Journal of Young Pharmacists logo
Article

GC-MS Profiling of Caulerpa lentillifera Hot Water Extract and it’s in vitro Effects on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Progression

1, 2, 1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Biomedical Science, Pusat Kanser Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA.
  2. 2Medical Chemistry, Centre for Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Shahrul Bariyah Sahul Hamid

Department of Biomedical Science, Pusat Kanser Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA.

shahrulbariyah@usm.my

Received: 21-05-2026; Revised: 08-06-2026; Accepted: 11-08-2026.

Volume 18, Issue 3 · pp. 702-708 · 2026 · DOI: 10.5530/jyp.20260081

ABSTRACT

Background: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a highly resilient cancer associated with poor survival outcomes. Current treatment with sorafenib inhibits Raf kinases but still encounter resistance mediated by alternative survival pathways. Caulerpa lentillifera (C. lentillifera) has demonstrated anti-cancer properties. Therefore, this study aims to assess its anticancer profile in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells and characterize the metabolomic profile of C. lentillifera hot water extract.Materials and Methods: The experimental methodology was hot water extraction of C. lentifillera and anticancer profiling by cell proliferation, cell migration, and colony formation assays in HEPG2 cells and normal fibroblast L929 cells. Followed by identification of metabolites in hot water extract using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).Results: Comparison of two hot water extraction temperatures indicated that higher yield was obtained at 50ºC than at 100ºC. Cell proliferation assay showed a dose-dependent inhibitory activity with stronger inhibition observed in the extract derived at 100ºC than that at 50ºC. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration at 72 hr was 5 mg/mL for the 100ºC extract and was 8 mg/mL for the 50ºC extract. Subsequent analysis utilized the 100ºC extract to determine changes in cell migration. HepG2 cell migration was reduced after 72 hr of treatment compared with L929 cells. Similar findings were observed in colony formation assay, where the number of colonies was reduced in HepG2 cells relative to L929 cells. GC-MS analysis demonstrated presence of putative constituents cyclohexasilone, cycloheptasiloxane, pentasiloxane and benzoic acid.Conclusion: Taken together, these effects could be attributed to the presence of putative constituents cyclohexasilone, cycloheptasiloxane, and benzoic acid detected in the 100ºC extract. Further validation studies are needed to corroborate these findings for HCC treatment.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Liver cancer is among the top ten cancers and ranked as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) represents as major form of liver cancer (Hwang et al., 2024). According to GLOBOCAN 2022, there were approximately 866,136 new liver cancer cases and 758,725 related deaths (Li et al., 2024). Over 70% of all global HCC cases occur in Asia (predominantly East and Southeast Asia), followed by Africa at roughly 7.8% (Hwang et al., 2024). In Malaysia, liver cancer ranks as the eighth most common cancer. Since 1990, the mortality from liver cancer has increased by 31.5% and HCC is the most common type (Raihan et al., 2018). Approximately 70% of HCC patients experience recurrence within 5 years (Wen et al., 2018). Current therapies include liver transplantation, local ablation, surgical resection or systemic therapy. Surgical resection is classified as curative-intent treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) but still encounter recurrence within 2 years after surgery, while ablation is restricted to tumor size (Hwang et al., 2024). Systemic therapies with multikinase inhibitor have been widely used with sorafenib as first-line targeted therapy for advanced HCC (Guo et al., 2023). Despite its therapeutic efficacy, only approximately 30% of patients derive clinical benefit, and nearly all responders develop acquired drug resistance within six months (Guo et al., 2023; Tang et al., 2020). Therefore, more effective therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Currently, drug discovery is directed toward natural sources due to safety reasons (Gouthamchandra et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2016). Marine algae are a sustainable bioresource known for its valuable bioactive compounds which can be cultivated in controlled environment. Studies show that algae contain numerous health benefits. Green seaweed, notably C. lentillifera, is consumed as salad in Southeast Asia and East Asia. It is rich in phytochemicals, including flavonoids, phenols, and fatty acids (Ismail MM et al., 2023; Nurkolis et al., 2023). Its nutritional profile comprises carbohydrates, fiber, proteins, amino acids, lipids, minerals, vitamins, pigments, and antioxidants (Syakilla N et al., 2022). Previous studies have identified propanoic acid as the most abundant compound in ethanolic macerated extract (Nurkolis et al., 2023), and polysaccharides as the predominant component in water extract (Tesvichian et al., 2024). While, treatment with hexane extract of C. lentillifera in glioblastoma inhibited the proliferation (Tanawoot et al., 2021). Solvent-based extracts of C. lentillifera induced apoptotic cell death in oral cancer KON cells (Manmuan et al., 2025), prostate cancer cells (Wu et al., 2024) and liver cancer cells (Rajasegaran et al., 2024; Sangpairoj et al., 2024). Furthermore, it suppressed the colony formation and migration of these cells. Polysaccharides from C. lentillifera played a similar inhibitory role in both monolayer and spheroid colon cancer models. While C. lentillifera holds therapeutic potential, its hot water extract has not yet been studied in the context of HCC progression. Here, we characterize the metabolomic profile of this extract and assess its anti-cancer potential by measuring HCC cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant sample

Fresh C. lentillifera (Fisheries Research Institute, Malaysia) was washed, oven-dried at 60ºC to a constant weight (Hung OK et al., 2022), ground into a powder, and stored at -20ºC until extraction and analysis.

Hot water extraction of C. lentillifera sample

Following a modified method, C. lentillifera powder (5 g) was extracted in 150 mL of Milli-Q water for 30 min at 50ºC or 100ºC (Azmin et al., 2015). After cooling to 25ºC, the mixtures were filtered through Whatman No. 1 paper. The filtrate was concentrated via rotary evaporation (60ºC, 72 mbar, 30 rpm) and stored at -80ºC, and subsequently lyophilized. The final extract was stored at -20ºC. The percentage yield was calculated using the following formula:

Formula

Complete media and cell culture

HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) and L929 (normal fibroblast) cells were cultured in EMEM and RPMI, respectively. Both media were supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and cultures were maintained at 37ºC with 5% CO₂.

Cytotoxicity analysis using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (5 x 103 cells/well) and cultured overnight. Cells were treated with hot water extract (7.06-113 mg/mL, two-fold dilutions) for 24 or 48 hr, alongside medium-only blanks and untreated negative controls. Cell viability was assessed according to the manufacturer's protocol by measuring absorbance at 570 nm (Koç et al., 2026). The experiments were conducted independently a minimum of three times. The percentage of cell viability was calculated based on the following formula:

Formula

Colony Formation Assay

HepG2 and L929 cells were seeded in triplicate in 6-well plates (1 x 103 cells/well) (Abruscato G et al., 2023). After initial incubation, cells were treated with C. lentillifera extract (5 mg/mL; IC50) and same concentration was used for L929 cells for screening (Tseng et al., 2026), while medium-only wells served as controls. Following a 13-day incubation, cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 70% ethanol, and stained with 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet. Colonies exceeding 50 cells were quantified using a phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, Japan).

Wound healing assay

HepG2 and L929 cells were seeded in 24-well plates (6 × 10⁵ /well) and incubated overnight (Gangwar et al., 2025). After a 2-hr treatment with colcemide (0.1 µg/mL) to inhibit cell division (Zhang et al., 2025), a linear scratch wound was created. Cells were then treated with the 5 mg/mL of C. lentillifera hot water extract, using untreated wells as a control. Wound closure was imaged via an Axiocam Erc 5s rev 2.0 camera (Carl Zeiss) and quantified using ImageJ software according to equation:

Formula

Tθ=area of the wound measured at 0 hour.

T∆h=area of the wound measured at h hours.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC-MS analysis of C. lentillifera methanol extract (0.01 g/mL) was performed using an Agilent 7890A GC coupled to a 5975C MS, equipped with a capillary column (30 m x 250 μm x 0.25 μm). Helium carrier gas (99.99%) was maintained at 1 mL/min, with an injector temperature of 250ºC. The oven program started at 50ºC (3 min), ramped at 10ºC/min to 280ºC, and held at 300ºC for 10 min. MS detection used 70 eV electron ionization, a 0.2 s scan time, and a mass range of 40-600 m/z. Compounds were identified via retention times, peak characteristics, and mass spectra by comparison with the NIST library and GCMSD software (Konappa et al., 2020).

RESULTS

Preparation of hot water extract from C. lentillifera powder

Maceration produced a higher extraction yield at 50ºC than at 100ºC (Table 1). This decrease at the higher temperature is due to rapid water evaporation, which reduces the solvent volume and causes premature saturation. As a result, less water is available to solubilize and extract the target compounds. Consequently, lowering the final yield.

Cytotoxicity of C. lentillifera hot water extract in HepG2

Across all time points (24, 48, and 72 hr), increasing the concentration of the extract led to a progressive decrease in cell viability compared to untreated control cells (Table 2). The cytotoxic effects became significantly more pronounced with longer exposure times. As time progressed from 24 to 48 hr, the concentration required to inhibit 50% of cell growth (IC₅₀) dropped sharply, showcasing heightened toxicity over time. While both extracts showed time-dependent toxicity, the 100ºC extract was notably more effective at longer intervals (48 and 72 hr). Because the 100ºC extract at 72 hr demonstrated the strongest overall inhibitory activity and the lowest cell viability, it was selected as the optimal condition for subsequent analyses.

Effect of C. lentillifera hot water extract on colony formation

Treated HepG2 cells displayed minimal colony development compared to their untreated counterparts, which formed progressively larger and more numerous colonies (Figure 1). In contrast, L929 cells exhibited a substantially lower reduction in colony formation when exposed to the 100ºC extract (Figure 2). This suggests that C. lentillifera demonstrated selective inhibition on HepG2 cells.

Inhibitory effect of C. lentillifera hot water on cell migration

In this assay, treated HepG2 cells demonstrated a marked delay in closure, while untreated control HepG2 cells exhibited progressive wound closure over time (Figure 3). It indicated robust inhibition of cell migration (Figure 3). Nevertheless, wound closure was observed in both the control and treated L929 groups (Figure 4). The extract's inhibitory effect on L929 migration was substantially less pronounced than that observed in HepG2 cells.

Identification of bioactive compounds in C. lentillifera sample

The GC-MS chromatograms revealed three major peaks in both extraction temperatures at retention times of 10.551, 12.750, and 14.713 min. These findings indicated the presence of three major metabolites in hot water extracts. For both the 50 and 100ºC extracts, cyclohexasiloxane and cycloheptasiloxane corresponded to the major peaks with qualities of 91 and 47, respectively (Table 3). In contrast, major constituent of the third peak in the 50ºC extract was pentasiloxane and for the 100ºC extract was benzoic acid derivative.

Table 1: Effect of temperature on percentage of yield from C. lentillifera hot water extracts.
TemperatureYield
50ºC67.8%
100ºC55.9%
Table 2: Dose and time-dependent responses on HepG2 cells.
Extraction temperature24 Hr48 Hr72 Hr
50ºC extract12 mg/mL6 mg/mL8 mg/mL
100ºCextract13 mg/mL5 mg/mL5 mg/mL
Table 3: Metabolites detected by gas chromatography MS analysis.
TemperaturePeak 1Peak 2Peak 3
NameQualityNameQualityNameQuality
50ºCCyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl-91Cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl491,3,5,7,9-Pentaethylbicyclo [5.3.1] pentasiloxane47
100ºCCyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl-91Cycloheptasiloxane, tetradecamethyl-91Benzoic acid, 2,4-bis(trimethy|silyl) oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester47
Figure 1: The colony of HepG2 cells without treatment (control) and treated with C. lentillifera hot water extract (5 mg/mL) after 13 days under a phase-contrast microscope (8x magnification) and crystal violet staining (4x magnification).
Figure 2: The colony of L929 cells without treatment (control) and treated with C. lentillifera hot water extract (5 mg/mL) for 13 days under a phase-contrast microscope (8x magnification) and crystal violet staining (4x magnification).
Figure 3: The wound healing effect of HepG2 cells without treatment (control) and treated with C. lentillifera hot water extract (5 mg/mL) under Olympus phase-contrast microscope (4x magnification).
Figure 4: The wound healing effect of L929 cells without treatment (control) and treated with C. lentillifera hot water extract (5 mg/mL) under Olympus phase-contrast microscope (4x magnification).

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated that the extraction temperature significantly influenced the yield of metabolites obtained from C. lentillifera by hot water maceration. Specifically, extraction at 50ºC resulted in a high yield. In the specific context of C. lentillifera, polysaccharides represent a major class of bioactive water-soluble compounds. Prior study indicated that optimized conditions can yield substantial polysaccharide content up to ~25% of dry weight, further illustrating that C. lentillifera constituents respond differently to maceration temperature (Chaiklahan et al., 2020).

The C. lentillifera hot water extracts prepared at 50 and 100ºC exhibited time- and concentration-dependent cytotoxic effects against HepG2 liver cancer cells. HepG2 cells exposed to increasing concentrations of the extracts for 24, 48, and 72 hr showed a progressive decrease in viability. These findings indicate that the cytotoxic effect was influenced by treatment duration and extraction temperature, with the 100ºC extract demonstrating greater potency at later time points. Previously, aqueous extracts of C. racemosa and Ulva lactuca were able to reduce viability in HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Choudhary et al., 2021). The apparent difference in cytotoxicity between the two maceration temperatures suggests that it influences the profile of metabolites. Higher extraction temperatures may enhance the release and solubility of certain phytochemicals or secondary metabolites, resulting in more effective inhibition of HepG2 proliferation.

The colony formation assay determines whether cells retain the ability to undergo unlimited division and form colonies, which is critical in assessing the potential of an anticancer agent to prevent metastasis (Brix et al., 2021). In this study, treatment of HepG2 liver cancer cells with 5 mg/mL C. lentillifera hot water extract prepared at 100ºC resulted in a marked reduction in colony formation than untreated HepG2 cells over the incubation period. Untreated HepG2 cells exhibited progressive colony growth with a higher number of colonies per well, indicating preserved clonogenic survival. In contrast, treated HepG2 cells formed markedly fewer or no visible colonies, demonstrating a strong inhibitory effect. This suppression of the colony-forming ability suggests that the extract effectively impaired the reproductive integrity of HepG2 cells rather than merely inducing transient cytotoxic effects. Another study demonstrated that seaweed-derived polysaccharides significantly reduced colony formation in HepG2 cells, indicating long-term growth suppression (Kumarasinghe et al., 2025). Likewise, extract from C. racemosa significantly inhibited colony formation in cancer cell lines (Permatasari et al., 2022b). L929 cells showed only minimal reduction, indicating that normal cells retained greater proliferative capacity under the same treatment conditions. Such selectivity is a desirable characteristic in anticancer agents, as it indicates reduced toxicity toward normal tissues.

In the present study, the wound healing assay demonstrated that C. lentillifera hot water extracts inhibited migration of HepG2, while L929 normal fibroblast cells were able to migrate. The untreated HepG2 control cells exhibited progressive wound closure over time, reflecting active migratory capacity. In contrast, HepG2 cells treated with C. lentillifera hot water extract had a pronounced delay in wound closure. The reduced migration is unlikely to be solely due to cytotoxicity, as the assay was conducted under conditions that prevented proliferation. However, further analysis is required to confirm its anti-metastatic features. A study demonstrated that extracts of C. racemosa significantly inhibited migration as evidenced by delayed wound closure in treated cells (Permatasari et al., 2022a). Similarly, seaweed-derived bioactive compounds reduced migration of HepG2 cells in wound healing assays through modulation of matrix metalloproteinases and epithelial-mesenchymal transition -related proteins (Cho et al., 2022). The selective anti-migratory effect observed in this study, where HepG2 cells were more strongly inhibited than L929 normal fibroblast cells, is particularly noteworthy.

GC-MS analysis was employed to profile the volatile and semi-volatile compounds present in C. lentillifera hot water extracts prepared at 50ºC and 100ºC. Chromatographic profiles of both extracts revealed three major peaks at retention times of 10.551, 12.750, and 14.713 min, indicating the presence of three dominant metabolites. For both extraction temperatures, cyclohexasiloxane and cycloheptasiloxane were identified as the primary putative constituents. Similar siloxane derivatives have been detected in the GC-MS profiles of Caulerpa species and other green algae, suggesting these compounds may represent common volatile constituents extracted through aqueous and thermal processes (Li Y et al., 2021).

Interestingly, the identity of the third major peak diverged between the two extraction temperatures. In the 50ºC extract, the dominant compound was putatively identified as pentasiloxane, whereas the 100ºC extract yielded a benzoic acid derivative. This variation suggests that extraction temperature influences the relative abundance and type of extractable compounds, particularly those sensitive to thermal conditions. Because both extracts shared identical retention times but differed in peak intensities, it indicates that the hot water extraction temperature did not alter the qualitative composition of the extracts but rather influenced extraction efficiency.

The enhanced anticancer effects observed for the 100ºC extract in cytotoxicity, clonogenic, and migration assays may be ascribed to higher concentrations or improved availability of specific bioactive compounds, such as the detected benzoic acid derivative, rather than the formation of entirely new metabolites. However, because these profiles are based on preliminary GC-MS library matching, cyclohexasiloxane, cycloheptasiloxane, and the benzoic acid derivative remain putative constituents. Hence their specific contributions to the observed anticancer effects require further rigorous validation and compounding isolation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that hot water extract of C. lentillifera exhibited HCC cell progression which needs further investigation to confirm the significance of these metabolites.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bridging with Project No: R501-LR-RND003-0000001737-0000.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. Abruscato, G, Chiarelli, R, Lazzara, V, Punginelli, D, Sugár, S, & Mauro, M. (2023). In vitro cytotoxic effect of aqueous extracts from leaves and rhizomes of the seagrass posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on HepG2 liver cancer cells: Focus on autophagy and apoptosis. Biology, 12, 616.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. Azmin, S, Yunus, N, Mustaffa, A, Alwi, W, S, & Chua, L. (2015). A framework for solvent selection based on herbal extraction process design. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 1, 25–34.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. Brix, N, Samaga, D, Belka, C, Zitzelsberger, H, & Lauber, K. (2021). Analysis of clonogenic growth in vitro. Nature Protocols, 16, 4963–4991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00615-0CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. Chaiklahan, R, Srinorasing, T, Chirasuwan, N, Tamtin, M, & Bunnag, B. (2020). The potential of polysaccharide extracts from caulerpa lentillifera waste. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 161, 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.104CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. Cho, C, Lu, Y, Kim, M, Jeon, Y, & Lee, S. (2022). Therapeutic potential of seaweed-derived bioactive compounds for cardiovascular disease treatment. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031025CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. Choudhary, B, Chauhan, O, & Mishra, A. (2021). Edible seaweeds: A potential novel source of bioactive metabolites and nutraceuticals with human health benefits. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 740054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.740054CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. Gangwar, R, Rao, K. T, Khatun, S, Rengan, A. K, Subrahmanyam, C, & Vanjari, S. R. K. (2025). Aloe vera-driven green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: A facile approach for superior antibacterial activity and enhanced wound-healing. Applied Nanoscience, 15, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-025-03086-xCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. Gouthamchandra, K, Sudeep, H. V, Sathish, A, Basavegowda, L. H, Kumar, P, T, & Kodimule, S. P. (2024). Cardioprotective potential of Cardiboost, a standardized extract from terminalia arjuna bark against H2O2 induced oxidative stress in H9c2 cardiomyocytes. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2024.16.2CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. Guo, L, Hu, C, Yao, M, & Han, G. (2023). Mechanism of sorafenib resistance associated with ferroptosis in HCC. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14, 1207496. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1207496CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. Hung, O, Palaniveloo, K, & Moi, P. (2022). The effect of low temperature on biochemical properties and bioactivity of selected malaysian macroalgae species. OTEC/佐賀大学理工学部附属海洋熱エネルギー変換実験施設. 佐賀大学理工学部編, 26, 75–84.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. Hwang, S. Y, Danpanichkul, P, Agopian, V, Mehta, N, Parikh, N. D, & Abou-Alfa, G. K. (2024). Hepatocellular carcinoma: Updates on epidemiology, surveillance, diagnosis and treatment. Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, 31, S228.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. Ismail, M, Zokm, E, G, Lopez, M, & J (2023). Nutritional, bioactive compounds content, and antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds from the red sea. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10, 1210934.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. Koç, Sabancilar, Kaya, S, Mendeş, M, Keskin, C, & Eftekhari, A. (2026). In vitro cytotoxicity and antioxidant evaluation of oak (quercus sp.) And hazelnut shell (corylus avellana L.) Pyrolized wood vinegar: MTT assay and CUPRAC results. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 17, 399–411.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. Konappa, N, Udayashankar, A. C, Krishnamurthy, S, Pradeep, C. K, Chowdappa, S, & Jogaiah, S. (2020). GC–MS analysis of phytoconstituents from amomum nilgiricum and molecular docking interactions of bioactive serverogenin acetate with target proteins. Scientific Reports, 10, 16438.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. Kumarasinghe, H. S, & Gunathilaka, T. L. (2025). The role of seaweed derived bioactive compounds in preventing cellular senescence and aging. Natural Product Communications, 20, 1934578x251350769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x251350769CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. Li, Q, Ding, C, Cao, M, Yang, F, Yan, X, & He, S. (2024). Global epidemiology of liver cancer 2022: An emphasis on geographic disparities. Chinese Medical Journal, 137(19), 2334–2342.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. Li, Y, Zheng, Y, Zhang, Y, Yang, Y, Wang, P, & Imre, B. (2021). Brown algae carbohydrates: Structures, pharmaceutical properties, and research challenges. Marine Drugs, 19, 620.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. Manmuan, S, Sirirak, T, Tubtimsri, S, Petchsomrit, A, & Chuenbarn, T. (2025). Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant activity, and cytotoxic effects of caulerpa lentillifera extracts inducing cell apoptosis and sub-G/G0-G1 cell cycle arrest in KON oral cancer cells. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 25(1), 101.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. Nurkolis, F, Taslim, N. A, Qhabibi, F. R, Kang, S, Moon, M, & Choi, J. (2023). Ulvophyte green algae caulerpa lentillifera: Metabolites profile and antioxidant, anticancer, anti-obesity, and in vitro cytotoxicity properties. Molecules, 28(3), 1365.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. Permatasari, H. K, Bulain, S, Azizah, M. R, Muslim, F. Z, Daud, V. P. A, & Nurkolis, F. (2022b). Anticancer properties of caulerpa racemosa: A review study. Nutrición Clínica Y Dietética Hospitalaria, 42(3).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. Permatasari, H. K, Ulfa, B, E, N, Daud, A, V, P, Sulistomo, H. W, & Nurkolis, F. (2022a). Caulerpa racemosa extract inhibits HeLa cancer cells migration by altering expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition proteins. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, 1052238.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. Raihan, R, Azzeri, A, Shabaruddin, F. H, & Mohamed, R. (2018). Hepatocellular carcinoma in malaysia and its changing trend. Euroasian Journal of Hepato-gastroenterology, 8(1), 54.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. Rajasegaran, R, Elengoe, A, Hamd, A, M, A, Yahaya, N, & Hamid, S. (2024). Analysis of volatile compounds in caulerpa lentillifera for anti-proliferative studies in HEPG2 liver cancer cells and in silico comparison. Pharmacognosy Research, 16(4).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. Sangpairoj, K, Pranweerapaiboon, K, Saengkhae, C, Meemon, K, Niamnont, N, & Tamtin, M. (2024). Extracts of tropical green seaweed caulerpa lentillifera reduce hepatic lipid accumulation by modulating lipid metabolism molecules in HepG2 cells. Heliyon, 10(6).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. Syakilla, N, George, R, Chye, F, Pindi, W, Mantihal, S, & Wahab, N. (2022). A review on nutrients, phytochemicals, and health benefits of green seaweed, caulerpa lentillifera. Foods, 11, 2832.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. Tanawoot, V, Vivithanaporn, P, Siangcham, T, Meemon, K, Niamnont, N, & Sobhon, P. (2021). Hexane extract of seaweed caulerpa lentillifera inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis of human glioblastoma cells. Science & Technology Asia, 128-, 137.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. Tang, W, Chen, Z, Zhang, W, Cheng, Y, Zhang, B, & Wu, F. (2020). The mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: Theoretical basis and therapeutic aspects. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 5(1), 87.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. Tesvichian, S, Sangtanoo, P, Srimongkol, P, Saisavoey, T, Buakeaw, A, & Puthong, S. (2024). Sulfated polysaccharides from caulerpa lentillifera: Optimizing the process of extraction, structural characteristics, antioxidant capabilities, and anti-glycation properties. Heliyon, 10(2).GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. Tseng, P, Sinenko, I. L, Chambon, M, Banfi, D, Zugbi, S, & Cancela, M. B. (2026). High-throughput screening of drug libraries identifies a new synergistic drug combination for the treatment of retinoblastoma. PLOS ONE, 21(2), e0339334.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. Wen, T, Jin, C, Facciorusso, A, Donadon, M, Han, H, & Mao, Y. (2018). Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: An international expert consensus. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 7(5), 353.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  31. Wu, G, & Hsiao, P. (2024). Assessment of anti-prostate cancer activity among four seaweeds, with focus on caulerpa lentillifera. J. Agardh. Foods, 13(9), 1411.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  32. Zhang, J, Ma, T, Ke, L, Zhang, H, Hu, J, & Li, S. (2025). Neonatal bone marrow interstitial fluid supports expansion and osteogenic ability of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Bone Research, 13(1), 102.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  33. Zhou, Y, Li, Y, Zhou, T, Zheng, J, Li, S, & Li, H. (2016). Dietary natural products for prevention and treatment of liver cancer. Nutrients, 8(3), 156.GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Hambry, N. S. S., Mordi, M. N., & Hamid, S. B. S. (2026). GC-MS Profiling of Caulerpa lentillifera Hot Water Extract and it’s in vitro Effects on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Progression. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 18(3), 702-708. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.20260081

Copyright and licence

© 2026 Author(s)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0