ABSTRACT
The pharmaceutical industry is currently welcoming a digital revolution known as Pharma 4.0, which builds upon the principles of Industry 4.0 to improve product quality, operational efficiency, and compliance. This transformation uses state-of-the-art technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), AI, big data analytics, and blockchain to create smarter, more flexible manufacturing processes. This review explores how Pharma 4.0 tools help strengthen process reliability in pharmaceutical production. It examines how digital integration influences Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), ensures regulatory compliance, and boosts overall operational effectiveness. A thorough review of existing literature, including peer-reviewed articles, regulatory guidance, and practical case studies related to Pharma 4.0, was conducted. The focus is on digital solutions that monitor Critical Process Parameters (CPPs), use predictive analytics, and support frameworks like Quality by Design (QbD) and Process Analytical Technology (PAT). Incorporating smart technologies enhances process consistency, reduces human error, and allows for real-time quality oversight. Utilizing robotic automation and intelligent sensors improves data collection and assists adaptive feedback loops. Real-world case studies emphasize successful deployments of Pharma 4.0 tools in areas like predictive maintenance, real-time process monitoring, and regulatory compliance, resulting in less variability and more reliable products. Eventually, Pharma 4.0 represents a major shift in pharmaceutical manufacturing, helping to make processes more resilient and supporting data-driven decision-making. However, its success depends on regulatory adjustments, collaboration across disciplines, and addressing challenges around data integrity and system validation.
INTRODUCTION
The Industrial Revolution evolved through three phases: the First (late 1700s) introduced steam power and mechanized textiles; the Second (late 1800s) brought steel, electricity, and mass production; and the Third (mid-1900s) ushered in digital technology and automation. Today, Industry 4.0-characterized by digital integration-is transforming pharmaceuticals into pharma. Going beyond automation, Pharma 4.0 integrates IoT, AI, and big data to build “Smart Factories,” enhancing process reliability and product quality. Advanced analytics aid troubleshooting, while personalized medicine requires adaptable production systems. This study explores key Industry 4.0 technologies in pharma, their impact on agility, efficiency, and quality, and the challenges of integration and future directions (Reinhardtet al., 2018). Industry 4.0, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, integrates digital technologies to create smart, connected, and adaptive manufacturing systems. Its core principles include connectivity for real-time communication among machines, systems, and humans; interoperability for seamless data exchange; advanced analytics for informed decision-making; and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) that merge computational intelligence with physical processes. Collectively, these elements enhance manufacturing efficiency, flexibility, and responsiveness (Isazaet al., 2019). Industry 4.0 technologies-CPS, IoT, AI, and cloud computing-are reshaping pharmaceuticals by enabling real-time monitoring, faster drug development, and improved production efficiency. AI-driven quality control supports innovation, while enhanced supply chain transparency ensures compliance. Adaptable systems enable personalized medicine, and resource-efficient processes promote sustainability.
Pharma 4.0 integrates IoT, AI, ML, Big Data, and blockchain to enhance efficiency, quality, and flexibility, unlike traditional systems that rely on manual processes and limited automation. Smart sensors and IoT enable real-time monitoring, while AI and ML support predictive maintenance and process optimization, reducing downtime. Advanced data systems enable timely decisions and quality control, with blockchain ensuring data integrity-contrasting with siloed, paper-based traditional setups. Continuous monitoring and predictive analytics improve quality assurance, replacing batch testing and delayed detection. Modular systems support personalized, small-batch production, unlike rigid traditional processes. Pharma 4.0 also enhances supply chain visibility and inventory optimization, while automation reduces labor dependence and shortens production cycles (Ding, 2018).
METHODOLOGY FOR LITERATURE REVIEW
The methodology for the literature review involved a thorough search across reputable databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. We focused on articles published between 2010 and 2024 that were highly relevant to Pharma 4.0, emphasizing process robustness, digital quality systems, and advanced manufacturing technologies. Our selection process restricted us to peer-reviewed sources, intentionally excluding publications from predatory journals. The review encompassed diverse document types such as original research articles, comprehensive review papers, case studies, and official regulatory guidance documents. To gather pertinent literature, we used key search terms like “Pharma 4.0,” “process robustness,” “PAT,” “QbD,” “digital transformation,” and “automation in pharmaceuticals.”
PHARMA 4.0
Pharma 4.0 represents the integration of Industry 4.0 principles into pharmaceutical manufacturing, using interconnected digital technologies to boost process reliability, uphold quality standards, and stay compliant with regulations. At the core of this shift is the Internet of Things (IoT), which allows for real-time monitoring of critical factors like temperature, humidity, and equipment health. IoT devices enable smooth data exchange with centralized databases, providing full visibility and quick detection of any deviations, which supports better process control (Mourtziset al., 2016). AI and Machine Learning (ML) build on this by analyzing the large datasets gathered through IoT. These technologies help predict equipment failures before they happen, allowing for proactive maintenance that reduces downtime and cuts operational costs (Kusiak, 2018). They also refine process parameters to improve quality and efficiency. Advanced analytics platforms bring together data from IoT devices, Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems in centralized locations. This setup offers actionable insights that support smarter decision-making, optimized processes, and compliance with regulations (Chenet al., 2015). Also, blockchain technology ensures data integrity by providing tamper-proof records and complete traceability, which is essential for compliance and recall readiness. Automation, especially through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), handles repetitive tasks like data entry and batch reporting. This reduces human errors and frees up staff to focus on more strategic work. AI and ML-powered systems can also adjust process parameters in real time, maintaining consistent quality with less human intervention. This agility makes it easier to switch production lines quickly and supports the increasing demand for personalized medicines (Mourtziset al., 2016). Emerging manufacturing techniques like continuous manufacturing and 3D printing are revolutionizing how medicines are produced. Continuous manufacturing offers higher efficiency, shorter production cycles, and lower contamination risks compared to traditional batch processes. Meanwhile, 3D printing enables fast prototyping and the creation of personalized medicines, improving treatment accuracy (Prasad and Smyth, 2016). At the core of Pharma 4.0 is the idea of data-driven decision making. Real-time analytics deliver immediate insights, helping to quickly correct issues and ensure consistent quality and operational efficiency. Predictive models also help align inventory and production with current demand, preventing overproduction or shortages. Risk management based on data can anticipate potential failures, allowing for preventative actions. Machine learning models, trained on historical and real-time information, assist in early detection of process deviations and support well-knowledgeable decisions through integrated decision-support systems. Finally, the combination of smart sensors, instant data sharing, and predictive analytics creates a responsive, intelligent manufacturing environment. Continuous data flow across production stages guarantees synchronized operations and ongoing compliance (Wuestet al., 2016). Smart sensors collect key environmental and operational data, enabling automated responses that reduce human error and promote consistency (Isazaet al., 2019). Predictive analytics identify patterns and anomalies, helping prevent failures and improving supply chain responsiveness (Peterson, 2020).
PROCESS ROBUSTNESS IN PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING
In Pharma 4.0, when we talk about process robustness, we’re referring to how well a manufacturing process can reliably produce high-quality pharmaceutical products even when faced with natural variations in raw materials or process conditions. Basically, a strong process is essential for making sure that the final product remains effective, safe for patients, and compliant with regulatory standards. It also helps cut costs by reducing waste, deviations, and rework (Yuet al., 2014). When processes are strong, they stay stable even if some inputs fluctuate, which means consistent therapeutic outcomes and greater operational flexibility (Nunavathet al., 2024; Xie and Schenkendorf, 2019). To evaluate how strong a process is, we look at Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)-those key properties like appearance, composition, and stability that directly affect safety and effectiveness. Monitoring CQAs helps guide how we control the process during manufacturing to keep quality standards high (Casinoet al., 2019).
Factors influencing Process Robustness
Alongside CQAs, we also focus on Critical Material Attributes (CMAs)–such as raw material particle size or moisture level–which need to stay within certain limits to ensure the product meets its targeted profile. The importance of each CMA can vary based on the formulation and downstream process sensitivities. Besides, Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) like mixing time, temperature, and pH must be carefully controlled to keep the final product consistent and prevent issues like impurities, yield loss, or variations in dosage form (Daveet al., 2015; Debnathet al., 2023).
Understanding the process also involves defining Normal Operating Ranges (NORs)–the typical parameter ranges during normal operation–and Proven Acceptable Ranges (PARs), which are established through validation and experimentation. A big difference between NOR and PAR suggests that the process is strong and less sensitive to fluctuations. Variability in pharma manufacturing can come from many sources, such as raw material quality, equipment calibration, environmental changes, sampling errors, or human factors. Among these, operator technique and consistency are particularly influential. Therefore, minimizing differences between operators is key to maintaining a stable and reliable process. To assess and improve robustness, professionals often use statistical tools and methodologies like Process Characterization Studies, Design of Experiments (DoE), Root Cause Analysis, Two One-Sided Tests (TOST), Generalized Mahalanobis Distance, multivariate analysis, and model-based experiments. These approaches help identify sources of variation, develop control strategies, and strengthen process reliability using quantitative data (Steinwandteret al., 2019).
Case Study
Case Study 1
Wells AS and Wong JW analyzed an API manufacturing process where equipment malfunction caused production deviation. A robust process design and real-time monitoring system identified the issue, enabling timely adjustments and resuming production without compromising API quality. This case highlights the importance of structured processes, efficient monitoring, and proactive issue resolution in maintaining product quality and regulatory compliance (Wellset al., 2016).
Case Study 2
A team developed a method using natural catalysts to form key intermediates for medicinal compounds. When scaling up, raw material quality variability affected compound reactions. A dynamic monitoring and control system was implemented to track real-time variations and apply corrective actions immediately, ensuring product quality despite changes in material. This case underscores the need for agility in process management to ensure consistent product quality.
Successful Mitigation of Process Deviation
Process Analytical Technology (PAT) plays a essential role in advancing pharmaceutical development and manufacturing by allowing real-time monitoring and Control of key Quality Attributes (CQAs). This helps ensure that products are consistently high in quality and meet regulatory standards. PAT includes important elements like continuous monitoring, multivariate data analysis, and alignment with Quality by Design (QbD) principles, all supporting reliable, data-driven decision-making. Techniques such as chemometrics are used to extract meaningful insights from complex data, which enhances our understanding of processes and improves performance (Yu and Kopcha, 2017).
By identifying sources of variability early on, PAT encourages ongoing improvement and enables proactive corrections. When addressing deviations, a structured five-step process is followed: pinpointing the issue, assessing the process, analyzing data, implementing corrective measures, and maintaining the improvements. This systematic approach helps reduce variability from raw materials and operational factors, leading to more dependable and efficient pharmaceutical manufacturing.
INTEGRATION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES
Integrating Industry 4.0 Technologies into Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Bringing Industry 4.0 technologies into the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector has greatly changed how processes are controlled, how efficient they are, and how well they meet regulatory standards. The Internet of Things (IoT) plays a critical role by providing real-time data on key parameters throughout the manufacturing process. For example, in cold chain logistics, IoT devices help ensure temperature-sensitive medicines stay within safe limits, safeguarding product quality. Inside production facilities, IoT continuously monitors factors like pressure, humidity, and equipment health, aiding compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and reducing unexpected shutdowns through predictive maintenance. On the supply side, IoT enhances traceability, fighting counterfeiting and improving inventory management. What’s more, patient-focused technologies such as wearable devices enable remote health monitoring, supporting personalized treatment plans (Miorandiet al., 2012; Riazul Islamet al., 2015).
Cloud platforms workhand in hand with IoT by collecting data from various devices and consolidating it into a single, accessible environment. These platforms provide scalable storage solutions and use advanced analytics powered by AI and Machine Learning (ML), turning raw data into valuable insights. This data-driven approach helps optimize research, manufacturing, and distribution processes, enabling fast, knowledgeable decisions while maintaining data security and regulatory compliance across different jurisdictions (Dinhet al., 2013).
Big data analytics further boosts manufacturing capabilities by allowing real-time quality checks, process improvements, and predictive maintenance. These tools help reduce variability, boost yields, and cut costs. Predictive models can forecast equipment failures and determine when maintenance is needed, which minimizes downtime. They also support regulatory adherence by detecting anomalies, maintaining electronic records, and simplifying reporting. Besides, big data enhances logistics by reducing waste and ensuring timely delivery of products (Jagadishet al., 2014; Waller and Fawcett, 2013).
Predictive modeling is also transforming drug discovery, clinical trials, and manufacturing processes, helping teams take proactive steps to control quality. Automated anomaly detection reinforces quality assurance by catching issues early, while digital quality control ensures compliance with GMP and various regulations (Peterson, 2020).
Automation and robotics are key to ensuring consistent production quality and minimizing human errors. Robots efficiently handle repetitive tasks with high accuracy, lowering the risk of contamination and maintaining product consistency. Data collected in real time from robotic systems helps spot deviations early, supporting quality control efforts. Collaborative robots (cobots) work side-by-side with human operators, providing ergonomic support and adaptive feedback, which helps reduce errors and enhance overall production reliability (Melissa, 2023).
Smart sensors integrated with IoT deliver high-resolution, real-time data on conditions like temperature, pressure, and composition. This data feeds into predictive maintenance systems and enables energetic adjustments in the process, leading to better compliance and operational efficiency (Taoet al., 2018).
Closed-loop feedback mechanisms use sensor data to automatically control process variables, reducing variability, minimizing waste, and decreasing manual intervention. While these systems require major investment and complexity to implement, they greatly improve consistency, accuracy, and responsiveness in pharmaceutical manufacturing (Singhet al., 2014).
IMPACT OF PHARMA 4.0 ON QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, AND COST OPTIMISATION
Pharma 4.0 is revolutionizing the pharmaceutical industry by using advanced technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), AI, robotics, and cloud computing. This innovative approach is transforming manufacturing processes to improve quality, boost efficiency, and reduce costs. By digitizing entire value chains and prioritizing cybersecurity, Pharma 4.0 paves the way for developing smart factories. AI-powered tools such as machine vision, predictive maintenance, and automated quality control are making decision-making more accurate and processes more reliable. These technologies support key industry principles like Quality by Design (QbD) and Real-Time Release Testing (RTRT) by continuously monitoring Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). This ensures products consistently meet quality standards and comply with regulations (Pedroet al., 2023).
Efficiency is further enhanced through cyber-physical systems and automation, which optimize RandD efforts, optimize resource use, and improve safety across operations. These innovations lead to higher throughput, fewer mistakes caused by human error, and less need for manual work (Hariryet al., 2020).
Cost savings are achieved through better planning, quicker time-to-market, lower energy usage, and less material waste. Also, big data analytics and 3D printing help refine lead times and allocate resources more effectively (Bhojneyet al., 2024; Hariryet al., 2020).
At the end of the day, transitioning digital technologies into business operations delivers major return on investment by reducing operational costs, maintaining high-quality standards, ensuring data integrity, and enhancing worker productivity through smart systems (Misra, 2022; Rezepa, 2021).
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE
Pharma 4.0 integrates machine learning, in silico modeling, and 3D printing, presenting regulatory challenges in validation, security, and compliance. Regulators are adapting frameworks to support innovation while ensuring safety and quality (Malheiroet al., 2023).
AI and robotics must comply with GxP standards-GMP for manufacturing, GLP for non-clinical studies, and GCP for clinical trials. Agencies like the FDA and EMA are incorporating digital tools into compliance practices. Validating digital systems ensures accuracy, compliance, and reliability under all conditions, as emphasized by GAMP 5. User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and change control maintain validation, while detailed documentation is essential. Regulations like 21 CFR Part 11 govern electronic records, ensuring data authenticity and integrity. Pharma 4.0 process validation includes Design, Qualification, and Continued Verification stages. Digital validation supports continuous compliance and flexibility using agile methods (Ardenet al., 2021; Pedroet al., 2023). With expanding big data and cloud systems, securing data integrity, particularly with AI-driven decisions, is critical. Best practices include algorithm transparency, audit trails, e-signatures, and secure storage. The ALCOA principles ensure data traceability and integrity.(Lealet al., 2021; Manzano and Langer, 2018) Strong security measures-encryption, access control, and audit trails-protect sensitive data and support legal compliance. Regular risk assessments, training, and encryption prevent breaches and ensure regulatory alignment, including HIPAA. PAT ensures GMP compliance and data integrity by securing accurate data across processes. GAMP-S and FDA Part 11 compliance ensure that computerized systems meet regulatory standards for electronic records and signatures (Barenjiet al., 2019).
CONCLUSION
Pharma Industry 4.0 is transforming the sector with sustainable, smart, and personalized technologies, providing a competitive edge. A sustainable Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (PSC) is essential for future operations. Tools like Auto-ID, smart vehicles, cloud computing, and analytics enable personalized medicine by analyzing biometric data and adherence. Gene technology advances drug design, while Process Analytical Technology (PAT) allows real-time quality monitoring without disrupting production. 3D printing supports small-scale, customized drug manufacturing. AI and machine learning optimize processes, support real-time release, and improve GxP compliance with FDA and EMA standards. Big data and ML enhance operations by predicting trends and optimizing processes (Manzano and Langer, 2018).
AI advances drug modeling, repurposing, and delivery, tailoring pharmacokinetics to individuals. However, inconsistent databases limit broader application. Deep learning improves robotics and late-stage development, enhancing quality and life cycle management (Colombo, 2020).
Collaboration among academia, industry, and regulators is essential for innovation, safety, and efficacy. Joint efforts through research, design thinking, working groups, conferences, and internships drive development and regulation. Digital platforms further facilitate communication and data sharing. To strengthen collaboration, academia should engage more with industry, and regulators can support stipend projects and guided research. Connections with CROs and global pharma companies will also enhance RandD and knowledge exchange (Debnathet al., 2023; Mubaraket al., 2024).
Moving forward, it’s important that further research focuses on developing standardized validation frameworks for AI tools, finding scalable ways to integrate these technologies into small and medium-sized enterprises, and carefully considering the ethical implications of automated decision-making. There are still some key questions to answer, like how to make machine learning algorithms more transparent and how to strike the right balance between promoting innovation and adhering to regulatory standards. Addressing these issues will be critical in building manufacturing systems that are not only resilient and adaptable but also centered around patient needs.
Cite this article:
Balam R, Mahesh P, Gandhi K, Poojary SG, Chandran A, Vadakkepushpakath AN. Pharma 4.0: Enhancing Process Robustness in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing through Industry 4.0 Integration. J Young Pharm. 2025;17(4):784-9.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors express their gratitude to the management of Nitte (Deemed to be University) for their support in conducting the literature search and writing this manuscript.
ABBREVIATIONS
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
|---|---|
| API | Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient; CMA: Critical Material Attribute |
| CQA | Critical Quality Attribute |
| CPP | Critical Process Parameter |
| CPS | Cyber-Physical System |
| ERP | Enterprise Resource Planning |
| FDA | Food and Drug Administration |
| GLP | Good Laboratory Practice |
| GMP | Good Manufacturing Practice |
| GCP | Good Clinical Practice |
| GxP | Good Practice |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| LIMS | Laboratory Information Management System |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| NOR | Normal Operating Range |
| ORCID | Open Researcher and Contributor ID |
| PAR | Proven Acceptable Range |
| PAT | Process Analytical Technology |
| PSC | Pharmaceutical Supply Chain |
| QbD | Quality by Design |
| QTPP | Quality Target Product Profile |
| RPA | Robotic Process Automation |
| RTRT | Real-Time Release Testing |
| UAT | User Acceptance Testing |
References
- Arden N. S., Fisher A. C., Tyner K., Yu L. X., Lee S. L., Kopcha M., et al. (2021) Industry 4.0 for pharmaceutical manufacturing: Preparing for the smart factories of the future.. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 602: Article 120554 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120554 | Google Scholar
- Barenji R. V., Akdag Y., Yet B., Oner L.. (2019) Cyber-physical-based PAT (CPbPAT) framework for Pharma 4.0.. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 567: Article 118445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.036 | Google Scholar
- Bhojney N., Hardenia S., Jain D. K.. (2024) Role of atomization in pharmaceutical industries.. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Drug Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.036 | Google Scholar
- Casino F., Dasaklis T. K., Patsakis C.. (2019) A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues.. Telematics and Informatics 36: 55-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006 | Google Scholar
- Chen C.-M., Delmas M. A., Lieberman M. B.. (2015) Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research: Production Frontier Methodologies in Strategic Management Research.. Strategic Management Journal 36: 19-36 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2199 | Google Scholar
- Colombo S.. (2020) In Artificial intelligence in healthcare : 85-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00004-6 | Google Scholar
- Dave V. S., Saoji S. D., Raut N. A., Haware R. V.. (2015) Excipient variability and its impact on dosage form functionality.. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 104: 906-915 https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24299 | Google Scholar
- Debnath B., Shakur M. S., Bari A. B. M. M., Saha J., Porna W. A., Mishu M. J., Islam A. R. M. T., Rahman M. A., et al. (2023) Assessing the critical success factors for implementing industry 4.0 in the pharmaceutical industry: Implications for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies.. PLOS One 18: Article e0287149 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287149 | Google Scholar
- Ding B.. (2018) Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains.. In Process Safety and Environmental Protection 119: 115-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.031 | Google Scholar
- Dinh H. T., Lee C., Niyato D., Wang P.. (2013) A survey of mobile cloud computing: Architecture, applications, and approaches.. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 13: 1587-1611 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.1203 | Google Scholar
- Hariry R. E., Barenji R. V., Paradkar A.Hussain C. M., Di Sia P., et al. (2020) Handbook of smart materials, technologies, and devices : 1-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_4-1 | Google Scholar
- Isaza G. A., Rahman M. M., Sarkar D., Rachuri S.. (2019) Smart manufacturing for pharmaceuticals.. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation 14: 85-93 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-018-9345-y | Google Scholar
- Jagadish H. V., Gehrke J., Labrinidis A., Papakonstantinou Y., Patel J. M., Ramakrishnan R., Shahabi C., et al. (2014) Big data and its technical challenges.. Communications of the ACM 57: 86-94 https://doi.org/10.1145/2611567 | Google Scholar
- Kusiak A.. (2018) Smart manufacturing.. International Journal of Production Research 56: 508-517 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 | Google Scholar
- Leal F., Chis A. E., Caton S., González-Vélez H., García-Gómez J. M., Durá M., Mier M., Sáez C., Karageorgos A., Gerogiannis V. C., Xenakis A., Lallas E., Ntounas T., Vasileiou E., Mountzouris G., Otti B., Pucci P., Papini R., Cerrai D., Mier M., et al. (2021) Smart pharmaceutical manufacturing: Ensuring end-to-end traceability and data integrity in medicine production.. Big Data Research 24: Article 100172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100172 | Google Scholar
- Malheiro V., Duarte J., Veiga F., Mascarenhas-Melo F.. (2023) Exploiting Pharma 4.0 technologies in the non-biological complex drugs manufacturing: Innovations and implications.. Pharmaceutics 15: 2545 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112545 | Google Scholar
- Manzano T., Langer G.. (2018) Getting ready for pharma 4.0.. Pharmaceutical Engineering 38: 72-79 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112545 | Google Scholar
- Melissa R.. (2023) The use of collaborative robots in pharmaceutical industry will grow at a 14% CAGR.. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15112545 | Google Scholar
- Miorandi D., Sicari S., De Pellegrini F., Chlamtac I.. (2012) Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges.. Ad Hoc Networks 10: 1497-1516 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 | Google Scholar
- Misra S.. (2022) Optimizing the digitization of tech transfer and scale-up for Pharma 4.0.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 | Google Scholar
- Mourtzis D., Vlachou E., Milas N.. (2016) Industrial big data as a result of IoT adoption in manufacturing.. Procedia CIRP 55: 290-295 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.038 | Google Scholar
- Mubarak Z., Abbas N., Hashmi F. K., Husnain S. Z., Bukhari N. I.. (2024) Academia-pharmaceutical industry linkage: An academic perspective.. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 17(4): Article 2332872 https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2332872 | Google Scholar
- Nunavath R. S., Singh M. T., Jain A., Chakma M., Arivuselvam R., Azeeze M. S. T. A., et al. (2024) Quality by design in pharmaceuticals: A review of its impact on regulatory compliance and product quality.. Drug Research 74: 18-23 https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2185-4916 | Google Scholar
- Pedro F., Veiga F., Mascarenhas-Melo F.. (2023) Impact of GAMP 5, data integrity and QbD on quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry: How obvious is it?. Drug Discovery Today 28: Article 103759 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103759 | Google Scholar
- Peterson J.. (2020) Applications of predictive analytics in pharmaceutical industries.. Int. J. Adv. Res Sci. Eng. Technol. 7: 13059-13063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103759 | Google Scholar
- Prasad L. K., Smyth H.. (2016) 3D Printing technologies for drug delivery: A review.. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 42: 1019-1031 https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743 | Google Scholar
- Reinhardt M., Ali R., Eliasson L., Hoofman S., Geissler B.. (2018) Pharma. 4.0: The journey toward the future of pharmaceuticals.. Pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutical Engineering 38: 22-29 https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743 | Google Scholar
- Rezepa S.. (2021) Strategy and Planning and Implementation and Impact for the Pharmaceutical Industry with and by industry 4.0. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743 | Google Scholar
- Riazul Islam S. M., Kwak D., Humaun Kabir M., Hossain M., Kwak K.-S.. (2015) The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey.. IEEE Access 3: 678-708 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951 | Google Scholar
- Singh R., Barrasso D., Chaudhury A., Sen M., Ierapetritou M., Ramachandran R., et al. (2014) Closed-loop feedback control of a continuous pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process via wet granulation.. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation 9: 16-37 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-014-9170-9 | Google Scholar
- Steinwandter V., Borchert D., Herwig C.. (2019) Data science tools and applications on the way to Pharma 4.0.. Drug Discovery Today 24: 1795-1805 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.005 | Google Scholar
- Tao F., Qi Q., Liu A., Kusiak A.. (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing.. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48: 157-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006 | Google Scholar
- Waller M. A., Fawcett S. E.. (2013) Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management.. Journal of Business Logistics 34: 77-84 https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12010 | Google Scholar
- Wells A. S., Wong J. W., Michels P. C., Entwistle D. A., Fandrick K., Finch G. L., Goswami A., Lee H., Mix S., Moody T. S., Pang L., Sato R. K., Turner N. J., Watson T. J., et al. (2016) Case studies illustrating a science and risk-based approach to ensuring drug quality when using enzymes in the manufacture of active pharmaceuticals ingredients for oral dosage form.. Organic Process Research and Development 20: 594-601 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00369 | Google Scholar
- Wuest T., Weimer D., Irgens C., Thoben K.-D.. (2016) Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications.. Production and Manufacturing Research 4: 23-45 https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2016.1192517 | Google Scholar
- Xie X., Schenkendorf R.. (2019) Robust process design in pharmaceutical manufacturing under batch-to-batch variation.. Processes 7: 509 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7080509 | Google Scholar
- Yu L. X., Amidon G., Khan M. A., Hoag S. W., Polli J., Raju G. K., Woodcock J., et al. (2014) Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design.. The AAPS Journal 16: 771-783 https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9598-3 | Google Scholar
- Yu L. X., Kopcha M.. (2017) The future of pharmaceutical quality and the path to get there.. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 528: 354-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.039 | Google Scholar