Journal of Young Pharmacists logo
Submit
Journal of Young PharmacistsACADEMIC PUBLISHING
Article

Impact of Coronary Artery Diseases on the Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being

1, 1, 1, 1, 1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Pharmacy (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, HaryanaINDIA.

CORRESPONDENCE

Inderjeet Verma

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Pharmacy (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, HaryanaINDIA.

indupup@gmail.com

Received: 08-05-2025; Revised: 24-07-2025; Accepted: 15-09-2025.

Volume 17, Issue 4 · pp. 942-946 · 2025 · DOI: 10.5530/jyp.20250084

ABSTRACT

Background: Globally, the major source of morbidity and mortality is Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). In addition to its direct physiological effects, CAD has a significant effect on people's psychological well-being and Quality of Life (QoL), influencing several areas of functioning and adjustment.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study on 100 patients was done to examine the impact of CAD on QoL and psychological well-being. Qol was assessed using WHOQOL BREF, and psychological well-being was assessed using the PSS scale in the medicine ward. Results and Discussion: A total of 100 patients were selected for the study (61% females and 39% males; 14% 40 years). Subjects that were elders of the age group of > 40 had lower HRQoL scores in the domains of psycho, social, and environmental than those in the age group of 40 years reported much higher mean scores of PSS as compared to those under 40. Males also showed substantially higher mean scores (146.2±13.03) than females (98.8±8.96).Conclusion: CAD patients, especially females, have poor Qol and psychological well-being.

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

INTRODUCTION

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity characterized by inflammatory atherosclerotic pathogenesis, manifests as stable or unstable angina, Myocardial Infarction (MI), or sudden cardiac death due to plaque-induced obstruction causing myocardial oxygen demand-supply mismatch (Bottardi et al., 2024; Shahjehan et al., 2024). Its prevalence exhibits significant geographical, ethnic, and gender disparities (Malakar et al., 2019). Extensive epidemiological research, including the Framingham study, identifies key non-modifiable risk factors (age, genetics including homocystinuria) and modifiable factors: hypertension (strongly associated with CAD events, particularly in women), dyslipidemia (elevated LDL, low HDL), diabetes mellitus (conferring CAD risk equivalent to prior MI in non-diabetics), cigarette smoking (including second-hand and smokeless tobacco, RR 1.4-6.3), obesity (especially visceral adiposity, RR >5 for BMI>40), physical inactivity (independent of weight), and psychosocial stress (Brown et al., 2025). Within the US, CAD prevalence increases with age (projected 17.3 million cases by 2040), driving substantial healthcare costs ($126.2 billion in 2010) (Duggan et al., 2022). While some US risk factors show declining trends (smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, inactivity), others like age, diabetes, and obesity are increasing (Duggan et al., 2022). Management necessitates understanding these multifactorial risks, adopting preventive lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise), and utilizing evidence-based pharmacotherapy like statins, crucial for reducing the significant global burden of this atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (Malakar et al., 2019).

CAD profoundly diminishes Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), independently associated with greater fatigue and reduced exercise capacity, even after controlling for CAD severity and mental distress symptoms like depression and anxiety (Staniute et al., 2014). Specifically, multivariate analyses reveal that higher Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) scores (indicating greater fatigue) independently correlate with poorer scores across various Short Form-36 (SF-36) HRQoL domains: general fatigue with overall HRQoL (global SF-36 score), physical fatigue with physical functioning and pain, and mental fatigue with mental health (Foxwell et al., 2013). Reduced exercise capacity primarily impairs physical HRQoL domains (e.g., physical functioning), not mental health aspects (Foxwell et al., 2013). Psychosocial factors significantly influence the broader Quality of Life (QoL) in CAD patients. Hope exhibits a substantial positive correlation with QoL, while older age predicts lower QoL. Additionally, better social support and financial stability (e.g., family/government income source) improve it (Soleimani et al., 2022). This deterioration in HRQoL/QoL, linked to physical limitations, social isolation, and psychological burden, increases hospitalization and mortality risk.

As far as we can tell, there are only a few studies comparing QOL and psychological health in patients who have CHD. The main objective is to investigate the impact of coronary artery disease on quality of life and psychological well-being. The study will explain the mental health aspects of CAD among patients, and by doing so, the healthcare providers will be able to manage mental health challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample and setting

A cross-sectional observational study was used to explore the 100 CAD patients in the ICU of the Medicine Ward, M.M. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, Mullana, Ambala, for 6 months. The patients diagnosed with CAD were identified through the medical records, covering various age groups (18-80 years) of both genders, and were willing to provide informed consent. They were included in the study. Patients from other wards and those affected by severe medical or pandemic conditions that could confound the results will be excluded. The institutional ethics committee has approved the study for implementation (IEC No. 2740).

Study procedure

The study collected data from patients admitted to the Medicine Ward between December 2023 and April 2024. The study was explained to each participant, and the subject signed an informed consent form in both English and Hindi. The collected data included demographic details (name, age, gender, and IPD number), prescription information (including the final diagnosis), and a history of adverse events documented during follow-ups. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, while psychological well-being was evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).

Assessment of QOL using World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL BREF)

The WHOQOL-BREF is a widely used 26-item tool assessing Quality of Life (QoL), derived from the WHOQOL-100. It measures four domains: Physical (7 items), Psychological (6), Social (3), and Environmental (8), and two general items (Vahedi et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2015). The response scale for each item is a 5-point Likert scale. The item scores within a respective domain are summed and then divided by the number of items in that domain to obtain the domain scores. The next step involves multiplying these raw scores by four to standardise them, resulting in scores that range from 4 to 20. Furthermore, we use a similar form to obtain individual scores for each of the two general items (Bujang et al., 2023).

Assessment of Psychological Well-being using PSS

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a tool designed for measuring the extent to which people perceive events in their lives as stressful (Harris et al., 2023). When first formulated, the PSS was made up of 14 items and later on was pared down to a 10-item version, more efficient and containing 6 items framed negatively and 4 items framed positively (Pretorius et al., 2023).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 26.0 was used to do statistical analysis. After compilation, the information was displayed as Mean±Statistical Deviation (SD), numbers, and percentages (%). A p-value of p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Table 1 gives the demographic profiles of the participants involved in the study (n=100). More participants were male (61%). About 86% of all participants were over 40, and 14% were under 40 years old.

Table 2 shows the means and the standard deviation of the four WHOQOL-BREF and HRQoL domains among the respondents. HRQoL scores were consistently higher than WHOQoL scores across all domains. Environment had the highest scores, while Psychological had the lowest.

Table 3 represents the distribution of WHOQOL BREF components on the basis of age and gender. Scores varied substantially by age and gender. All domains are elevated in people over 40 years of age, and males showed an increase in WHOQOL domains compared to females. The largest differences appeared in the Environment domain.

Table 4 is a display of the HRQOL mean scores among different groups. Subjects that were above 40 years had lower HRQoL scores in the domains of psycho, social, and enviro than those in the age group of less than 40.

Table 5 shows each respondent’s score for every item of the questionnaire (PSS).

Table 6 depicts the mean value and standard deviation on the basis of Age and gender, among the PSS questionnaire. PSS scores differed significantly by age and gender. Participants under 40 years reported much higher mean scores compared to those above 40. Males also showed substantially higher mean scores than females (p<0.05).

Table 1: Demographics of the study participants included 100 subjects.
DescriptionFrequencyPercentage (%)
Gender
male3939
female6161
Age
<40 years1414
>40 years8686
Table 2: Mean scores for all four domains of WHOQOL-BREF and HRQOL.
DomainsWHOQoL Scores (Mean±SD)HRQoL Scores (Mean±SD)
Physical12.18±15.9651.125±15.96
Psychological11.71±16.1148.187± 16.11
Social11.87±27.0649.187± 27.06
Environment13.06±17.5856.625± 17.58
Table 3: Distribution of WHOQOL BREF based on Age and gender.
DomainsAge < 40Age > 40MaleFemale
Physical11.3±1.812.0±2.512.6±1.411.4±2.5
Psychological10.6±2.211.6±1.711.8±1.711.0±2.3
Social11.7±1.211.7±2.012.2±0.811.7±2.0
Environment12.2±1.112.4±1.712.4±1.512.1±1.6
Table 4: HRQOL mean scores among different groups in the sample.
PhysicalPsychologicalSocialEnvironmental
Gender
Male61.22±16.4567.83±17.0563.51±25.9360.95±18.13
Female61.31±15.7868.91±15.7163.57±27.6063.59±17.31
p-value0.9520.15830.9840.217
Age
< 40years41.85±7.7141.16± 3.8043.00±2.1644.12± 6.17
≥ 40years51.57±8.4153.33±10.4053.33±6.9481.37±24.03
p-value0.0940.0860.5460.853
Table 5: Distribution of Perceived Stress Scale items’ response (n=100).
StressNumber (n=100)Percentage (%)
Low22
Moderate9797
High11
Table 6: Distribution based on Age and Gender among the PSS questionnaire.
AgeMean±SDGenderMean±SD
< 4022.2±1.8Male28.5±8.0
> 4020.7±3.6Female21.0±3.5
p value0.08p value0.001

DISCUSSION

The objective of this study was to use validated measures like WHOQOL-BREF and the PSS to find out how CAD affects patients' QoL and mental health. This is one of the studies that considered the quality of life among patients with CAD; the information about this comparative aspect is limited. Our results show that CAD has a big effect on both the physical and mental health of patients, with mental health being the most affected. A notable outcome of our study was the fact that patients aged <40 years had a poorer QOL as compared to patients with CAD >40 years.

According to the findings of this study, the demographic characteristics reveal a predominance of male participants and a significant proportion over the age of 40, which aligns with existing literature that suggests CAD is more prevalent in older populations, particularly among men (Akhtar et al., 2023; Lima et al., 2023). In our study, the results of WHOQOL BREF indicate that while many participants reported positive health, certain domains, particularly physical and psychological, showed considerable inadequacies. Specifically, responses to questions regarding physical pain and daily activities reflect a troubling trend where patients experience significant limitations in their daily functioning. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated a strong negative correlation between physical impairments due to CAD and overall QoL (Muhammad et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2023). The psychological domain yielded the lowest mean scores, suggesting that emotional and psychological challenges are a critical concern for CAD patients. This is consistent with research that shows psychological well-being as the determinant for cardiovascular health outcomes. Factors like positive emotional expectations and emotional intensity correspond to the lower chances of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) (Vlachaki et al., 2013; Sin et al., 2016; Najafi et al., 2013; Hussein et al., 2024). Furthermore, studies have indicated that interventions to enhance psychological well-being can improve cardiovascular health metrics (Su et al., 2025). Age and gender appeared to influence QoL outcomes. Patients aged over 40 years exhibited lower scores in psychological, social, and environmental domains compared to younger patients. Similarly, female patients reported lower QoL scores than male patients. These trends are consistent with studies highlighting that older age and female gender are associated with diminished QoL in CAD populations (Frøjd et al., 2023; Lanini et al., 2024; Kasaudhan et al., 2024). As per Singh et al., the environmental domain performed relatively better. These findings imply that it is crucial to design some special interventions to address the problem of psychological and physical health in older patients with CAD (Singh et al., 2022).

The results from the PSS indicate elevated stress levels among participants, which may further exacerbate their health outcomes. Previous research has established a link between high stress levels and poorer cardiovascular health, suggesting that managing stress could be a vital component of comprehensive care for CAD patients (Gao et al., 2024; Malik et al., 2021). In our study, ICU patients showed high stress prevalence and poor mental well-being, and we observed no gender differences. Similarly, Kuhail et al. confirm that higher stress worsens CAD. A 9% increased risk of severe CAD for each point on a stress scale, with stronger effects in women, was found. Both studies highlight older patients as particularly vulnerable (Kuhail et al., 2022). A study by Gupta et al., revealed high stress prevalence and impaired psychological well-being. However, while younger patients showed greater stress in this study, our CAD population exhibited worse quality of life among older individuals (>40 years) (Gupta et al., 2023). These findings collectively underline the need for routine psychological assessment in cardiac care while highlighting potential differences in psychosocial profiles between acute and chronic cardiovascular conditions that may warrant tailored intervention approaches (Gupta et al., 2023). Unsar et al., show CAD causes significant stress and reduces quality of life, especially in patients over 40, similar to our results. Our measured stress levels confirm previous reports of anxiety/depression. Both found that physical health is the most affected area, linking physical symptoms to psychological distress like diminished hope (Unsar et al., 2007).

The study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small, which makes it hard to apply the results to larger groups of people. The study also used self-reported measures (WHOQOL-BREF and PSS), which might be affected by recall bias and social desirability bias.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the complex relationship between CAD, psychological health, and QoL, significantly influenced by age. Patients under 40 reported better overall QoL but greater psychological distress, likely due to the shock of an early diagnosis. Conversely, patients over 40 experienced poorer QoL across all domains but showed fewer acute psychological issues, possibly due to developed coping strategies. The study's higher proportion of female participants warrants further investigation into gender differences in CAD experience and care.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the idea and design of the work, the collection of data, the analysis and interpretation of data, the drafting of the article or its critical revision for significant intellectual content

Ethics Statement

The study was performed after the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval (IEC No. 2740) of MM Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Hospital, Mullana-Ambala.

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. Akhtar, N, Paul, P, Kumar, T, & Paul, U. K. (2023). Prevalence of coronary artery disease and the associated risk factors among the patients attending the medicine department in a tertiary care teaching hospital in the north eastern zone in india. International Journal of Advances in Medicine, 10(12), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233565CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. Bottardi, A, Prado, G. F. A, Lunardi, M, Fezzi, S, Pesarini, G, Tavella, D, Scarsini, R, & Ribichini, F. (2024). Clinical updates in coronary artery disease: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(16), 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164600CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. Brown, J. C, Gerhardt, T. E, & Kwon, E. (2025). Risk factors for coronary artery disease. In Statpearls.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. Bujang, M. A, Lai, W. H, Hon, Y. K, Yap, E. P. P, Tiong, X. T, Ratnasingam, S, Kim, A. R. J, Husin, M, Jee, Y. Y. H, Ahmad, N. F. D, & Haniff, J. (2023). Measuring population health and quality of life: Developing and testing of the significant quality of life measure (SigQOLM). Heliyon, 9(12), Article E22668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22668CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. Duggan, J. P, Peters, A. S, Trachiotis, G. D, & Antevil, J. L. (2022). Epidemiology of coronary artery disease. The Surgical Clinics of North America, 102(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.007CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. Foxwell, R, Morley, C, & Frizelle, D. (2013). Illness perceptions, mood and quality of life: A systematic review of coronary heart disease patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.05.003CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. Frøjd, L. A, Munkhaugen, J, Papageorgiou, C, Sverre, E, Moum, T, & Dammen, T. (2023). Predictors of health-related quality of life in outpatients with coronary heart disease. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1119093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119093CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. Gao, Y, Chen, Y, Hu, R, Tian, C, Zhang, Y, Wei, Y, Shi, Y, Xu, Y, & Ma, J. (2024). High perceived stress predicts worse clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Depression and Anxiety, Article 6652769. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6652769CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. Gupta, M. D, Kunal, S, Jha, M, Girish, M. P, Mishra, P, Shukla, M, Bundela, N, Batra, V, Bansal, A, Mukhopadhyay, S, & Yusuf, J. (2023). Psychosocial stress and well-being in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction in a tertiary care center. Indian Heart Journal, 75(4), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.06.006CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. Harris, K. M, Gaffey, A. E, Schwartz, J. E, Krantz, D. S, & Burg, M. M. (2023). The perceived stress scale as a measure of stress: Decomposing score variance in longitudinal behavioral medicine studies. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 57(10), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaad015CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. Hussein, A, Ahmed, S. H, El-Fetoh, N. M, & Mohamed, E. R. (2024). Quality of life of elderly cardiac patients with multimorbidity and burnout among their caregivers. The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-024-00384-8CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  12. Kasaudhan, S, Saraswathy, K. N, & Chaudhary, V. (2024). Quality of life and its sociodemographic determinants: A population-based study from rural Punjab, india. Discover Social Science and Health, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-024-00085-1CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  13. Kuhail, M, Djafarian, K, Shab-Bidar, S, & Khadoura, K. J. (2022). Association of perceived stress and physical activity level with severity of coronary artery disease in gaza Strip, Palestine: A cross-sectional study. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 43(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.21.0125CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  14. Lanini, L. L. S, Euler, S, Zuccarella-Hackl, C, Artiles, F, R, Niederseer, D, Auschra, B, Känel, V, R, & Jellestad, L. (2024). Differential associations of sex and age with changes in HRQoL during outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of Patient-reported Outcomes, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00688-xCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  15. Malakar, A. K, Choudhury, D, Halder, B, Paul, P, Uddin, A, & Chakraborty, S. (2019). A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 234(10), 16812–16823. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28350CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  16. Malik, A. O, Peri-Okonny, P, Gosch, K, Thomas, M. B, Mena-Hurtado, C, Hiatt, W, Aronow, H. D, Jones, P. G, Provance, J, Labrosciano, C, Jelani, Q, Spertus, J. A, & Smolderen, K. G. (2021). Association of perceived stress with health status outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 140, Article 110313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110313CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  17. Muhammad, I, He, H, Kowitlawakul, Y, & Wang, W. (2016). Narrative review of health-related quality of life and its predictors among patients with coronary heart disease. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 22(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12356CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  18. Najafi, M, Sheikhvatan, M, Montazeri, A, & Sheikhfatollahi, M. (2013). Factor structure of the world health Organization’s quality of life Questionnaire-BREF in patients with coronary artery disease. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4(9), 1052–1058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3793487/PubMedGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  19. Pretorius, T. B. (2023). The perceived stress scale is essentially unidimensional: Complementary evidence from ancillary bifactor indices and mokken analysis. Acta Psychologica, 241, Article 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104058CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  20. Santos, L. D, & C (2023). C, Matharoo, A. S, Pinzón Cueva, E, Amin, U, Perez Ramos, A. A, Mann, N. K, Maheen, S, Butchireddy, J, Falki, V. B, Itrat, A, Rajkumar, N, Zia Ul Haq, M. the Influence of Sex, Age, and Race on Coronary Artery Disease: a Narrative Review. Cureus, 15(10), Article E47799. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47799CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  21. Shahjehan, R. D, Sharma, S, & Bhutta, B. S. (2024). Coronary artery disease. In Statpearls.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  22. Sin, N. L. (2016). The protective role of positive well-being in cardiovascular disease: Review of current evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Current Cardiology Reports, 18(11), 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0792-zCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  23. Singh, A, Palaniyandi, S, Palaniyandi, A, & Gupta, V. (2022). Health related quality of life among rural elderly using WHOQOL-bref in the most backward district of india. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(3), 1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1073_21CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  24. Soleimani, M. A, Zarabadi-Pour, S, Chan, H, Y, Allen, K, & Shamsizadeh, M. (2022). Factors associated with hope and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. The Journal of Nursing Research, 30(2), e200. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000476CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  25. Staniute, M, Bunevicius, A, Brozaitiene, J, & Bunevicius, R. (2014). Relationship of health-related quality of life with fatigue and exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 13(4), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515113496942CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  26. Su, J. J, Lin, R, Batalik, L, Wong, A. K. C, & Grace, S. L. (2025). Psychological EHealth interventions for patients with cardiovascular diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article E57368. https://doi.org/10.2196/57368CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  27. Thompson, H. M, Reisner, S. L, VanKim, N, & Raymond, H. F. (2015). Quality-of-life measurement: Assessing the WHOQOL-bref scale in a sample of high-HIV-risk transgender women in san Francisco, california. The International Journal of Transgenderism, 16(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2015.1039176CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  28. Unsar, S, Sut, N, & Durna, Z. (2007). Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(6), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JCN.0000297382.91131.8dCrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR
  29. Vahedi, S. (2010). World health organization quality-of-Life scale (WHOQOL-bref): Analyses of their item response theory properties based on the graded responses model. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 5(4), 140–153.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  30. Vlachaki, C, Kassotaki, M, & K (2013). Coronary heart disease and emotional intelligence. Global Journal of Health Science, 5(6), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v5n6p156CrossrefGOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Jain, M., Tandon, D., Vohra, V., Saini, A., & Verma, I. (2025). Impact of Coronary Artery Diseases on the Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 17(4), 942-946. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.20250084

Copyright and licence

© 2025 Author(s)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0