Journal of Young Pharmacists logo
Article

Intravenous Antibiotic: Potential Alternative for Restricted Oral Route during Removal of Third Molar

1★, 2★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Prosthodontics, Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Jalan Bedong-Semeling, 08100, Bedong, Kedah Darul Aman, MALAYSIA.
  2. 2Reception & Primary Care Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Jalan Bedong-Semeling, 08100, Bedong, Kedah Darul Aman, MALAYSIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Chidambaram Ramasamy

Department of Prosthodontics, Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Jalan Bedong-Semeling, 08100, Bedong, Kedah Darul Aman, MALAYSIA.

dr.ramasamyc@gmail.com

Volume 8, Issue 1 · pp. 59 · 2015 · DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2016.1.14

ABSTRACT

Third molar popularly called as wisdom tooth has been a prime concern for oral and maxillofacial surgeons owing to its associated problems. The failure to erupt in oral cavity, because of mechanical obstruction leads to impaction (fusion) of tooth with jaw bone. Conservative care of the impacted tooth is not feasible, considering its unfavourable anatomy. Thus surgical removal of tooth remains the gold standard for impacted teeth. Furthermore, a host of factors such as occurrence of pericoronitis (localised infection surrounding wisdom tooth), secondary caries and debris lodgement complicate the scenario thereby requiring prompt service. Irrespective of the strict protocols undertaken, post-operative complications (alveolar osteitis and wound infection) have been reported in candidates.1 In order to control the wound infection, oral clinicians have been pushed to administer antibiotic via oral or intravenous route. Literature contains ample evidence on the former mode of delivery with an unclear summary.1 Meanwhile, neither a controversy prevails nor do valid documents exist on intravenous antibiotics. Less has been discussed on the impact of IV antibiotics in dental tributaries. This could be the possible reason for being unpopular among oral physicians. Current letter addresses the indications of IV antibiotics during third molar surgery to restore its unsupported preference.

KEYWORDS

Open in new tab

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

    Cite this article

    SELECT FORMAT

    Ramasamy, C., & Jawahar, D. (2015). Intravenous Antibiotic: Potential Alternative for Restricted Oral Route during Removal of Third Molar. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 8(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2016.1.14

    Copyright and licence

    © 2015 Author(s)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0