41%) of these 34 (50%) interactions were minor, whereas the remaining 31 (45.58%) were moderate. Only moderate and minor interactions were expected to induce AMR evolution; no major interactions were found to be unrelated to AMR development. Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance is an important public health concern throughout the world. A pharmacist is a healthcare expert who analyzes a prescription for possible medication interactions and eliminates them in order to improve the patient’s prognosis.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Drug-food interactions, Antibiotics, Clinical pharmacist

INTRODUCTION

Drugs taken at the same time can interact and affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the medicine. Drug-Food Interactions (DFIs) have the same clinical significance as Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs). When a drug is taken with food, the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and pharmacological impact of the medication are all affected. DFIs can result in therapeutic failure, major life-threatening side effects, or ADRs, and a patient’s hospital stay being extended. The DFI may influence the drug’s effectiveness and concentration available to be reduced or increased in some cases. It can result in treatment failure and drug toxicity.13

The antibiotics are the focus of this database study. Antibiotics, also known as antimicrobial medications, are secondary metabolites produced by bacteria, and synthetic or semi-synthesized compounds can suppress bacterial growth and survival, allowing the immune system the upper hand. As a reason, these medications can be used to treat infectious diseases.4,5 As a consequence, when antibiotics are used concurrently, there is a risk of developing Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). It’s possible that the reason for prescription numerous antibiotics. Actually, these medications areto improve therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes. Antibiotic interactions, on the other side, can be both synergistic and antagonistic, leading to the development of AMR.6,7 In the same way, AMR might arise as a result of Antibiotic-Food Interactions (AFIs). The AFIs can cause changes in the antibiotic’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which can lead to the development of AMR. The objective of this study is to predict the AMR through the AFIs by using the Micromedex database, the results are analyzed and documented for the future use to council the patients about the possibilities of AMR with food.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IBM Micromedex 20.0 database was used to identify the AFIs. Micromedex is an evidence-based drug information database that contains information on drugs, drug interactions, patient care comments, IV compatibility, dose calculations, drug comparisons, and disease information.

Antibiotics Search Strategy

A Micromedex database keyword search revealed the entire number of antibiotics available in databases. When you type in the name of an antibiotic in a keyword search, we willget about 200 results. Some antibiotics in the above list were not found in the Micromedex database which includessulfadoxine, sulfamethopyrazine, sulfasalazine, mafenide, co-trimoxazole, pefloxacin, prulifloxacin, ceftazolin, ceftamet pivoxil, cefpirome, ceftobiprole, faropenem, sisomicin, framycetin, tedizolid, fusidic acid, colistin, methenamine, phenazopyridine, and isoniazid.

Procedure for Drug Interactions

The technique for getting medication interactions for the available antibiotics in the database, as well as the findings of interactions, is depicted in Figure 1. Select the drug interaction option after logging into the database, and then enter the 200 antibiotic drugs one by one using the database’s choices. By giving the name of the antibiotic and transferring it into the drug to check, you can find the necessary antibiotic in the matching antibiotic medications. Once entered all of the antibiotics, click the submit button. It lists all of the antibiotic interactions and allows the user to switch to alternative interactions options as needed (drug, food, ethanol, lab, pregnancy, and lactation).

Figure 1.
The procedure for determining DFIs and their outcomes.

Drug Interaction Analysis

After receiving all the antibiotic medication interactions, the information was double-checked to see if there were any antibiotics that had been missed. During the drug’s entry into the system, no antibiotics were missed, according to the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 68 AFIs were obtained as a result, in those AFIs some was major, moderate and minor. Among the 68 AFIs 34 (50%) were identified as AMR causing interactions. In these 34 (50%) interactions, only 3 (4.41%) were minor interactions and the remaining 31 (45.58%) were as moderate interactions. There were no major interactions, which were not relating to AMR development; only moderate and minor interactions were predicted as to cause the AMR evolution. The all predicted AFIs were displayed in the Table 1. As a result of the concomitant use of antibiotics with food or dairy products, the concentration of antibiotics was decreased/ altered, and the antibiotic’s efficiency was reduced. Penicillins, macrolides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclins were the most involvedantibiotics in AFIs. The prediction of AMR was done based on the spectrum of activity antibiotics. The AMR prediction information was given the Table 2.

S. No Drug involved in drug-food interaction Severity Summary Documentation
Drug Food
1 Ampicillin Food Moderate Concurrent use of ampicillin and food may results in decreased ampicillin concentration Good
2 Ampicillin sodium Decreased concentration Good
3 Ampicillin sodium + Sulbactam sodium Decreased concentration Good
4 Benzoyl peroxide + erythromycin Altered concentrations. Good
5 Cefaclor Decreased concentration Good
6 Enoxacin Decreased effectiveness Fair
7 Erythromycin Altered concentrations Good
8 Erythromycin estolate Altered concentrations Good
9 Erythromycin ethylsuccinate Altered concentrations Good
10 Erythromycin ethylsuccinate + sulfisoxazole acetyl Altered erythromycin concentrations Good
11 Erythromycin gluceptate Altered concentrations Good
12 Erythromycin lactobionate Altered concentrations Good
13 Erythromycin stearate Altered concentrations Good
14 Lincomycin hydrochloride Decreased exposure Good
15 Demeclocycline hydrochloride Minor Decreased levels Good
16 Norfloxacin Reduced effectiveness Fair
17 Nafcillin sodium Decreased concentrations Fair
18 Penicillin G benzathine Moderate Decreased peak concentrations Good
19 Penicillin G procaine Decreased peak concentrations Good
20 Penicillin G potassium Decreased peak concentrations Good
21 Penicillin G potassium/sodium chloride Decreased peak concentrations Good
22 Penicillin G sodium Decreased peak concentrations Good
23 Oxacillin sodium Decreased concentration Fair
24 Loracarbef Prolonged time to peak concentration Good
25 Ciprofloxacin Dairy Foods Decreased concentrations Good
26 Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride Decreased concentrations Good
27 Ciprofloxacin lactate Decreased concentrations Good
28 Democlocycline hydrochloride Decreased absorption and efficacy Fair
29 Gemifloxacin mesylate Decreased concentrations Fair
30 Minocycline hydrochloride Decreased concentrations Good
31 Norfloxacin Reduced mean peak plasma concentration. Good
32 Oxytetracycline hydrochloride Decreased effectiveness Good
33 Oxytetracycline hydrochloride+polymyxin B sulfate Decreased effectiveness Good
34 Tetracycline hydrochloride Decreased concentrations. Good
Table 1.
Interactions between antibiotics and food indicating a risk of antimicrobial resistance
Family/Antibiotic Risk of resistant microorganism
Gram Positive Gram Negative
Ampicillin Listeria monocytogenes Escherichia coliProteus species Salmonella typhiShigellaHaemophilus influenzaeHelicobacter pyloriPseudomonas aeruginosaKlebsiella
Cefaclor Streptococcus pneumonia
Streptococcus pyogenes
Haemophilus influenzaeEscherichia coliM catarrhalisProteus speciesKlebsiella
Loracarbef Marketing end on 2006
Enoxacin Staphylococcus epidermis Neisseria gonorrhoeaeEscherichia coliKlebsiellaProteus speciesPseudomonas aeruginosa
Erythromycin Streptococcus pyogenesStreptococcus pneumoniaClostridium perfringensCorynebacterium -diphtheriaeListeria monocytogenes Neisseria gonorrhoeaeMycoplasmaLegionella pneumophilaChlamydia trachomatisBordetella pertusis
Lincomycin Penicillin resistant staphylococci Bacteroides fragilis
Tetracyclines:e.g: DemeclocyclineMinocyclineOxytetracyclineTetracycline Bacillus anthracis Rickettsiae speciesChlamydiae speciesBrucella abortusMycoplasmaLeptospira
Semisynthetic penicillins:e.g: Nafcillin Oxacillin Staphylococci species
Penicillin G Streptococcus species,
Bacillus anthracis
Corynebacterium diphtheriae,
Neisseria gonorrhoeaeNeisseria meningitidisTreponema speciesLeptospira
Fluoroquinolones:e.g: CiprofloxacinGemifloxacinNorfloxacin Bacillus anthracis
Staphylococcus aureus
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
Streptococcus species
Enterococcus species
Mycobacterium avium
Escherichia coliKlebsiellaProteus speciesSalmonella typhiShigellaHaemophilus influenzaePseudomonas aeruginosaLegionella pneumophilaH. ducreyiVibrio choleraNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNeisseria meningitidisMycoplasma
Table 2.
Antibiotics and the risk of antimicrobial resistance

DISCUSSION

Antibiotics proved effective in treating bacterial infections. Unfortunately, antibiotics have been misused for the past 50 years, and experts have recommended combination therapy to improve patient outcomes.8

Oral administration of medications is the most commonly prescribed dosage form by clinicians, and these dosage forms may be contributing to the emergence of AMR. When an antibiotic is taken with food, it causes an interaction that affects the patient’s Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) and therapeutic action.13

Finally, the efficiency of antibiotics will be reduced, and their concentration will be reduced. This was the rationale for predicting the AMR. That information was given in Table 1. Penicillins, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and tetracyclines were the most commonly involved classes in AFIs. The antibiotic efficacy and peak concentration of antibiotics were both reduced in all AFIs. In similar,and the repeated use of these drugs with foods surely can cause AMR development. AFIs can contribute to the emergence of AMR in patients and treatment failure as a result of these processes predicting that. The spectrum of activity of antibiotics was used to predict resistant microbes. The spectrum, which were illustrates how antibiotics affect microorganisms. The antibiotic either may beNarrow-spectrum, broad-spectrum, or extended-spectrum if involved in AFIs chances to get AMR. Even while antibiotics are effective at killing or inhibiting the growth of bacteria, misuse or improper use can lead to AMR.9-11

In Indian marketing, enoxacin was banned drug. Thus enoxacin was not available in the market. Although the risk of AMR was estimated, antibiotic and food interaction was available in the database. Loracarbef was a carbacephem antibiotic sometimes grouped together with the second-generation cephalosporin antibiotics and that was banned in the year 2006. As a reason, there was no information provided about loracarbef.12-13

To combat AMR, the consumer or patient required education and awareness. Health professionals will play a vital role in solving this important global health issue. The pharmacist must educate and counsel patients on the use of antibiotics, and the patient will be free of such outcomes and other consequences as a result. Because the pharmacist is a healthcare practitioner, they must aware of possible and actual DDIs as well as drug-food interactions. Before discharging a patient, pharmacists analyze the prescription and examine the drug chart for any drug-related issues, DDIs, and AFIs. Not only theassessment ofthe prescription, but it’s also important to educate and counsel the patient about medications, diseases, and lifestyle changes. Theclinical pharmacy is a professional service that is widely available in all nations and will be beneficial in this regard. To ensure the rational use of drugs, clinical pharmacists will attend to ward rounds and review every prescription for drug, dose, duration, frequency, and dosage forms. Thus, the clinical pharmacist will act as a link between the patient and the physician, leading to improved pharmaceutical care for the patient.3,14-15

One of the advantages of this database research is the ability to predict AMR using antibiotics and interactions. The databases offered documentation for interactions, but the risk must be further assessed using AMR databases, which validates AMR by microorganisms against antibiotics; this is the study limitation. This study suggests that if the AMR database is employed in this study, it will be able to confirm antimicrobial resistance predictions.

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health concern around the world. The pharmacist is a healthcare expert who examines a prescription for possible medication interactions and eliminates them in order to improve the patient’s prognosis.

Cite this article

Battula P, Kumar BP. Potential Food Interactions of Antibiotics and Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Database Research Study. J Young Pharm. 2022;14(4):420-4.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koziolek M, Alcaro S, Augustijns P, Basit AW, Grimm M, Hens B, et al. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions – A perspective from the UNGAP group. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;134:31-59. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  2. Petric Z, Žuntar I, Putnik P, Bursac Kovacevic D. Food–drug interactions with fruit juices. Foods. 2020;10(1):33 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  3. Zawiah M, Yousef AM, Khan AH, Al-Ashwal FY, Matar A, ALKhawaldeh B, Abduljabbar R, Abdo Ahmed AA, et al. Food-drug interactions: knowledge among pharmacists in Jordan. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234779 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben Y, Fu C, Hu M, Liu L, Wong MH, Zheng C, et al. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: a review. Environ Res. 2019;169:483-93. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  5. Michel JB, Yeh PJ, Chait R, Moellering RC, Kishony R. Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]