Home Full text Impact of Vroman’s Effect on Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics on Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems

Impact of Vroman’s Effect on Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics on Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems

by admin

1Department of Pharmaceutics, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER)- Autonomous, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

2Department of Industrial Pharmacy, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education andResearch (RIPER)- Autonomous, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

3Department of Quality Assurance, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education andResearch (RIPER)- Autonomous, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence Dr. Chinthaginjala Haranath,, Associate Professor and Head, Department of Pharmaceutics, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER), KR Palli Cross, Chiyyedu Post, Anantapur-515721, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA
Received: 21 April 2022; Revised: 09 June 2022; Accepted: 23 July 2022.
Copyright ©2022 Phcog.Net
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Published in: J Young Pharm 2022; 14(4): 355; Published online: October 2022 DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2022.14.72

ABSTRACT

Nanoparticle drug delivery can produce a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effect and unveiled better safety in vivo and in vitro toxicity profiles when compared with conventional drugs. In 1960, Vroman revealed that competitive protein exchange is a general phenomenon that occurs when a protein mixture adsorbs to a surface is called ‘Vroman’s effect’ which is responsible for the fate of the nanoparticles. The development and formation of protein corona on nanoparticles is due to the adsorption of proteins on the surface. It is vital in specific targeting and alter the size and composition of the nanoparticle. The entropy-driven binding manages this adsorption of protein on the surface. Binding of polyethylene glycol to the nanoparticles decreases the non-specific binding and increases the targeting of tissue via enhanced permeability and retention effect. An individual disease state and components in biofluids can modify the structure and shape of protein corona on nanoparticles. By label-free transducers, we can detect targets using Vroman’s effect. The biological identification of nanoparticles can lead to deleterious consequences, such as immunotoxicity, due to the formation of the protein corona

Keywords: Vromans effect, Nanoparticles, Protein corona, Disease state, Biofluids

INTRODUCTION

Nano-drug delivery shows long-term effectiveness in the blood and produces therapeutic action up to a specific period. Nano-drug delivery can deliver the drug to the mutated cells by carrying the diversified cargos, including the hydrophobic and amphiphilic drugs and genes.1

Nanoparticle drug delivery can produce a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effect. After entering the nanoparticles (NP) into the body, they interact with proteins present in the blood. By giving drugs in low doses, it minimizes the chances of drug toxicity.26 Nano-drug delivery systems decrease dosage frequency, improve patient compliance, safety and biocompatibility, minimize toxic effect and maintain therapeutic effect (Figure 1). Physicists have studied the Vroman effect, in which proteins bound on a surface are displaced by later entering proteins. Competitive protein exchange is a general phenomenon that occurs when a protein mixture adsorbs to a surface.7

Figure 1.
Unique properties of Nanoparticle drug delivery.

The Fate of Nanoparticles in the Biological Milieu – Vromans Effect

The outcome of nanoparticles is mostly determined by their fundamental features. For example, upon entering the body, they interact with proteins in the blood.

Effect of protein corona on nanoparticles

The serum is the non-cellular component in the blood consisting of 3000-3700 various types of proteins. Fibrinogen in the circulation plays a significant role in drug delivery by designing negatively charged nanoparticles. By the modification of proteins on a surface immunological response of the body can be triggered.

Hard and soft coronas

The hard, soft, and interfacial protein coronas make up the protein corona on the Nanoparticle surface. The Corona consists of a strongly bonded monolayer, whereas the soft part is bounded and present on the top, and rapid exchange of proteins occurs.810 The Vromans effect involves the exchange of proteins competitively on the surface of a protein mixture. Small molecular proteins were initially coated and adsorbed onto the surface, followed by larger molecular weight proteins. This protein interchange was depending on the molecular weight of the proteins – ranging from low to high.11

Development of the protein corona – molecular aspects

The fate of nanoparticles is determined by the coat of protein corona that surrounds their surface. The type of corona formation on the nanoparticles could depend upon the binding strength, dissociation rate, surface area and charge. Blood contains different types of proteins like a soft and hard corona.12

Impact of the np-biomolecule corona on the biological system

Polyethylene glycol-modified the surface of the nanoparticles decreases the degradation of immune-mediated Nanoparticle or folic acid, over expresses folate receptors, and enhances the intended site drug delivery. The uneven development of blood vessels in the tumor setting has resulted in leaky vasculature.1316 The ideal parameters of the surface ligand of the nanoparticles are modified for effective targeting. Other variables, such as tumour kind, level, height, and systolic blood pressure, among others, have a significant impact.1719 In this domain, PEGylation has become the global standard. According to several studies, binding of PEG to NPs reduces non-specific serum protein binding, improving the targeting of passive tumor tissue via the EPR effect.20

Choosing the optimal surface density and PEG length for the NP delivery procedure is crucial. In certain situations, various preparations of PEG-liposome generated unique coronas on NPs, inhibiting cellular absorption. Increased PEG length lowered liposome protein adsorption, apolipoprotein affinities, and even the absolute amount of opsonins collected.21 On the other hand, Papi et al.22 PEGylation of Onivyde, a liposomal FDA-approved medicine, was revealed to be somewhat vital than particulate chemistry for stealth effects. Whereas prolonged circulation times are necessary for active targeting, effective absorption of NPcargo by target cells is essential for therapeutic efficacy.

Factors Influencing Corona Formation

The nanoparticle nature of the protein corona is modified by the volume, shape, and polarity of the particles (Figure 2). In vivo studies of nanoparticles have shown the effect of particle shape on protein corona formation. Gold nanoparticles incubated in mouse blood form nano star, nanorods and nanostars. The total amount of protein composition altered their size and form.23 The size of the nanoparticles is vital for protein corona formation. The binding strength of 30nm particles with platelet factor 4 was double that of massive particles. Binding 200nm particles to apolipoprotein A-I and serum albumin was twice that of other ranges.24 The particle charge influence on corona formation is examined by incubating negatively charged polystyrene and positively charged amino-conjugated nanoparticles in human plasma. Complement C1r, Apolipoprotein F, and mannose-binding protein are responsible for the development of corona on positively charged nanoparticles.25 These differences produced by the nanoparticles a zeta potential at -10mV to -20mV range, independent of the physiochemistry of nanoparticles.26 Vroman dynamic effect is observed by complement c3 binding to iron oxide nano-worms by the in vivo study. Human plasma incubated c3 particles were recovered and administered into a c3-deficient animal, which recovered 5 min later. After injection on non-precoated particles, natural murine c3 was preserved, and protein adsorption and de-adsorption of nanoparticles in complex dynamics were observed.27 The unique manner of corona formed on the particles based on their environment is determined by fingerprinting.28 Most of the dynamic process is seen in the soft corona over 30nm thick, turned a protein cloud. It consists of protein stacks supported by plasma proteins ranging from 3-15nm in diameter. The layer of soft Corona is thicker than the hard corona layer.2931

Figure 2.
Factors that influence corona formation.

By incubating gold nanorods in immunoglobulin G(IgG), Human Serum Albumin at specific concentrations protein concentration was analyzed. Soft corona contains a high concentration when compared with hard corona.32 Protein corona has a different dynamic effect on abundant proteins in the circulation and proteins that inhabit the corona. Serum albumin was the highest concentration present in the blood. In comparison, the protein alpha 1 antitrypsin exhibited high concentrations in the protein corona compared to blood. A study by Bovin et al.33 assessed the twenty most abundant proteins by focusing on biological functioning. Coagulation factor and lipoproteins classes increased the protein corona, whereas molecular transport-related proteins decreased. These studies suggest that evaluating the protein Corona formation in in vitro and in-vivo samples is necessary because it impacts biological activity.

DISEASE STATE ON CORONA FORMATION

The Vroman effect can be explained without using any bioreceptors. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) may be a label-free technique. The adsorption of proteins is examined by angle shift SPR, i.e., high molecular proteins displace low relative molecular mass proteins.34 An individual’s disease state or lifestyle may alter plasma proteome and also the shape of a PC. For instance, protein glycation improves the anaerobic metabolism of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) in diabetic patients, allowing soluble albumin to decrease.35 Liver diseases can also alter the detected amount of albumin in the blood. Therefore, as therapeutic biomarkers, some plasma proteins, including albumin, help to diagnose medical conditions.36 Smoking contributes to increases in nitro tyrosine plasma protein alterations, decreasing fibrinogen (coagulation factor) and surfactant protein (SP)-A.37 The cancer secretome refers to the huge amount of proteins released into physiological secretions by cancer cells and organs. Hundreds of tumor-derived proteins, such as autoantibodies, have been discovered. Plasma proteomes from disease states such as cancer can contribute to the production of coronas on NPs.3740 Muller et al.41 Research focused on how polymeric NPs infuse lipids into the PC, Physicochemical properties of two oppositely charged lipid nanoparticles treated with plasma from patients with pancreatic cancer or stable have been studied. The zeta potential of simple, ionised NPs incubated in plasma from pancreatic and healthy people differed only little, hinting that NPs with differing charges might attract distinct proteins.4243 NPs function as a nano-concentrator by generating a corona peculiar to the liquid sample and isolating rare plasma proteins with therapeutic value.44 A study of the properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) generated underlying flaws, which was not detected with stable mouse serum. Protein corona (PC) may be generated by an overabundance of cholesterol binding to NPs in other proteins. Lipids play a key role in PC proliferation.4546

Research by Shannahan et al.47 shows the capacity for the inflammatory response aortic endothelial cells of sera-treated iron oxide NPs from hyperlipidemic individuals show capacity for an inflammatory response. Intermediates such as glucose or cholesterol impact the immunogenicity of fibrinogen-NP complexes. Modifying plasma components and influencing the development of NP coronas are also conceivable. NPs travel through the lining of the Respiratory tract fluid (RTLF) and produce a corona that depicts the RTLF composition, which may include inborn immunity proteins like SP-A.48 Surprisingly, the RTLF elicited a PC in asthma patients that decreased surfactant proteins and metal-handling proteins while boosting alpha-1-antitrypsin on NPs.49 When inhaled NPs interact with the pulmonary surfactant substrate, they can form a PC that differs from that produced in the blood. The PCs produced on NPs comprised core proteins, like as SP-A, SP-B, and SP-D, and lipids, which appeared to be devoid of molecule properties.5051

BIO-FLUIDS MODULATE THE STRUCTURE OF CORONA

The structure of the corona is modulated by the biofluids present in the body. Corona protein’s long-term development is influenced by the physical and chemical features of nanoparticles. The underlying biological environment is the most effective tool for encouraging the PC structure.5253 Protein absorbent in the surrounding atmosphere was depending on protein content, according to an early investigation of NPs in plasma utilising silica and sulfonated polystyrene NPs. This was one of several studies to indicate that because of environment-influenced variations in the PC, the same NPs can behave differently.54

Another study found that minor discrepancies in the PC generated onNPs canoccur due to factors such as blood selection, whether whole using EDTA or RPMI and PBS media to counteract coagulation.55 The detection and behavior of NPs have vital implications for the design of nanomaterials as diagnosis and treatment plan, affected by changes in the physiological system. NPs were developed for human PCs containing immunoglobulins, supplements, and apolipoproteins, while different proteins, such as fibrinogen, were absorbed by the same NPs in the mouse serum.56

NANOTOXICITY AND THE BIOMOLECULE CORONA

The formation of the Precursor polycyclic plate (PC) by macrophages can alter the identification of non-potentiated Phagocytic Phosphates (NP) in response to Bovin Serum Albumin. By potentiating NPs holding titanium dioxide (TiO2) in the PC, enhanced release of inflammatory cytokines IL-1ß and IL-6 from human macrophage was seen.57 PC was made with disulfide-stabilized poly(methacyl) acid nonporous polymeric NPs, which inhibited the NPs’ ability to be internalised by human monocytes (THP-1) in a way similar to how BSA defined FBS-containing media for PC development.58

CONCLUSION

Vroman has observed competitive exchange of proteins on the surface of nanoparticles. Nanoparticles interact with body fluids like blood and forms corona on the nanoparticles surface. Corona size and composition are altered by the generated corona, which varies depending on the protein present in the surroundings. The creation of hard corona around nanoparticles is primarily due to apolipoprotein A-1, whereas Human serum albumin is responsible for forming soft corona in the biological environment. Disease state can be detected by label free transducers by using Vromans effect.

Cite this article

Haranath C, Vamsi KS, Qarmout YAM, Ahad HA, Chandana S. Impact of Vroman’s Effect on Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics on Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems. J Young Pharm. 2022;14(4):355-8.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edgar JYC, Wang H. Introduction for design of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(14):2108-12. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  2. Rawal T, Patel S, Butani S. Chitosan nanoparticles as a promising approach for pulmonary delivery of bedaquiline. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;124:273-87. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  3. Angioletti-Uberti S, Ballauff M, Dzubiella J. Competitive adsorption of multiple proteins to nanoparticles: The Vroman effect revisited. Mol Phys. 2018;116(21-22):3154-63. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  4. Karmali PP, Simberg D. Interactions of nanoparticles with plasma proteins: Implication on clearance and toxicity of drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(3):343-57. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar L, Verma S, Bhardwaj A, Vaidya S, Vaidya B. Eradication of superficial fungal infections by conventional and novel approaches: A comprehensive review. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2014;42(1):32-46. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  6. De Jong WH, Borm PJ. Drug delivery and nanoparticles: Applications and hazards. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(2):133-49. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirsh SL, McKenzie DR, Nosworthy NJ, Denman JA, Sezerman OU, Bilek MM, et al. The Vroman effect: Competitive protein exchange with dynamic multilayer protein aggregates. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:395-404. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu N, Tang M, Ding J. The interaction between nanoparticles-protein corona complex and cells and its toxic effect on cells. Chemosphere. 2020;245:125624 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  9. Winzen S, Schoettler S, Baier G, Rosenauer C, Mailaender V, Landfester K, et al. Complementary analysis of the hard and soft protein corona: Sample preparation critically effects corona composition. Nanoscale. 2015;7(7):2992-3001. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  10. Kharazian B, Hadipour NL, Ejtehadi MR. Understanding the nanoparticle– protein corona complexes using computational and experimental methods. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;75:162-74. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi S, Yang Y, Chae J. Surface plasmon resonance protein sensor using Vroman effect. Biosens Bioelectron. 2008;24(4):899-905. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  12. Lundqvist M, Augustsson C, Lilja M, Lundkvist K, Dahlbäck B, Linse S, et al. The nanoparticle protein corona formed in human blood or human blood fractions. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0175871 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonvin D, Bastiaansen JAM, Stuber M, Hofmann H, Mionic Ebersold MM. Folic acid on iron oxide nanoparticles: Platform with high potential for simultaneous targeting, MRI detection and hyperthermia treatment of lymph node metastases of prostate cancer. Dalton Trans. 2017;46(37):12692-704. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  14. Flores O, Santra S, Kaittanis C, Bassiouni R, Khaled AS, Khaled AR, et al. PSMA-targeted theranostic nanocarrier for prostate cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7(9):2477-94. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Z, Wang H, Tan T, Li J, Wang Z, Li Y, et al. Rational design of nanoparticles with deep tumor penetration for effective treatment of tumor metastasis. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(40):1801840 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  16. Matsumura Y, Maeda H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986;46(12 Pt 1):6387-92. [PubMed] | [Google Scholar]
  17. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R, et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751-60. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  18. Nichols JW, Bae YH. EPR: Evidence and fallacy. J Control Release. 2014;190:451-64. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  19. Salvati A, Pitek AS, Monopoli MP, Prapainop K, Bombelli FB, Hristov DR, et al. Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8(2):137-43. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  20. Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM. PEG ylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99(A):28-51. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  21. Pozzi D, Colapicchioni V, Caracciolo G, Piovesana S, Capriotti AL, Palchetti S, et al. Effect of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) chain length on the bio–nano-interactions between pegylated lipid nanoparticles and biological fluids: From nanostructure to uptake in cancer cells. Nanoscale. 2014;6(5):2782-92. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  22. Papi M, Caputo D, Palmieri V, Coppola R, Palchetti S, Bugli F, et al. Clinically approved pegylated nanoparticles are covered by a protein corona that boosts the uptake by cancer cells. Nanoscale. 2017;9(29):10327-34. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  23. García-Álvarez R, Hadjidemetriou M, Sánchez-Iglesias A, Liz-Marzán LM, Kostarelos K. Array. Nanoscale. 2018;10(3):1256-64. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu Z, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wu R, Zou H. Nanoparticle size matters in the formation of plasma protein coronas on FeO nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;121:354-61. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  25. Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, Lynch I, Cedervall T, Dawson KA, et al. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(38):14265-70. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  26. Alkilany AM, Nagaria PK, Hexel CR, Shaw TJ, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD, et al. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: Molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small. 2009;5(6):701-8. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen F, Wang G, Griffin JI, Brenneman B, Banda NK, Holers VM, et al. Complement proteins bind to nanoparticle protein corona and undergo dynamic exchange . Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(4):387-93. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  28. Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Cedervall T, Berggård T, Flanagan MB, Lynch I, et al. The evolution of the protein corona around nanoparticles: A test study. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):7503-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  29. Docter D, Westmeier D, Markiewicz M, Stolte S, Knauer SK, Stauber RH, et al. The nanoparticle biomolecule corona: Lessons learned – challenge accepted?. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(17):6094-121. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi HS, Liu W, Misra P, Tanaka E, Zimmer JP, Itty Ipe BI, et al. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(10):1165-70. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  31. Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB, et al. Physical− chemical aspects of protein corona: Relevance to and biological impacts of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(8):2525-34. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  32. Alex SA, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A. Impact of gold nanorod functionalization on biocorona formation and their biological implication. J Mol Liq. 2017;248:703-12. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  33. Bonvin D, Aschauer U, Alexander DTL, Chiappe D, Moniatte M, Hofmann H, et al. Protein corona: Impact of lymph versus blood in a complex environment. Small. 2017;13(29):1700409 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  34. Schaaij-Visser TB, De Wit M, Lam SW, Jiménez CR. The cancer secretome, current status and opportunities in the lung, breast and colorectal cancer context. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834(11):2242-58. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  35. Pradeep T, Haranath C. A review on diabetes mellitus Type II. Int J Pharm Res Rev. 2014;3(9):23-9. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  36. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: History, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1(11):845-67. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  37. Jin H, Webb-Robertson BJ, Peterson ES, Tan R, Bigelow DJ, Scholand MB, et al. Smoking, COPD, and 3-nitrotyrosine levels of plasma proteins. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(9):1314-20. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  38. Loke SY, Lee ASG. The future of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;92:54-68. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  39. Hajipour MJ, Laurent S, Aghaie A, Rezaee F, Mahmoudi M. Personalized protein coronas: A ”key” factor at the nanobiointerface. Biomater Sci. 2014;2(9):1210-21. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  40. Hajipour MJ, Raheb J, Akhavan O, Arjmand S, Mashinchian O, Rahman M, et al. Personalized disease-specific protein corona influences the therapeutic impact of graphene oxide. Nanoscale. 2015;7(19):8978-94. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  41. Müller J, Prozeller D, Ghazaryan A, Kokkinopoulou M, Mailänder V, Morsbach S, et al. Beyond the protein corona – lipids matter for biological response of nanocarriers. Acta Biomater. 2018;71:420-31. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  42. Colapicchioni V, Tilio M, Digiacomo L, Gambini V, Palchetti S, Marchini C, et al. Personalized liposome–protein corona in the blood of breast, gastric and pancreatic cancer patients. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;75:180-7. biocel.2015.09.002 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  43. Caputo D, Papi M, Coppola R, Palchetti S, Digiacomo L, Caracciolo G, et al. A protein corona-enabled blood test for early cancer detection. Nanoscale. 2017;9(1):349-54. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  44. Zheng T, Pierre-Pierre N, Yan X, Huo Q, Almodovar AJ, Valerio F, et al. Gold nanoparticle-enabled blood test for early-stage cancer detection and risk assessment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(12):6819-27. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  45. Tavakol M, Montazeri A, Naghdabadi R, Hajipour MJ, Zanganeh S, Caracciolo G, et al. Disease-related metabolites affect protein–nanoparticle interactions. Nanoscale. 2018;10(15):7108-15. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  46. Raghavendra AJ, Fritz K, Fu S, Brown JM, Podila R, Shannahan JH, et al. Variations in biocorona formation related to defects in the structure of single walled carbon nanotubes and the hyperlipidemic disease state. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8382 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  47. Shannahan JH, Fritz KS, Raghavendra AJ, Podila R, Persaud I, Brown JM, et al. From the cover: Disease-induced disparities in formation of the nanoparticlebiocorona and the toxicological consequences. Toxicol Sci. 2016;152(2):406-16. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar A, Bicer EM, Morgan AB, Pfeffer PE, Monopoli M, Dawson KA, et al. Enrichment of immunoregulatory proteins in the biomolecular corona of nanoparticles within human respiratory tract lining fluid. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(4):1033-43. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  49. Kumar A, Bicer EM, Pfeffer P, Monopoli MP, Dawson KA, Eriksson J, et al. Differences in the coronal proteome acquired by particles depositing in the lungs of asthmatic versus healthy humans. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(8):2517-21. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  50. Raesch SS, Tenzer S, Storck W, Rurainski A, Selzer D, Ruge CA, et al. Proteomic and lipidomic analysis of nanoparticle corona upon contact with lung surfactant reveals differences in protein, but not lipid composition. ACS Nano. 2015;9(12):11872-85. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  51. Whitwell H, Mackay RM, Elgy C, Morgan C, Griffiths M, Clark H, et al. Nanoparticles in the lung and their protein corona: The few proteins that count. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(9):1385-94. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  52. Pieper R, Gatlin CL, Makusky AJ, Russo PS, Schatz CR, Miller SS, et al. The human serum proteome: Display of nearly 3700 chromatographically separated protein spots on two‐dimensional electrophoresis gels and identification of 325 distinct proteins. Proteomics. 2003;3(7):1345-64. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  53. Shannahan J. The biocorona: A challenge for the biomedical application of nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Rev. 2017;6(4):345-53. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  54. Walkey CD, Chan WC. Understanding and controlling the interaction of nanomaterials with proteins in a physiological environment. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2780-99. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  55. Strojan K, Leonardi A, Bregar VB, Križaj I, Svete J, Pavlin M, et al. Dispersion of nanoparticles in different media importantly determines the composition of their protein corona. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0169552 pone.0169552 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  56. Solorio-Rodríguez A, Escamilla-Rivera V, Uribe-Ramírez M, Chagolla A, Winkler R, García-Cuellar CM, et al. A comparison of the human and mouse protein corona profiles of functionalized SiO 2 nanocarriers. Nanoscale. 2017;9(36):13651-60. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  57. Borgognoni CF, Mormann M, Qu Y, Schäfer M, Langer K, Öztürk C, et al. Reaction of human macrophages on protein corona covered TiO nanoparticles. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]