ABSTRACT
Background
Microbial bioload control in clean rooms is critical for ensuring pharmaceutical product quality. Regular monitoring and effective disinfection practices are essential to minimize contamination risks. This study aimed to identify and analyze microbial contamination in clean rooms across different seasons using MALDI TOF MS for rapid microbial identification.
Materials and Methods
Microbial samples were collected pre- and post-fogging from a NABL-accredited cleanroom using settle plates and active air sampling methods. The fogging was performed with a QUAT-based disinfectant. Samples were analyzed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI TOF MS) for rapid and reliable identification of microbial species. The study was conducted across three seasonal periods-summer, monsoon, and winter-to assess seasonal variation in microbial contamination.
Results
MALDI TOF MS identified common microbial contaminants such as Pseudomonas stutzeri, Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus spp., and Micrococci spp. Significant seasonal variations were observed in microbial populations. Post-fogging, the microbial load was reduced by approximately 90% during the monsoon, 40% in summer, and 57% in winter. The identification process using MALDI TOF MS allowed for rapid and reliable analysis of the cleanroom microbial environment.
Conclusion
MALDI TOF MS proved effective for quick and accurate identification of cleanroom microbial contaminants. The QUAT-based fogging process effectively reduced microbial loads, though efficacy varied seasonally. Regular monitoring, coupled with rotational disinfectant use, supports enhanced contamination control strategies in pharmaceutical cleanroom environments.
INTRODUCTION
The microbiological bioload in a laboratory’s clean room environment is essential for guaranteeing the safety and quality of product testing across sectors, including medicines and food processing. Effective monitoring and identification of microbial contaminants not only safeguard product integrity but also uphold public health standards (Gerba, C. and Pepper, L. 2019). At pharmaceutical the clean rooms are designed to minimize the presence of particulate and microbial contaminants (Rizwan, M.,et al.,2022). Its maintenance and regulation is governed by various standards and guidelines like ISO, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter <1116>. Apart from this EMA also provides guidelines for clean room classification and monitoring, emphasizing the need for regular environmental monitoring to ensure compliance with cGMP standards (Berthod, F.et al.,2020).
However, despite stringent controls, contamination can still occur from several sources. Out of which personnel are often considered the primary source, as humans shed skin cells, hair, and other particulates that can carry microorganisms. Studies have shown that even with the use of cleanroom garments, and regular cleaning and disinfection, significant levels of microbial contamination can originate (Verbeek, J. Het al.,2020). Moreover the airborne microorganisms are considered as major threat due to their ability to settle on surfaces, equipment, and products, posing a significant risk of contamination (Masotti, F.et al.,2019; Mohammed, S., and Balogu, T. 2023; Chai, J.,et al.,2018). Additionally, environmental factors such as airflow, humidity, and temperature also play crucial roles in microbial contamination.
Therefore, regular Environmental Monitoring (EM) is required to maintain the clean room. This process involves systematically collecting and analyzing samples from air, surfaces, and personnel to detect and quantify microbial contamination. Periodic EM, provides data that can be used to identify microbial trends, potential contamination sources, and need for potential improvement. Monitoring data can be used to identify seasonal trends and implement proactive measures to mitigate the risk of contamination (Bourdichon, F.et al., 2021). Despite the advances in clean room technology and environmental monitoring, challenges remain in getting the rapid analysis of microbial load for instant actions (Das, A. K., 2023).
MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable tool for identifying bacterial species as it analyses the molecular spectra of bacterial cells. The procedure is expedited relative to existing approaches, requiring less than 5 min to acquire a spectrum and validate it against a reference library, which is, on average, 1.45 days swifter than conventional techniques for detecting bacterial isolates. In a clinical context, the utilization of MALDI-TOF MS identification has been shown to reduce patient mortality due to the swift identification process and aids in lowering the expenses associated with standard microbiological recognition (Elbehiry, A.,et al.,2022). MALDI-TOF MS recognition is both quick and reportedly very accurate. More than 90% of Gram-positive strains were accurately identified using a MALDI-TOF MS system in comparison to molecular approaches, while around 90% of Gram-negative strains were correctly determined to at least a genus level in a clinical context involving humans (Torres-Sangiao,et al.,2021).
The current study aims to assess the efficacy of MALDI-TOF MS in the context of microbiological monitoring within NABL-accredited pharmaceutical testing laboratories. The research assesses the utility of this instrument in detecting airborne contamination rapidly, thereby contributing to the optimization of cleanroom monitoring protocols. By enhancing our understanding of microbial dynamics within clean room environments and refining monitoring strategies, this research seeks to support pharmaceutical manufacturing processes, uphold product quality, and strengthen regulatory compliance efforts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chosen areas
This study aims to isolate, characterize, and identify microorganisms through microbial monitoring at a pharmaceutical testing laboratory accredited to NABL, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standards located in the Mumbai suburb region, Maharashtra, India. The environment monitoring sampling was conducted within the laboratory’s cleanrooms. The area was thoroughly inspected, and all doors were securely closed to maintain a controlled environment before the fogging. A quaternary ammonium compound (QUAT)-based disinfectant was used by diluting it with water at a ratio of 1:15. The diluted disinfectant solution was then added to the fogger machine’s tank, which was placed in a corner of the cleanroom. According to EPA guidelines, the fogging process was conducted for 20 min to ensure comprehensive distribution of the disinfectant. Following the fogging, the area was left undisturbed for an additional 30 min to allow the disinfectant to settle and achieve effective sterilization. Microbial samples were collected across three different seasons (summer, monsoon, and winter), both before and after fogging, to assess the microbial load within the cleanroom. This approach provided a quantitative measure of airborne microbial contamination in the cleanroom across different seasons.
Microbiological methods
Settle plate
The settle plate method (Pasquarella, C. et al., 2000) was used with few modifications, involving exposing sterile agar plates. Soybean-Casein Digest Agar (SCDA) and Potato Dextrose Agar with chloramphenicol (PDAc) was exposed in the cleanroom at a height of approximately one meter above the floor in an upright position. The lids were kept open, in the center of the designated sampling areas for a duration of 20 min. The locations and start times of the exposures were meticulously recorded. The procedure was carried out both before and after fogging with a QUAT-based disinfectant to evaluate the effectiveness of the disinfection process. The PCA plates were incubated at 30-35ºC for 24-48 hr, while the PDAc plates were incubated at 20-25ºC for 5 days. Following incubation, colonies were counted and recorded as CFU per plate.
Air sampling
The air sampling method (Pitt, J.I. and Hocking, A.D. 1999) was used with few modifications, by positioning the air sampler at approximately one meter above the floor to simulate typical human exposure levels. Sampling locations were strategically selected to represent critical areas within the cleanroom, including high-traffic zones. Sterile SCDA and PDAc were utilized as the culture media for microbial collection. This procedure was carried out both before and after fogging with a QUAT-based disinfectant to evaluate the effectiveness of the disinfection process. The air sampler was set to operate for 5-15 min, upon completion of the sampling period, the agar plates were carefully removed, sealed to prevent contamination, and labelled with pertinent information such as date, time, and sampling location. The PCA plates were incubated at 30-35ºC for 24-48 hr, while the PDAc plates were incubated at 20-25ºC for 5 days. After incubation, colonies were counted and recorded as CFU/m3 of air sampled.
Microbial identification
MALDI-TOF MS technique
Microbial species identification was conducted using MALDI-TOF MS (Himedia), employing a metal reusable target slide. Before analysis, microbial samples were prepared by direct deposit method and applied to the target slide. A solitary colony was applied to the designated slide to create a uniform smear, followed by treatment with the prepared matrix solution, featuring HCCA as the primary ingredient. Following ambient temperature drying, the target slide was placed into the hatch of the MALDI-TOF MS machine. Data acquisition was performed using the Autof Acquirer software, optimizing parameters such as laser intensity and number of shots for each sample. Subsequently, acquired spectra were analyzed using the latest version of Autof Analyzer software, where spectral patterns were compared against a comprehensive reference database to ascertain microbial species. A score >9.0 is considered highly reliable at the species level, whereas scores below 6.0 are considered indicative of unidentified isolates. Calibration of the system was routinely performed using an Autobio calibrating agent to ensure accuracy and consistency of results. The clear peaks were studied and based on the reliable score the identification was done.
RESULTS
Microbial identification using MALDI TOF MAS revealed the presence of various microbial species in all different seasons. Forty-seven bacterial isolates were from the clean room were subjected to identification. The results showed that the MALDI-TOF MAS analysis was effective, with score more than nine that is considered reliable. Out of all the strains, about thirty-three isolates are identified upto genus level. The common isolates included Pseudomonas stutzeri and Staphylococcus spp. Bacillus spp. Micrococci spp., Kocuria spp. etc. The Pseudomonas stutzeri dominated in all seasons and Staphylococcus had variety of species (Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus arlettae, and Staphylococcus capitis), followed by Bacillus spp. (Bacillus altitudinis, Bacillus oceanisediminis, Bacillus megaterium), Kocuria spp. (Kocuria rhizophila, Kocuria marina, Kocuria varians). The mass spectra revealed intricate assemblies of distinct ions with m/z ratios spanning from 2000 to 10,000. Table 1 presents the peak masses of 12 Pseudomonas stutzeri strains, with the peaks emphasized in bold representing those obtained by the majority of the strains also represented in Figure 1. The produced peaks exhibit significant intensity, enabling the identification of biomarkers, as evidenced by the peaks at 4415 and 5559 m/z.

Figure 1:
Spectral fingerprints obtained from various strains of Pseudomonas stutzeri sing HCCA matrix.
| Strain code | SPB01PR | SPB02PR | SPB06PR | ASB01PR | ASB05PR | SPB01PO | SPB02PO | SPB06PO | ASB06PO | SPB05PO | ASB01PO | ASB02PO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| m/z | 3633 | 2208 | 2790 | 2754 | 2983 | 3635 | 2069 | 3077 | 2603 | 3478 | 2750 | 2750 |
| 4124 | 3649 | 3311 | 3076 | 3227 | 3772 | 3775 | 3555 | 3612 | 3639 | 3477 | 3079 | |
| 4134 | 3772 | 3667 | 4132 | 4221 | 4125 | 4135 | 4133 | 4143 | 4112 | 4158 | 4126 | |
| 4144 | 4133 | 4132 | 4151 | 4387 | 4136 | 4394 | 4153 | 4400 | 4128 | 4392 | 4391 | |
| 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | 4415 | |
| 4434 | 4436 | 4443 | 4435 | 4432 | 4437 | 4439 | 4437 | 4436 | 4601 | 4439 | 4438 | |
| 4938 | 4941 | 4940 | 4532 | 4468 | 4446 | 4601 | 4939 | 4456 | 5082 | 4600 | 4456 | |
| 4996 | 4998 | 5078 | 4597 | 4486 | 5080 | 4943 | 4998 | 4939 | 5094 | 4633 | 4600 | |
| 5077 | 5079 | 5135 | 4938 | 4530 | 5090 | 4961 | 5079 | 4997 | 5644 | 4943 | 4633 | |
| 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5665 | 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5659 | 5663 | |
| 5673 | 5704 | 5677 | 6155 | 5700 | 7113 | 5976 | 5973 | 5675 | 6091 | 5976 | 6091 | |
| 6155 | 5960 | 5958 | 7111 | 5966 | 7273 | 6446 | 6090 | 5693 | 6435 | 6161 | 6160 | |
| 7110 | 5973 | 5972 | 7269 | 6230 | 7295 | 6466 | 6141 | 5957 | 6957 | 6240 | 6239 | |
| 7269 | 6462 | 6010 | 7298 | 6455 | 7311 | 7274 | 6158 | 5972 | 6996 | 6436 | 6588 |
Similarly, Figure 2 shows peak masses of 5 strains of Bacillus and 2 strains of Paenibacillus, which are closely related thus showing the similarity in protein peaks. The peak intensity of Paenibacillus and Bacillus are recorded at m/z of 7150, which are similar. Consequently, these identified peaks are considered specific biomarkers for the recognized genera present in the database. This indicates that these two protein peaks may serve as potential species-specific biomarkers for Bacillus.

Figure 2:
Spectral fingerprints obtained from various strains of Bacillus and Paenibacillus using HCCA matrix.
In the summer season, a variety of bacterial species were identified pre and post-fogging. The genera and the total bacterial and fungal CFU/m3 were isolated from the cleanroom during the summer seasons pre- and post-fogging using the settle plate and air sampling method. Most of the sample had scores above nine.
The microbial population detected from the cleanroom in the summer season consisted mainly of bacteria from the genera Staphylococcus sp, Pseudomonas sp, Micrococcus sp and Bacillus sp. The microbes isolated from the settle plate identified four different microbial species that had reliable scores that is more than 9.0 which is credible up to species and subspecies level whereas Paenibacillus glucanolyticus scored between 6-9 which is credible up to species level. The air sampling identified five microbial species that had reliable scores that are more than 9.0 which is credible up to species and subspecies level. Post fogging there was a significant reduction in microbial growth (Table 3).
| Bacillus | Paenibacillus | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain code | ASB06PR | SPB04PO | ASB06PO | SPB03PR | SPB07PRR | ASB05PO | ASB06PO |
| 2210 | 2164 | 2540 | 3071 | 2580 | 3064 | 3448 | |
| 2231 | 2567 | 2562 | 3706 | 2589 | 3091 | 3502 | |
| 4343 | 3192 | 4694 | 5228 | 3404 | 5094 | 4845 | |
| 5167 | 5167 | 5167 | 5247 | 3478 | 5156 | 5151 | |
| 5190 | 5212 | 5207 | 5362 | 3545 | 5176 | 5176 | |
| m/z | 5206 | 5253 | 5226 | 6143 | 3576 | 5196 | 5395 |
| 5225 | 5608 | 5245 | 7087 | 10054 | 6682 | 6522 | |
| 5531 | 5622 | 5813 | 7115 | 10411 | 6778 | 6633 | |
| 5796 | 5660 | 5833 | 7150 | 10455 | 7150 | 6649 | |
| 5817 | 5791 | 5871 | 7174 | 10492 | 7191 | 6741 | |
| 5832 | 6312 | 6398 | 7193 | 7580 | 6761 | ||
| 5869 | 6326 | 6516 | 7212 | 7657 | 6903 | ||
| 6262 | 6348 | 6534 | 7234 | 7708 | 6955 | ||
| 6396 | 6385 | 6562 | 7508 | 7748 | 6992 | ||
| Identified organism | Settle plate | Air sampling | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | |
| Pseudomonas stutzeri | 9.325 | 9.101 | 9.088 | 9.191 |
| Staphylococcus hominis | 9.588 | – | – | 9.208 |
| Staphylococcus haemolyticus | – | – | 9.076 | – |
| Staphylococcus warneri | – | 9.067 | – | – |
| Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum | 9.076 | – | – | – |
| Kocuria rhizophila | – | – | 9.262 | – |
| Kocuria marina | – | 9.502 | – | – |
| Micrococcus luteus | – | – | – | 9.243 |
| Paenibacillus glucanolyticus | 6.796 | – | 6.809 | – |
| Bacillus oceanisediminis | – | 9.13 | – | – |
| Bacillus megaterium | – | – | 9.503 | 9.5 |
On the other hand, during the monsoon season, the settle plate method identified six different microbial species, including Staphylococcus sp., Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Kodamaea sp. and Moraxella sp. with scores more than 9 whereas Curtobacterium sp had score between 6-9. The microbial load was reduced after fogging, with the identified spices. In comparison, air sampling identified five microbial species of Pseudomonas sp, Staphylococcus sp, and Kodamaea sp. before fogging and consistency of Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus sp., remained with lesser microbial load and a new strain was found of Moraxella osloensis as illustrated in (Table 4).
| Identified organism | Settle plate | Air sampling | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | |
| Pseudomonas stutzeri | 9.069 | 9.042 | 9.226 | 9.165 |
| Staphylococcus hominis | 9.588 | – | 9.047 | |
| Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 9.077 | – | – | – |
| Staphylococcus warneri | – | 9.108 | – | – |
| Staphylococcus saprophyticus | 9.031 | – | – | 6.034 |
| Bacillus altitudinis | 9.17 | – | – | – |
| Staphylococcus aureus | – | – | 9.093 | – |
| Staphylococcus arlettae | – | 6.652 | 9.33 | – |
| Curtobacterium sp. | 7.756 | – | – | – |
| Kodamaea ohmeri | – | – | 9.108 | – |
| Staphylococcus capitis | – | – | – | 9.00 |
| Moraxella osloensis | – | – | – | 9.064 |
In the winter season, there was a reduction in the number of species identified in both settle plates and air samples post-fumigation. The settle plate method identified three microbial species of Pseudomonas sp, Staphylococcus sp., and Micrococcus spp., with multiple colonies noted for some species. In comparison, air sampling identified six microbial species of Pseudomonas sp, Staphylococcus sp, Micrococcus spp., Bacillus sp, and Janibacter sp, also with multiple colonies noted for some species. After the fogging process settle plate reported three species of Micrococcus spp., Kocuria sp. and Staphylococcus sp., whereas the air sampling reported the presence of Staphylococcus sp. and Janibacter indicus (Table 5).
| Identified organism | Settle plate | Air sampling | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | Pre- fogging | Post-fogging | |
| Pseudomonas stutzeri | 9.066 | – | 9.231 | – |
| Staphylococcus hominis | – | 9.095 | – | |
| Staphylococcus cohnii | 9.101 | – | – | – |
| Staphylococcus warneri | 9.002 | – | – | 9.325 |
| Staphylococcus sciuri | – | – | 9.026 | – |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | – | – | – | 9.095 |
| Kocuria varians | – | 9.502 | – | – |
| Janibacter indicus | – | – | 8.281 | 8.452 |
| Bacillus megaterium | – | – | 9.244 | – |
| Staphylococcus capitis | – | – | 9.058 | – |
In air sampling, the fogging process resulted in a 6% and 17% reduction in microbial load reduction in summer, and winter season respectively. This minimal reduction suggests that the QUAT-based disinfectant used may be less effective under the environmental conditions typical of summer, such as higher temperatures and potentially lower humidity. The mean microbial count was 15.5, indicating a relatively stable microbial load before and after fogging (Table 6). The low SD reflects low variability in the microbial counts, suggesting that the microbial population was fairly consistent across samples and the SE indicates a small margin of error in the mean estimate, reinforcing the stability of the microbial counts during this season. On the other hand, a significant 50% reduction in microbial load was observed during the monsoon season. This substantial decrease suggests that the fogging process is particularly effective. The mean microbial count was 21.0, the highest among the seasons studied, indicating a higher initial microbial load before fogging and the SD shows high variability in microbial counts, suggesting fluctuating environmental conditions and microbial populations (Table 7).
| Seasons | Percentage Reduction | Mean | Standard deviation | (CFU/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summer | 6 | 15.5 | 0.707 | <50 |
| Monsoon | 50 | 21.0 | 9.899 | <50 |
| Winter | 17 | 15.5 | 2.121 | <50 |
| Season | Percentage Reduction | Mean | Standard deviation | (CFU/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summer | 40 | 21.5 | 7.78 | <50 |
| Monsoon | 90 | 17.5 | 20.51 | <50 |
| Winter | 57 | 10.0 | 5.66 | <50 |
In the Settle plate, the fogging process resulted in a reduction of 40% in summer, and 57% in microbial load during the winter season. This moderate reduction suggests that the QUAT-based disinfectant used has a reasonable level of effectiveness under environmental conditions. The mean microbial count indicates a relatively high baseline microbial load before fogging. The SD reflects moderate variability in the microbial counts, suggesting some fluctuation in the microbial population across samples. The SE indicates a moderate margin of error in the mean estimate, reinforcing the variability observed during this season.
During monsoon season a substantial 90% reduction in microbial load was observed during the monsoon season. This significant decrease suggests that the fogging process is highly effective under the high humidity conditions of the monsoon season, which may enhance the efficacy of the QUAT-based disinfectant. The mean microbial count was 17.5, lower than the summer season but still indicating a relatively high initial microbial load before fogging. The SD of 20.51 shows very high variability in microbial counts, suggesting considerable fluctuations in environmental conditions and microbial populations. The SE of 14.50 indicates a large margin of error in the mean estimate, which could be due to the inherent variability in environmental conditions during the monsoon.
DISCUSSION
This study highlights the application of MALDI-TOF MS as a rapid and reliable technique for identifying airborne microbial contaminants in pharmaceutical cleanrooms and underscores the significant impact of seasonal variation on microbial presence. MALDI-TOF MS is based on the measurement of microbial proteins that are generally well-conserved within a species. Consequently, it offers a more dependable method for identifying species at the level of specificity. The FDA has approved the MALDI Biotyper for identifying species groups, allowing for the analysis of 2,263 clinically significant species of Gram-negative bacteria. According to studies, The accuracy of MALDI-TOF MS in identifying isolates is remarkable, achieving 99.8% at the genus level and approximately 98.2% at the species level (Gato, E., et al., 2022). On the other hand, for Gram-positive bacteria evaluations, 92.8% correct identification to the species level and 95.5% to the genus level (Teke, L., Barış, A., and Bayraktar, B., 2021). Consequently, this facilitates the efficient and precise identification of a diverse array of microbial isolates under various culture conditions using MALDI-TOF MS technology.
Studies indicate that microbial load in clean rooms can vary with seasons where higher humidity and temperature, can contribute to increased microbial growth and dispersion. Seasonal variations necessitate adjustments in cleaning and disinfection protocols to maintain the required sterility levels in clean rooms (De Vecchi, F., and DeSantis, P. 2021). The results demonstrate a clear pattern: the monsoon season exhibited the highest pre-fogging microbial loads, likely due to elevated humidity and increased microbial dispersal from the surrounding environment. Fogging with QUAT-based disinfectants during this season resulted in the highest efficacy, with a 90% reduction in microbial load on settle plates. This enhanced effectiveness is possibly attributed to the stability and prolonged suspension of disinfectant droplets in humid air, leading to better surface coverage and contact with microbes. Moreover, the presence of diverse microbial populations during monsoon can be attributed to higher humidity levels, which are known to support microbial growth and dispersion (Egberongbe,et al.,2021).
In contrast, the reduction in species diversity post-fogging in winter, where species like Staphylococcus cohnii were not detected after fogging, could be due to lower ambient temperatures and humidity levels that are less conducive to microbial proliferation (Siebielec, S.,et al.,2020). The appearance of fungi in air samples post-fumigation during the winter season is particularly noteworthy. The detected fungi, can pose significant challenges in clean room environments due to their spores being highly resistant to standard disinfection methods (Andersenet al.,2019). The analysis reveals that the fogging process is most effective during the monsoon season, achieving a 50% reduction in microbial load. This increased effectiveness may be due to the higher humidity levels prevalent during the monsoon, which could enhance the activity of the QUAT-based disinfectant. Conversely, the summer season exhibited the least effectiveness, with only 6% reduction in microbial load. This suggests that higher temperatures and potentially lower humidity may reduce the efficacy of the disinfectant.
During winter season there is moderate reduction of 17%, indicating some effectiveness of the disinfectant in cooler conditions. In contrast, the fogging process was less effective during the summer season, achieving only a 40% reduction in microbial load. The high ambient temperature and lower humidity may contribute to the rapid evaporation of disinfectant droplets, thereby reducing contact time with microbial cells and diminishing biocidal activity (Oliveiraet al., 2020). Furthermore, microbial cells exposed to heat stress can enter a physiological state where they form biofilms or upregulate stress-related genes, increasing resistance to chemical disinfectants (Bridieret al., 2015). The winter season showed moderate fogging efficacy (57%), which may be attributed to more stable ambient conditions, though the reduced humidity likely limits droplet persistence and surface adherence, thus impacting the uniformity of disinfection (Masottiet al., 2019).
The use of MALDI-TOF MS enabled precise identification of microbial species, including both recurring and seasonal isolates. Notably, Pseudomonas stutzeri was found across all seasons, while species such as Moraxella osloensis and Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum appeared post-fogging, suggesting that disinfection may suppress dominant flora and create ecological niches for less common microbes. These observations highlight the need to evaluate not just microbial count reduction, but also species-level shifts post-disinfection. The seasonal variability in microbial trends emphasizes the necessity for dynamic and data-driven contamination control strategies. Disinfection protocols may need seasonal adjustment, such as increasing fogging frequency or alternating biocides during summer months. Moreover, the emergence of new species post-fogging supports the need for regular microbial profiling to monitor potential resistance or recolonization patterns.
While the study offers valuable insights, it is limited by the exclusion of fungal profiling through MALDI-TOF MS and a focus on a single disinfection method. Future studies should include comparative efficacy of multiple disinfectants and consider real-time environmental condition logging to correlate with microbial trends.
CONCLUSION
The study aimed at rapid identification of microbial strains by MALDI-TOF-MS which is effective and well suited for routine microbial identification in any laboratory. It is one of the fastest techniques to accurately identify microorganisms grown in cleanroom. The study reveals significant seasonal variability in microbial contamination and disinfection outcomes, with monsoon showing the highest microbial load and best disinfection response, while summer posed challenges to QUAT-based fogging efficacy. The study advocates for seasonally adaptive disinfection protocols, continuous monitoring, and broader microbial spectrum coverage to ensure consistent cleanroom hygiene. These findings are crucial for optimizing clean room maintenance and ensuring microbial control in pharmaceutical testing labs. These strategies are essential to support robust contamination control in pharmaceutical testing environments and maintain compliance with regulatory standards.
Cite this article:
Kavale HP, Upadhye VJ. Seasonal Assessment of Microbial Contamination and Disinfectant Efficacy in Cleanroom using MALDI-TOF MS in a NABL-Accredited Pharmaceutical Testing Laboratory. J Young Pharm. 2025;17(4):855-63.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors acknowledge the contribution of Ms. Shilpa Nair of Biotech Laboratory for her help and support throughout the work.
ABBREVIATIONS
| HCCA | α-Cyano-4-Hydroxycinnamic Acid |
|---|---|
| QUAT | Quaternary Ammonium Compound |
| SCDA | Soybean-Casein Digest Agar |
| PDAc | Potato Dextrose Agar with Chloramphenicol |
| CFU | Colony Forming Units |
| USP | United States Pharmacopeia |
| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |
| EMA | European Medicines Agency |
| GMP | Good Manufacturing Practice |
| MALDI-TOF MS | Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry |
| NABL | National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories |
| m/z ratio | Mass-to-Charge Ratio |
References
- Andersen B. M., Andersen B. M.. (2019) Disinfection of rooms and surfaces. Prevention and control of infections in hospitals.. Practice and Theory : 897-905 Google Scholar
- Berthod F., Bouchoud L., Grossrieder F., Falaschi L., Senhaji S., Bonnabry P., et al. (2020) Learning good manufacturing practices in an escape room: Validation of a new pedagogical tool.. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 26: 853-860 https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155219875504 | Google Scholar
- Bourdichon F., Betts R., Dufour C., Fanning S., Farber J., McClure P., Stavropoulou D. A., Wemmenhove E., Zwietering M. H., Winkler A., et al. (2021) Processing environment monitoring in low moisture food production facilities: Are we looking for the right microorganisms?. International Journal of Food Microbiology 356: Article 109351 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109351 | Google Scholar
- Bridier A., Sanchez-Vizuete P., Guilbaud M., Piard J. C., Naïtali M., Briandet R., et al. (2015) Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens.. Food Microbiology 45(: 167-178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015 | Google Scholar
- Chai J., Donnelly T., Wong T., Bryce E.. (2018) Environmental sampling of hospital surfaces: Assessing methodological quality.. Canadian Journal of Infection Control 33: 138-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015 | Google Scholar
- Das A. K.. (2023) Microbial determination methods in pharmaceutical and food quality control. (Doctoral dissertation, Brac University) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015 | Google Scholar
- De Vecchi F., DeSantis P.. (2021) In Handbook of validation in pharmaceutical processes : 67-88 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003163138-5 | Google Scholar
- Dhingra S., Rahman N. A. A., Peile E., Rahman M., Sartelli M., Hassali M. A., Islam T., Islam S., Haque M., et al. (2020) Microbial resistance movements: An overview of global public health threats posed by antimicrobial resistance, and how best to counter.. Frontiers in Public Health 8: Article 535668 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.535668 | Google Scholar
- Egberongbe H. O., Bankole M. O., Popoola T. O. S., Olowofeso O.. (2021) Seasonal variation of enteric bacteria population in surface water sources among rural communities of Ijebu North, Ogun State, Nigeria.. Agro-Science 20: 81-85 https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v20i2.13 | Google Scholar
- Elbehiry A., Aldubaib M., Abalkhail A., Marzouk E.ALbeloushi A., Moussa., et al. (2022) How MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry technology contributes to microbial infection control in healthcare settings.. Vaccines, I., and Rawway, M. 10: 1881 https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111881 | Google Scholar
- Gato E., Anantharajah A., Arroyo M. J., Artacho M. J., Caballero J. D. D., Candela A., Chudějová K., Constanso I. P., Elías C., Fernández J., Jiménez J., Lumbreras P., Méndez G., Mulet X., Pérez-Palacios P., Rodríguez-Sánchez B., Cantón R., Hrabák J., Mancera L., Oviaño M., et al. (2021) Multicenter performance evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS for rapid detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacterales: The future of networking data analysis with online software.. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: Article 789731 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.789731 | Google Scholar
- Gerba C. P., Pepper I. L.. (2019) In Environmental and pollution science : 191-217 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00013-6 | Google Scholar
- Hall S. K.. (2018) In Applications and computational elements of industrial hygiene : 177-240 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315137551-4 | Google Scholar
- Junior W. J. F. L., Dos Santos Alves J., Martins A. M. D., Rezende C. S. M., Cappato L. P.. (2024) Fogging vs immersion techniques for sustainable pathogen inactivation on stainless steel surfaces using commercial sanitizers.. Journal of Food Engineering, Article 112249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112249 | Google Scholar
- Masotti F., Cattaneo S., Stuknytė M., De Noni I.. (2019) Airborne contamination in the food industry: An update on monitoring and disinfection techniques of air.. Trends in Food Science and Technology 90: 147-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.006 | Google Scholar
- Mohammed S. S. D., Balogu T. V.. (2023) In Aeromicrobiology : 89-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.006 | Google Scholar
- Oliveira M., Tiwari B. K., Duffy G.. (2020) Emerging technologies for aerial decontamination of food storage environments to eliminate microbial cross-contamination.. Foods 9: 1779 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121779 | Google Scholar
- Rizwan M., Ahmad S., Shah S. N., Ali M., Shah M. U. H., Zaman M., Suleman H., Habib M., Tariq R., Krzywanski J., et al. (2022) Optimizing the air conditioning layouts of an indoor built environment: Towards the energy and environmental benefits of a clean room.. Buildings 12: 2158 https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122158 | Google Scholar
- Siebielec S., Woźniak M., Gałązka A., Siebielec G.. (2020) Microorganisms as indoor and outdoor air biological pollution.. Postępy Mikrobiologii-Advancements of Microbiology 59: 115-127 https://doi.org/10.21307/PM-2020.59.2.009 | Google Scholar
- Teke L., Barış A., Bayraktar B.. (2021) Comparative evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for non-albicans Candida and uncommon yeast isolates.. Journal of Microbiological Methods 185: Article 106232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106232 | Google Scholar
- Torres-Sangiao E., Leal Rodriguez C., García-Riestra C.. (2021) Application and perspectives of MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry in clinical microbiology laboratories.. Microorganisms 9: 1539 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071539 | Google Scholar
- Verbeek J. H., Rajamaki B., Ijaz S., Sauni R., Toomey E., Blackwood B., Tikka C., Ruotsalainen J. H., Kilinc Balci F. S., et al. (2020) Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4: Article CD011621 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4 | Google Scholar